查看更多>>摘要：? 2022 Elsevier Inc.Introduction: Emerging research demonstrates lower rates of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR), public AED (PAD), worse outcomes, and higher incidence of OHCA during the COVID-19 pandemic. We aim to characterize the incidence of OHCA during the early pandemic period and the subsequent long-term period while describing changes in OHCA outcomes and survival. Methods: We analyzed adult OHCAs in Texas from the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES) during March 11–December 31 of 2019 and 2020. We stratified cases into pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 periods. Our prehospital outcomes were bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR), public AED use (PAD), sustained ROSC, and prehospital termination of resuscitation (TOR). Our hospital survival outcomes were survival to hospital admission, survival to hospital discharge, good neurological outcomes (CPC Score of 1 or 2) and Utstein bystander survival. We created a mixed effects logistic regression model analyzing the association between the pandemic on outcomes, using EMS agency as the random intercept. Results: There were 3619 OHCAs (45.0% of overall study population) in 2019 compared to 4418 (55.0% of overall study population) in 2020. Rates of BCPR (46.2% in 2019 to 42.2% in 2020, P < 0.01) and PAD (13.0% to 7.3%, p < 0.01) decreased. Patient survival to hospital admission decreased from 27.2% in 2019 to 21.0% in 2020 (p < 0.01) and survival to hospital discharge decreased from 10.0% in 2019 to 7.4% in 2020 (p < 0.01). OHCA patients were less likely to receive PAD (aOR = 0.5, 95% CI [0.4, 0.8]) and the odds of field termination increased (aOR = 1.5, 95% CI [1.4, 1.7]). Conclusions: Our study adds state-wide evidence to the national phenomenon of long-term increased OHCA incidence during COVID-19, worsening rates of BCPR, PAD use and survival outcomes.
查看更多>>摘要：? 2022 Elsevier Inc.Background: Faculty who identify as women or racial/ethnic groups underrepresented in medicine (URiM) are less likely to occupy senior leadership positions or be promoted. Recent attention has focused on interventions to decrease this gap; thus, we aim to evaluate changes in leadership and academic promotion for these populations over time. Methods: Successive cross-sectional observational study of six years (2015 to 2020) of data from the Academy of Administrators/Association of Academic Chairs of Emergency Medicine- Benchmark Survey. Primary analyses focused on gender/URiM differences in leadership roles and academic rank. Secondary analysis focused on disparities during the first 10 years of practice. Statistical modeling was conducted to address the primary aim of assessing differences in gender/URiM representation in EM leadership roles/rank over time. Results: 12,967 responses were included (4589 women, 8378 men). Women had less median years as faculty (7 vs 11). Women and URiM were less likely to hold a leadership role and had lower academic rank with no change over the study period. More women were consistently in the early career cohort (within 10 years or less as faculty) : 2015 =–75.0% [95% CI:± 3.8%] v 61.4% [95% CI:± 3.0%]; 2020 =–75.1% [95% CI: ± 2.9%] v 63.3%, [95% CI:: ± 2.5%]. Men were significantly more likely to have any leadership role compared to women in 2015 and 2020 (2015 = 54.3% [95% CI: ± 3.1%] v 44.8%, [95% CI: ± 4.3%]; 2020 = 43.1% [95% CI:± 2.5%] v 34.8 [95% CI:± 3.1%]). Higher academic rank (associate/professor) was significantly more frequent among early career men than women in 2015 (21.1% [95% CI:± 2.58%] v 12.9%; [95% CI:± 3.0%]) and 2020 (23.1% [95% CI:± 2.2%] v 17.4%; [95% CI:± 2.5%]). Conclusions: Disparities in women and URiM faculty leadership and academic rank persist, with no change over a six-year time span. Men early career faculty are more likely to hold leadership positions and be promoted to higher academic rank, suggesting early career inequities must be a target for future interventions.
