查看更多>>摘要：When presented with locally paired dots moving in opposite directions, motion selective neurons in the middle temporal cortex (MT) reduce firing while neurons in V1 are unaffected. This physiological effect is known as motion opponency. The current study used psychophysics to investigate the neural circuit underlying motion opponency. We asked whether opposing motion signals could arrive from different eyes into the receptive field of a binocular neuron while still maintaining motion opponency. We took advantage of prior findings that orientation discrimination of the motion axis (along which paired dots oscillate) is harder when dots move counterphase than in-phase, an effect associated with motion opponency. We found that such an effect disappeared when paired dots originated from different eyes. This suggests that motion opponency, at some point, involves strictly monocular processing. This does not mean that motion opponency is entirely monocular. Further, we found that the effect of a Glass pattern disappeared under similar viewing conditions, suggesting that Glass pattern perception also involves some strictly monocular processing.
查看更多>>摘要：When presented with locally paired dots moving in opposite directions, motion selective neurons in the middle temporal cortex (MT) reduce firing while neurons in V1 are unaffected. This physiological effect is known as motion opponency. The current study used psychophysics to investigate the neural circuit underlying motion opponency. We asked whether opposing motion signals could arrive from different eyes into the receptive field of a binocular neuron while still maintaining motion opponency. We took advantage of prior findings that orientation discrimination of the motion axis (along which paired dots oscillate) is harder when dots move counterphase than in-phase, an effect associated with motion opponency. We found that such an effect disappeared when paired dots originated from different eyes. This suggests that motion opponency, at some point, involves strictly monocular processing. This does not mean that motion opponency is entirely monocular. Further, we found that the effect of a Glass pattern disappeared under similar viewing conditions, suggesting that Glass pattern perception also involves some strictly monocular processing.
查看更多>>摘要：Processing of visual information in the central (foveal) and peripheral visual field is vastly different. To achieve a homogeneous representation of the visual world across eye movements, the visual system needs to compensate for these differences. By introducing subtle changes between peripheral and foveal inputs across saccades, one can test this compensation. We morphed shapes between a triangle and a circle and presented two different change directions (circularity decrease or increase) at varying magnitudes across a saccade. In a changediscrimination task, observers disproportionally often reported percepts of circularity increase. To test the relationship with visual-field differences, we measured perception when shapes were exclusively presented either in the periphery (before a saccade), or in the fovea (after a saccade). We found that overall shapes were perceived as more circular before than after a saccade and the more pronounced this difference was for a participant, the smaller was their circularity-increase bias in the change-discrimination task. We propose that visual-field differences have a direct and an indirect influence on transsaccadic perception of shape change. The direct influence is based on the distinct appearance of shape in the central and peripheral visual field in a trial, causing an increase of the perceptual magnitude of circularity-decrease changes. The indirect influence is based on long-term build-up of transsaccadic expectations; if a change is opposite (circularity increase) to the expectation (circularity decrease), it should elicit a strong error signal facilitating change detection. We discuss the concept of transsaccadic expectations and theoretical implications for transsaccadic perception of other feature changes.
查看更多>>摘要：Processing of visual information in the central (foveal) and peripheral visual field is vastly different. To achieve a homogeneous representation of the visual world across eye movements, the visual system needs to compensate for these differences. By introducing subtle changes between peripheral and foveal inputs across saccades, one can test this compensation. We morphed shapes between a triangle and a circle and presented two different change directions (circularity decrease or increase) at varying magnitudes across a saccade. In a changediscrimination task, observers disproportionally often reported percepts of circularity increase. To test the relationship with visual-field differences, we measured perception when shapes were exclusively presented either in the periphery (before a saccade), or in the fovea (after a saccade). We found that overall shapes were perceived as more circular before than after a saccade and the more pronounced this difference was for a participant, the smaller was their circularity-increase bias in the change-discrimination task. We propose that visual-field differences have a direct and an indirect influence on transsaccadic perception of shape change. The direct influence is based on the distinct appearance of shape in the central and peripheral visual field in a trial, causing an increase of the perceptual magnitude of circularity-decrease changes. The indirect influence is based on long-term build-up of transsaccadic expectations; if a change is opposite (circularity increase) to the expectation (circularity decrease), it should elicit a strong error signal facilitating change detection. We discuss the concept of transsaccadic expectations and theoretical implications for transsaccadic perception of other feature changes.
