首页期刊导航|Addiction
期刊信息/Journal information
Addiction
Carfax Pub. Co.
Addiction

Carfax Pub. Co.

0965-2140

Addiction/Journal AddictionISSHPAHCISCI
正式出版
收录年代

    Issue Information

    2页
    查看更多>>摘要:No abstract is available for this article.

    Low‐ and very low‐dose buprenorphine induction: new(ish) uses for an old(ish) medication?

    Melissa B. WeimerDavid A. Fiellin
    3页

    The International Cannabis Toolkit (iCannToolkit): a multidisciplinary expert consensus on minimum standards for measuring cannabis use

    Adam WinstockWayne HallH. Valerie CurranTom P. Freeman...
    8页
    查看更多>>摘要:Abstract Background The lack of an agreed international minimum approach to measuring cannabis use hinders the integration of multidisciplinary evidence on the psychosocial, neurocognitive, clinical and public health consequences of cannabis use. Methods A group of 25 international expert cannabis researchers convened to discuss a multidisciplinary framework for minimum standards to measure cannabis use globally in diverse settings. Results The expert‐based consensus agreed upon a three‐layered hierarchical framework. Each layer—universal measures, detailed self‐report and biological measures—reflected different research priorities and minimum standards, costs and ease of implementation. Additional work is needed to develop valid and precise assessments. Conclusions Consistent use of the proposed framework across research, public health, clinical practice and medical settings would facilitate harmonisation of international evidence on cannabis consumption, related harms and approaches to their mitigation.

    The need to calibrate standardized cannabis measurements across cultures

    Lauren KuhnsEmese Kroon
    2页

    Coordinating cannabis data collection globally: Policy implications

    Susan R. B. WeissNora D. Volkow
    2页

    We need convincing data to support a public health approach to cannabis regulation

    Rebecca Jesseman
    3页

    The iCannToolkit: a tool to embrace measurement of medicinal and non‐medicinal cannabis use across licit, illicit and cross‐cultural settings

    Wayne HallH. Valerie CurranTom P. FreemanValentina Lorenzetti...
    3页

    A systematic review of behavioural smoking cessation interventions for people with severe mental ill health—what works?

    Panagiotis SpanakisEmily PeckhamBen YoungPaul Heron...
    17页
    查看更多>>摘要:Abstract Background and Aims People with severe mental ill health smoke more and suffer greater smoking‐related morbidity and mortality. Little is known about the effectiveness of behavioural interventions for smoking cessation in this group. This review evaluated randomized controlled trial evidence to measure the effectiveness of behavioural smoking cessation interventions (both digital and non‐digital) in people with severe mental ill health. Design Systematic review and random‐effects meta‐analysis. We searched between inception and January 2020 in Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Health Management Information Consortium and CENTRAL databases. Setting and participants Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effects of behavioural smoking cessation and reduction interventions in adults with severe mental ill health, conducted in any country, in either in‐patient or community settings and published in English. Measurements The primary outcome was biochemically verified smoking cessation. Smoking reduction and changes in mental health symptoms and body mass index (BMI) were included as secondary outcomes. Narrative data synthesis and meta‐analysis were conducted and the quality of included studies was appraised using the risk of bias 2 (RoB2) tool. Findings We included 12 individual studies (16 articles) involving 1861 participants. The first meta‐analysis (three studies, 921 participants) demonstrated effectiveness of bespoke face‐to‐face interventions compared with usual care across all time‐points [medium‐term: relative risk (RR)?=?2.29, 95% confidence interval (CI)?=?1.38–3.81; long‐term: RR?=?1.58, 95% CI?=?1.09–2.30]. The second (three studies, 275 participants) did not demonstrate any difference in effectiveness of bespoke digital on‐line interventions compared with standard digital on‐line interventions (medium‐term: RR?=?0.87, 95% CI?=?0.17–4.46). A narrative overview revealed mixed results when comparing bespoke face‐to‐face interventions with other active interventions. The methodological quality of studies was mixed, with the majority having some concerns mainly around risk of selective reporting. Conclusions Face‐to‐face bespoke smoking cessation interventions for adults with severe mental ill health appear to be effective when compared with treatment as usual, but evidence is equivocal when compared with other active interventions. There is limited evidence comparing bespoke digital interventions with generic interventions, and we found no studies comparing them with usual treatment.