查看更多>>摘要：? 2022Introduction: Adult epiglottitis is a serious condition that carries with it a high rate of morbidity and even mortality due to airway occlusion. Objective: This review highlights the pearls and pitfalls of epiglottitis in adult patients, including diagnosis, initial resuscitation, and management in the emergency department (ED) based on current evidence. Discussion: Epiglottitis is a life-threatening emergency that occurs more commonly in adults in the current medical era with vaccinations. Children present more commonly with acute respiratory distress and fever, while adults present most commonly with severe dysphagia in a subacute manner. Other symptoms may include drooling, muffled voice, and dyspnea. Streptococcus and Staphylococcus bacteria are the most common etiologies, but others include viral, fungal, caustic, thermal injuries, and autoimmune. Lateral neck radiographs assist in diagnosis, but they may be falsely negative. Visualization of the epiglottis is the key to diagnosis. Airway assessment and management are paramount, which has transitioned from direct laryngoscopy to flexible intubating endoscopy and video laryngoscopy with assistance from anesthesia and/or otolaryngology if available. Along with airway assessment, antibiotics should be administered. Corticosteroids and nebulized epinephrine are controversial but should be considered. Patients should be admitted to the intensive care setting for close airway observation or ventilatory management if intubated. Conclusions: An understanding of epiglottitis can assist emergency clinicians in diagnosing and managing this potentially deadly disease.
查看更多>>摘要：? 2022 Elsevier Inc.Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly affected the habits of patients, as well as its negative effects on human health. The aim of this study is to investigate the factors associated with discharge against medical advice (DAMA) from the emergency department (ED) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of the charts of DAMA cases (pandemic group) between May 1 and October 30, 2021 in a tertiary hospital in Istanbul, Turkey. Our data were compared with DAMA cases between May 1 and October 30, 2019 (pre-pandemic group-control group). Results: During the pandemic period, DAMA cases increased by 24.5% in the ED compared to the previous period. Compared to the pre-COVID-19 period, among DAMA cases during the COVID-19 period, the rate of those arriving by ambulance (10.9 vs. 18.8%), those with one or more comorbid diseases (8.9 vs. 18.4%), those with a high triage level (4.0 vs. 7.4%), those with health tourism or refugee/asylum insurance (2.9 vs. 6.1%), those with trauma (11.5 vs. 19.9%) or alcohol/drug abuse (2.7 vs. 4.0%) increased significantly (p < 0.001). It was observed that DAMA cases' waiting times for total ED and from the door to doctor decreased during the pandemic period compared to the pre-pandemic period. Conclusion: During the COVID-19 pandemic period, it was observed that the rate of those with severe disease increased among DAMA cases. Necessary precautions should be taken for all patients, especially seriously ill patients, to feel safe in the hospital and to be treated, and the negative consequences that may develop should be prevented by addressing the concerns of the patients and their relatives.
查看更多>>摘要：? 2022Objective: Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are a diagnostic challenge for Emergency Medicine (EM) clinicians. To help clinicians assess patients with non-ST-elevation ACS (NSTEACS), clinical decision aids have been developed, combining clinical history, cardiac troponin and the electrocardiograph (ECG). These models ask the clinician to subjectively assess the ECG variable, introducing reliability issues. We set out to derive an ECG model that would provide an objective measure for ischaemia using non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) as the primary outcome. Methods: We derived an ECG model in a retrospective Emergency Department cohort using logistic regression with a primary outcome of NSTEMI. All patients presented with signs or symptoms suggestive of an ACS. The model was validated in a multi-centre prospective Emergency Department cohort. Results: Derivation included 1246 patients, 156 (12.5%) had the primary outcome; validation included 1139 patients, 170 (14.9%) had the primary outcome. Derivation demonstrated Sn 25.6% (95% CI 19.0–33.2), Sp 96.3% (95% CI 95.0–97.4), PPV 50.0% (95% CI 40.0–60.0) and NPV 90.1% (95% CI 89.2–90.9). Validation demonstrated Sn 23.5% (95% CI 17.4% to 30.6%), Sp 95.2% (95% CI 93.6% to 96.4%), PPV 46.0% (95% CI 36.6% to 55.7%) and NPV 87.6% (95% CI 86.7% to 88.5%). Conclusion: We have derived and validated an ECG model that is highly specific for NSTEMI and may be suitable for integration into existing clinical decision aids.