查看更多>>摘要：In a random-dot stereogram (RDS), the spatial disparities between the interocularly corresponding black and white random dots determine the depths of object surfaces. If a black dot in one monocular image corresponds to a white dot in the other, disparity-tuned neurons in primary visual cortex (V1) respond as if their preferred disparities become non-preferred and vice versa, reversing the disparity sign reported to higher visual areas. Reversed depth is perceptible in the peripheral but not the central visual field. This study demonstrates that, in central vision, adding contrast-reversed dots to a noisy RDS (containing the normal contrast-matched dots) can augment or degrade depth perception. Augmentation occurs when the reversed depth signals are congruent with the normal depth signals to report the same disparity sign, and occurs regardless of the viewing duration. Degradation occurs when the reversed and normal depth signals are incongruent with each other and when the RDS is viewed briefly. These phenomena reflect the Feedforward-Feedback-Verify-and-reWeight (FFVW) process for visual inference in central vision, and are consistent with the central-peripheral dichotomy that central vision has a stronger top-down feedback from higher to lower brain areas to disambiguate noisy and ambiguous inputs from V1. When a RDS is viewed too briefly for feedback, augmentation and degradation work by adding the reversed depth signals from contrast-reversed dots to the feedforward, normal, depth signals. With a sufficiently long viewing duration, the feedback vetoes incongruent reversed depth signals and amends or completes the imperfect, but congruent, reversed depth signals by analysis-by-synthesis computation.
查看更多>>摘要：In a random-dot stereogram (RDS), the spatial disparities between the interocularly corresponding black and white random dots determine the depths of object surfaces. If a black dot in one monocular image corresponds to a white dot in the other, disparity-tuned neurons in primary visual cortex (V1) respond as if their preferred disparities become non-preferred and vice versa, reversing the disparity sign reported to higher visual areas. Reversed depth is perceptible in the peripheral but not the central visual field. This study demonstrates that, in central vision, adding contrast-reversed dots to a noisy RDS (containing the normal contrast-matched dots) can augment or degrade depth perception. Augmentation occurs when the reversed depth signals are congruent with the normal depth signals to report the same disparity sign, and occurs regardless of the viewing duration. Degradation occurs when the reversed and normal depth signals are incongruent with each other and when the RDS is viewed briefly. These phenomena reflect the Feedforward-Feedback-Verify-and-reWeight (FFVW) process for visual inference in central vision, and are consistent with the central-peripheral dichotomy that central vision has a stronger top-down feedback from higher to lower brain areas to disambiguate noisy and ambiguous inputs from V1. When a RDS is viewed too briefly for feedback, augmentation and degradation work by adding the reversed depth signals from contrast-reversed dots to the feedforward, normal, depth signals. With a sufficiently long viewing duration, the feedback vetoes incongruent reversed depth signals and amends or completes the imperfect, but congruent, reversed depth signals by analysis-by-synthesis computation.
Blake, Adam J.Couture, SamuelGo, Matthew C.Gries, Gerhard...
10页
查看更多>>摘要：While it is well documented that insects exploit polarized sky light for navigation, their use of reflected polarized light for object detection has been less well studied. Recently, we have shown that the small white butterfly, Pieris rapae, distinguishes between host and non-host plants based on the degree of linear polarization (DoLP) of light reflected from their leaves. To determine how polarized light cues affect host plant foraging by female P. rapae across their entire visual range including the ultraviolet (300-650 nm), we applied photo polarimetry demonstrating large differences in the DoLP of leaf-reflected light among plant species generally and between host and non-host plants specifically. As polarized light cues are directionally dependent, we also tested, and modelled, the effect of approach trajectory on the polarization of plant-reflected light and the resulting attractiveness to P. rapae. Using photo polarimetry measurements of plants under a range of light source and observer positions, we reveal several distinct effects when polarized reflections are examined on a whole-plant basis rather than at the scale of pixels or plant canopies. Most notably from our modeling, certain approach trajectories are optimal for foraging butterflies, or insects generally, to discriminate between plant species on the basis of the DoLP of leaf-reflected light.
Blake, Adam J.Couture, SamuelGo, Matthew C.Gries, Gerhard...
10页
查看更多>>摘要：While it is well documented that insects exploit polarized sky light for navigation, their use of reflected polarized light for object detection has been less well studied. Recently, we have shown that the small white butterfly, Pieris rapae, distinguishes between host and non-host plants based on the degree of linear polarization (DoLP) of light reflected from their leaves. To determine how polarized light cues affect host plant foraging by female P. rapae across their entire visual range including the ultraviolet (300-650 nm), we applied photo polarimetry demonstrating large differences in the DoLP of leaf-reflected light among plant species generally and between host and non-host plants specifically. As polarized light cues are directionally dependent, we also tested, and modelled, the effect of approach trajectory on the polarization of plant-reflected light and the resulting attractiveness to P. rapae. Using photo polarimetry measurements of plants under a range of light source and observer positions, we reveal several distinct effects when polarized reflections are examined on a whole-plant basis rather than at the scale of pixels or plant canopies. Most notably from our modeling, certain approach trajectories are optimal for foraging butterflies, or insects generally, to discriminate between plant species on the basis of the DoLP of leaf-reflected light.
NSTL
Elsevier