    Associations of common mental disorder with alcohol use in the adult general population: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

    Jo‐Anne PuddephattPatricia IrizarAndrew JonesSuzanne H. Gage...
    30页
    查看更多>>摘要:Abstract Background and Aims Research has shown that alcohol use and common mental disorders (CMDs) co‐occur; however, little is known about how the global prevalence of alcohol use compares across different CMDs. We aimed to (i) report global associations of alcohol use (alcohol use disorder (AUD), binge drinking and consumption) comparing those with and without a CMD, (ii) examine how this differed among those with and without specific types of CMDs and (iii) examine how results may differ by study characteristics. Methods We used a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Cross‐sectional, cohort, prospective, longitudinal and case–control studies reporting the prevalence of alcohol use among those with and without a CMD in the general population were identified using PsycINFO, MEDLINE, PsyARTICLES, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science until March 2020. Depression, anxiety and phobia were included as a CMD. Studies were included if they used a standardized measure of alcohol use. A random‐effects meta‐analysis was conducted to generate pooled prevalence and associations of AUD with CMD with 95% confidence intervals (CI). A narrative review is provided for binge drinking and alcohol consumption Results A total of 512 full‐texts were reviewed, 51 included in our final review and 17 in our meta‐analyses (n?=?382?201). Individuals with a CMD had a twofold increase in the odds of reporting an AUD [odds ratio (OR)?=?2.02, 95% CI?=?1.72–2.36]. The odds of having an AUD were similar when stratified by the type of CMD (mood disorder: OR?=?2.00, 95% CI?=?1.62–2.47; anxiety/phobic disorder: OR?=?1.94, 95% CI?=?1.35–2.78). An analysis of study characteristics did not reveal any clear explanations for between‐study heterogeneity (I2?>?80%). There were no clear patterns for associations between having a CMD and binge drinking or alcohol consumption, respectively. Conclusions People with common mental disorders (depression, anxiety, phobia) are twice as likely to report an alcohol use disorder than people without common mental disorders.

    Effects of interventions to combat tobacco addiction: Cochrane update of 2019 and 2020 reviews

    Jonathan Livingstone‐BanksNicola LindsonJamie Hartmann‐BoycePaul Aveyard...
    16页
    查看更多>>摘要:Abstract Aims To summarize evidence on tobacco addiction interventions published by the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group (CTAG) from 2019 to 2020. Methods Narrative summary of all new and updated Cochrane Reviews published by CTAG in 2019 and 2020, outlining key results and promising avenues for future research. Results CTAG published six new reviews and updated 15 reviews. There is high‐certainty evidence that combining fast‐acting nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) with transdermal patches helped more people to quit than single‐form NRT [risk ratio (RR)?=?1.25, 95% confidence interval (CI)?=?1.15–1.36, 14 studies, n?=?11?356; I2?=?4%] and moderate‐certainty evidence that using NRT before quitting can increase quit rates more than using NRT from quit day onwards (RR?=?1.25, 95% CI?=?1.08–1.44, nine studies, n?=?4395; I2?=?0%). Reducing smoking in order to quit completely results in similar quit rates to abrupt quitting (RR?=?1.01, 95% CI=?0.87–1.17; I2?=?29%; 22 studies, n?=?9219; moderate‐certainty). Electronic cigarettes may help more people quit than NRT (RR?=?1.53, 95% CI?=?1.21–1.93; I2?=?0%; four studies, n?=?1924; moderate certainty), nicotine‐free electronic cigarettes (RR?=?1.94, 95% CI?=?1.21–3.13; I2?=?0%; five studies, n?=?1447; moderate‐certainty) and behavioural/no support (RR?=?2.61, 95% CI?=?1.44–4.74; I2?=?0%; six studies, n?=?2886; very low‐certainty). Varenicline may help prevent relapse in abstainers (RR?=?1.23, 95% CI?=?1.08–1.41; I2?=?82%; 11 studies, n?=?1297; moderate‐certainty), but behavioural support did not prevent relapse (RR?=?0.98, 95% CI?=?0.87–1.11; I2?=?52%; 11 studies, n?=?5523; moderate‐certainty). Financial incentives increased quit rates in the general population (RR?=?1.49, 95% CI?=?1.28–1.73; I2?=?33%; 30 studies, adjusted n?=?20?097; high‐certainty) and during pregnancy (RR?=?2.38, 95% CI?=?1.54–3.69; I2?=?41%; nine studies, n?=?2273; moderate‐certainty). This overview also provides detail on a wider range of interventions. Conclusions There is high certainty that using nicotine replacement therapy from quit day increases smoking abstinence and no further research is required. Evidence is less certain that nicotine replacement increases abstinence when used in higher doses tailored to particular groups of smokers or use prior to quit day, and further research would be helpful. There is moderate‐certainty evidence to support the use of e‐cigarettes as cessation aids, but research on their role in preventing relapse would be particularly helpful.