查看更多>>摘要：? 2022 Elsevier Inc.Purpose: Optimal sepsis outcomes are achieved when sepsis is recognized early. Recognizing sepsis in the prehospital, EMS setting can be challenging and unreliable. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether implementation of an EMS sepsis screening and prehospital alert protocol called PRESS (PREhospital SepsiS) is associated with improved sepsis recognition by EMS providers. Design: We conducted a 12-month, before-after implementation study of the PRESS protocol in a large, public EMS system. The study intervention was a PRESS training program delivered to EMS providers. EMS patient inclusion criteria included: age ≥ 18 years, EMS systolic blood pressure < 110 mmHg, EMS heart rate > 90 bpm, and EMS respiratory rate > 20 bpm. Study exclusion criteria included the presence of any of following EMS conditions: trauma, cardiac arrest, pregnancy, toxic ingestion, or psychiatric emergency. Retrospective chart review was performed on all eligible EMS encounters during the study period. The primary outcome variable was the proportion of patients with sepsis who were identified by EMS providers. Results: Approximately 300 EMS providers were trained to use PRESS. A total of 498 patient encounters met criteria for study inclusion; 222 were excluded, primarily due to trauma. A total of 276 patient encounters were analyzed. Sepsis recognition by EMS providers increased from 12% pre-PRESS protocol to 59% post-PRESS protocol (p < 0.001). In a post-hoc analysis of the post-PRESS cohort, septic patients who were identified by EMS received antibiotics 24 min faster than septic patients who were not identified by EMS [28 min (IQR 18–48) vs 52 (IQR 27–98), respectively, p = 0.021]. Conclusion: Implementation of an EMS sepsis screening and prehospital alert protocol was associated with an increase in sepsis recognition rates by EMS providers and a decrease in time to first antibiotic administration in the emergency department. Further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of this protocol in other populations.
查看更多>>摘要：? 2022 Elsevier Inc.Introduction: The S100? protein (PS100?) is a biomarker, which has demonstrated its importance in diagnoses ruling out intracranial hemorrhages in people with light head traumas This study aims to evaluate if the PS100? presents an interest in the diagnostic strategy for subarachnoid hemorrhages (SAH). Methods: Prospective non-randomized multicentric study in three hospitals from October 2018 to January 2020. Every patient who came into the emergency department for an intense non-traumatic headache lasting less than 3 h received an PS100? assay and a non-injected head computed tomography (CT) scan. The primary endpoint was the number of patients with a diagnosis of SAH on the head CT scan with a PS100? level of under 0.10 μg/L. Results: 60 patients were included and five patients had a SAH. Four patients had an SAH with a PS100? level lower than 0.10 μg/L and one patient had an SAH with a PS100? level higher than 0.10 μg/L. The negative predictive value for the PS100? with a discriminating threshold less than or equal to 0,10 μg/L in the diagnosis ruling out SAH was 93% [IC 95%: 0,86–1]. Conclusion: S100? protein assay with a discriminating threshold of 0,10 μg/L does not demonstrate any interest in the diagnostic strategy for non-traumatic SAH.
查看更多>>摘要：? 2022Purpose: Facial trauma and orbital fractures are common reasons for ophthalmology consultation in the emergency department (ED). The purpose of this study is to assess intervention rates and evaluate the acuity of ophthalmology consultation for orbital fractures in the ED. Basic procedures: A retrospective chart review of orbital fractures was conducted over a 23-month period. 379 cases of orbital fractures were identified in a single-center study. All patients that received an ophthalmology consultation in the ED were included. Demographics, mechanism and location of orbital fracture, ophthalmic complications, and surgical and non-surgical ophthalmic interventions were recorded. The primary study outcome was the rate of ophthalmic consultation and intervention with and without retrospective application of our proposed South Texas Orbital Fracture Protocol (STOP). Results: Immediate ophthalmic intervention was performed in 18.7% of patients. Statistically significant subjective, radiographic, and physical exam features correlating with ophthalmic intervention were identified and included globe rupture, concern for entrapment, orbital roof fractures, and retrobulbar hematoma. Retrospective application of our proposed South Texas Orbital Fracture Protocol (STOP) would have resulted in 186 of 379 patients requiring ophthalmology consultation, thus reducing consultation rate by 51% with an improved rate of intervention from 18.7% to 37.6%. Conclusions: Orbital fractures can be associated with severe ocular complications. Most cases, however, do not require emergent evaluation by an ophthalmologist. We propose the South Texas Orbital Fracture Protocol (STOP) for proper assessment and triaging of orbital fractures in the ED. While this clinical decision-making tool requires validation, it may offer improved healthcare efficiency, reduced costs, fewer unnecessary inter-facility transfers, and less burnout for ophthalmology residents.
