查看更多>>摘要：? 2022 Elsevier Inc.Purpose: Early in the pandemic, the American Society for Radiation Oncology surveyed physician leaders at radiation oncology practices in the United States to understand how the field was responding to the outbreak of COVID-19. Methods and Materials: Surveys were repeated at multiple points during the pandemic, with a response rate of 43% in April 2020 and 23% in January 2021. To our knowledge, this is the only longitudinal COVID-19 practice survey in oncology in the United States. Results: The surveys indicate that patient access to essential radiation oncology services in the United States has been preserved throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Safety protocols were universally adopted, telehealth was widely adopted and remains in use, and most clinics no longer deferred or postponed radiation treatments as of early 2021. Late-stage disease presentation, treatment interruptions, shortages of personal protective equipment, and vaccination barriers were reported significantly more at community-based practices than at academic practices, and rural practices appear to have faced increased obstacles. Conclusions: Our findings provide unique insights into the initial longitudinal effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the delivery of radiation therapy in the United States. Downstream lessons in service adaptation and improvement can potentially be guided by formal concepts of resilience, which have been broadly embraced across the US economy.
查看更多>>摘要：? 2021 Elsevier Inc.Purpose: Our purpose was to examine current practice patterns in non-English-speaking patients with breast cancer undergoing deep inspiratory breath hold (DIBH). Methods and Materials: An anonymous, voluntary REDCap survey was distributed to 60 residency program coordinators of US radiation oncology departments to survey their faculty and recent graduates. Eligibility was limited to board-certified radiation oncologists who had treated breast cancer within the prior 6 months. Results: There were 69 respondents, 53 of whom were eligible. Forty-two percent (n = 22) of eligible respondents were from the main site at an academic center, with 28% (n = 15) representing a satellite site and 30% (n = 16) from private practice. Fifty-three percent reported at least 10% of their patients were non-English speaking. Ninety percent offered DIBH at their institution; of those, 74% used DIBH for at least one-fourth of their patients with breast cancer. Ninety-eight percent of those who use DIBH performed coaching at simulation, with 32% answering they would be “less likely” to use DIBH for non-English speakers. When used, 94% take into consideration potential language barriers for proper execution of DIBH. However, 51% had an interpreter present 76% to 100% of the time at computed tomography simulation, which decreased to 31% at first fraction and 11% at subsequent treatments. For non-English-speaking patients undergoing DIBH coaching without a certified interpreter, 55% of respondents indicated that they provided verbal coaching in English, 32% indicated “not applicable” because they always use a certified interpreter, 11% used visual aids, and 32% indicated “other.” Of those who answered “other,” the most commonly cited response was using therapists or staff who spoke the patient's native language. Conclusions: Disparities in the application of DIBH exist despite its established utility in reducing cardiac dose. This study provides evidence that language barriers may affect physician treatment practices from initial consideration of DIBH to subsequent delivery. These data suggest that breast cancer treatment considerations and subsequent execution are negatively affected in non-English-speaking patients.
查看更多>>摘要：? 2021 Elsevier Inc.Purpose: Radiation oncologists need to have more than sound clinical and technical competencies. To optimize care for patients and advance all aspects of radiation oncology (RO), radiation oncologists must also be effective leaders. Embedding systematic leadership education into RO training programs is challenging. This study examined RO residents’ perspectives and preferences relating to leadership education. Such data inform the integration of universal leadership learning into RO training in Australia and New Zealand and identify priority areas to facilitate successful leadership development initiatives in RO training programs worldwide. Methods and Materials: Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with 13 RO residents across 8 Australian training departments and all stages of training. Data from transcriptions of taped interviews were coded by at least 2 researchers and collected to saturation. Qualitative thematic analysis was conducted using an iterative inductive process to develop codes into themes and subthemes. Representative quotes were collated to illustrate subthemes. Results: Four key themes related to leadership education were identified and labeled as follows: (1) recognition, credibility, and value of education; (2) logistics of formal learning; (3) real-world opportunities (“seeing and doing”); and (4) one size does not fit all. Residents unanimously reported that formal leadership education was important and that aspects of becoming a good leader could be learned. Organizational and cultural factors emerged as either barriers or facilitators to learning. There was strong support for interactive methods of learning, and role-modeling by senior colleagues was identified as having a major effect on junior learners. Conclusions: This study offers insight into RO residents’ perspectives of and preferences for their own leadership development. The findings have practical implications for the design of effective RO leadership programs and bring the RO field one step closer to the ultimate goal of enhancing leadership capability for all RO professionals.
NSTL
Elsevier