Conflict Resolution Automation and Pilot Situation Awareness

扫码查看

原文链接

NETL

外文摘要：This study compared pilot situation awareness across three traffic management concepts that varied traffic separation responsibility between the pilots, air-traffic controllers, and an automation system. In Concept 1, the flight deck was equipped with conflict resolution tools that enable them to perform the tasks of weather avoidance and self-separation from surrounding traffic. In Concept 2, air-traffic controllers were responsible for traffic separation, but pilots were provided tools for weather and traffic avoidance. In Concept 3, a ground based automation was used for conflict detection and resolution, and the flight deck tools allowed pilots to deviate for weather, but not detect conflicts. Results showed that pilot situation awareness was highest in Concept 1, where the pilots were most engaged, and lowest in Concept 3, where automation was heavily used. These findings suggest that pilot situation awareness on conflict resolution tasks can be improved by keeping them in the decision-making loop.

外文关键词：

situation awarenessflight deckautomationNextGenSAGATSPAM

作者：

Arik-Quang V. Dao、Summer L. Brandt、L. Paige Bacon、Joshua M. Kraut、Jimmy Nguyen、Katsumi Minakata、Hamzah Raza、Walter W. Johnson

展开 >

作者单位：

San Jose State University, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA

California State University Long Beach, Dept of Psychology,Long Beach, CA 90840, USA

NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA

会议名称：

International conference on human-computer interaction;Symposium on human interface;HCI international 2011

会议地点：

Orlando, FL(US);Orlando, FL(US);Orlando, FL(US)

会议母体文献：

Human interface and the management of information : Interacting with information

页码：

p.473-482

出版时间：

2011