Nikolla D.A.Carlson J.N.Jimenez Stuart P.M.Asar I....
7页
查看更多>>摘要：? 2022 Elsevier Inc.Introduction: Laryngoscope blade shape may differentially facilitate first-attempt success in patients intubated in non-supine positions in the emergency department (ED). Therefore, we analyzed first-attempt success in ramped and upright positions stratified by hyperangulated or standard geometry video laryngoscopes (VL). Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of the National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR) on ED intubations from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018. Our primary outcome was first-attempt success, and secondary outcomes included first-attempt success without adverse events and glottic view. We included all VL intubation attempts in the ramped and upright positions on medical patients >17-years-old. We calculated adjusted odds ratios (aOR) using a multivariable logistic regression mixed-effects model with site as a random effect and blade type, obesity / morbid obesity, training level (i.e., post-graduate year), operator-perceived difficult airway, and presence of an objective difficult airway finding as fixed effects. Results: Our analysis included 266 attempts with hyperangulated blades and 370 attempts with standard geometry blades in the ramped cohort, and 116 attempts with hyperangulated attempts and 55 attempts with standard geometry blades in the upright cohort. In the ramped cohort, 244 (91.7%) of hyperangulated first attempts were successful, and 341 (92.2%) of standard geometry first attempts were successful (aOR 1.02 [95% confidence interval 0.56, 1.84]). In the upright cohort, 107 (92.2%) of hyperangulated first attempts were successful, and 50 (90.9%) of standard geometry first attempts were successful (aOR 1.04 [0.28, 3.86]). There was no difference across the secondary outcomes, including first-attempt success without adverse events. Conclusion: Hyperangulated and standard geometry VL had similar first-attempt success in ramped and upright position intubations in the ED.
查看更多>>摘要：? 2022 Elsevier Inc.Introduction: Noninvasive risk assessment is crucial in patients with COVID-19 in emergency department. Since limited data is known about the role of noninvasive parameters, we aimed to evaluate the role of a noninvasive parameter ‘SpO2/FiO2’ in independently predicting 30-day mortality in patients with COVID-19 and its prognostic utility in combination with a noninvasive score ‘CRB-65’. Methods: A retrospective study was performed in a tertiary training and research hospital, which included 272 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia diagnosed with polymerase chain reaction in emergency department. Data on characteristics, vital signs, and laboratory parameters were recorded from electronic medical records. The primary outcome of the study was 30-day mortality, and we assessed the discriminative ability of SpO2/FiO2 in predicting mortality in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and its prognostic utility in combination with conventional pneumonia risk assessment scores. Results: Multivariate analysis revealed that only SpO2/FiO2 level was found to be an independent parameter associated with 30-day mortality (OR:0.98, 95% CI: 0.98–0.99, p = 0.003). PSI and CURB-65 were found to be better scores than CRB-65 in predicting 30-day mortality (AUC: 0.79 vs 0.72, p = 0.04; AUC: 0.76 vs 0.72, p = 0.01 respectively). Both SpO2/FiO2 combined with CRB-65 and SpO2/FiO2 combined with CURB-65 have good discriminative ability and seemed to be more favorable than PSI in predicting 30-days mortality (AUC: 0.83 vs 0.75; AUC: 0.84 vs 0.75), however no significant difference was found (p = 0.21 and p = 0.06, respectively). Conclusion: SpO2/FiO2 is a promising index in predicting mortality. Addition of SpO2/FiO2 to CRB-65 improved the role of CRB-65 alone, however it performed similar to PSI. The combined noninvasive model of SpO2/FiO2 and CRB-65 may help physicians quickly stratify COVID-19 patients on admission, which is expected to be particularly important in hospitals still stressed by pandemic volumes.
NSTL
Elsevier