Anchored Decisions in Multi-Factor Decision-Making: A Comparison of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Choosing by Advantages

扫码查看

原文链接

NETL

外文摘要：The author presents a comparison between Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Choosing by Advantages (CBA)。 The author highlights differences between the two decision making systems pertaining to vocabulary， computing criteria priorities and capturing user judgments。 AHP uses pairwise comparisons to compute criteria priorities at multiple levels。 CBA asserts that sound decision making methods anchor decisions to the relevant facts and base decisions on the importance of the advantages of the alternatives， as elicited from the decision maker。

外文关键词：

Decision MakingMulti-criteria decision makingAnalytical Hierarchy ProcessChoosing by advantages

作者：

Richard Jenson

展开 >

作者单位：

Utah State University

会议名称：

Decision Sciences Institute annual meeting

会议地点：

Seattle, WA(US)

会议母体文献：

46th Decision Sciences Institute annual meeting 2015: Decision sciences in the 21st century: theoretical impact and practical relevance

页码：

870-886

出版时间：

2015