首页期刊导航|药物不良反应杂志
期刊信息/Journal information
药物不良反应杂志
药物不良反应杂志

程经华

双月刊

1008-5734

cadrj@sina.com

010-83198246

100053

北京长椿街45号

药物不良反应杂志/Journal Adverse Drug Reactions JournalCSCDCSTPCD北大核心
查看更多>>本刊专门报道药物不良反应及安全用药,其内容密切结合临床,学术性与实用性。
正式出版
收录年代

    砥砺奋进正当时 乘风破浪再扬帆

    夏培元孟艳
    1页
    查看更多>>摘要:律回春渐,新元肇启,春色满九州,中华医学会《药物不良反应杂志》又进入新的一年。杂志自1999年创刊,迄今已走过25年岁月。二十五年砥砺奋进,二十五载栉风沐雨,杂志在历任总编辑和编委的带领下,秉持"通过报道药物不良反应及其发生规律,促进药物安全信息的交流,提高临床安全用药水平,为保障公众用药安全、维护公众身体健康服务"的办刊宗旨,将用药安全的理念根植于神州大地。

    关注我国自主研发新药的安全性

    方振威仇琪林阳蔡晧东...
    2-5页
    查看更多>>摘要:随着我国药品审评审批制度的改革,自主研发新药和附条件批准药物逐年增多。因我国新药上市前临床试验、审评审批制度(尤其是附条件批准制度)和上市后监测管理等方面仍处于不断完善阶段,自主研发新药的安全性需要给予更多的关注,做好其上市后的安全性监测和研究。其中包括加强药物安全性监测工作,做好文献数据的系统性评价,通过高质量真实世界研究广泛收集药品安全性数据,对药物安全性报告数据进行深入挖掘等,为患者安全使用该类药物提供更多的数据支持。 Along with the reforms of the assessment and approval regime for new drugs in China in recent years, independently researched and developed innovative drugs and conditionally approved drugs in China have been more and more. The pre-market clinical trials, assessment and approval system (especially the conditional approval system), and post-market monitoring and management of new drugs in China are still in a continuous improvement stage. Thus we need to specially pay attention to the safety of innovative drugs that independently developed in China and do a good job in post-marketing safety supervision. More evidence-based information for safe use of this type of medication in patients can be provided through the following aspects: strengthening the drug safety monitoring, conducting systematic evaluation of literature data, widely collecting drug safety data through high-quality real-world research, and conducting in-depth mining of information from drug safety reports.

    药物警戒中国新药安全性药物监测

    我国与其他国家/地区药品附条件审批政策法规及其实施情况的比较与思考

    王心怡孙加琳全香花姜曼...
    6-11页
    查看更多>>摘要:药品附条件批准是指具有突出治疗价值的临床急需药品在未完成完整临床试验的情况下,通过"先批准后验证"的形式加快批准上市。从20世纪90年代起,美国、加拿大、欧盟、日本、澳大利亚和英国等先后实施药品附条件上市审批。2017年10月,我国开始批准药品附条件上市申请。本文对我国与其他国家/地区的药品附条件上市前条件和要求、上市后监测和监管的情况进行了比较,根据对比结果归纳并探讨了我国药品附条件审批制度可能的优化方向。 Drug conditional approval refers to the accelerated approval and marketing of clinically urgently needed drugs with outstanding therapeutic value through the form of "approval first, verification later" before completing complete clinical trials. Since the 1990s, the United States, Canada, the European Union, Japan, Australia, and the United Kingdom have successively implemented drug conditional approval for marketing. In 2017, the application for conditional approval of drugs was implemented in China. In this paper, the pre-market conditions and requirements, post-market monitoring and supervision of drugs in China are compared with other countries/regions. Based on the comparison results, the possible optimization directions of China′s drug conditional approval system are summarized and explored.

    药物警戒药物批准药物评价优先授权药品附条件批准

    卡瑞利珠单抗治疗非小细胞肺癌免疫相关不良事件发生情况及其与疗效关系的初步研究

    王少军李超刘彩霞苏乌云...
    12-17页
    查看更多>>摘要:目的 探讨卡瑞利珠单抗治疗非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)免疫相关不良事件(irAE)的发生情况及其与疗效的关系。 方法 收集2020年12月至2022年12月在内蒙古医科大学附属医院接受卡瑞利珠单抗治疗NSCLC患者的临床资料,对卡瑞利珠单抗的疗效及其irAE的发生情况进行回顾性分析。根据患者是否发生irAE,将患者分为irAE组和无irAE组,比较2组患者的客观反应率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)和无进展生存时间(PFS)。 结果 共48例患者纳入分析,男性41例(85.4%),女性7例(14.6%);年龄(65.9±7.4)岁,治疗中位周期数为9(6,14)个,总体ORR为52.1%(25/48),DCR为83.3%(40/48),中位PFS为11个月。48例患者中34例(70.8%)发生59例次irAE,其中8例(16.7%)发生至少1例次≥3级的irAE。irAE发生的中位周期数为5(3,7)个。发生率>10%的irAE包括反应性毛细血管增生症(RCCEP)、甲状腺损伤、皮肤损伤、肺损伤、肝损伤和血液毒性反应,发生率依次为37.5%(18/48)、18.8%(9/48)、16.7%(8/48)、12.5%(6/48)、10.4%(5/48)和10.4%(5/48)。与无irAE组患者比较,irAE组患者的ORR和DCR更高[64.7%(22/34)比3/14,91.2%(31/34)比9/14],中位PFS更长(12.0个月比7.0个月,风险比=0.418,95%置信区间:0.193~0.905),差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。 结论 卡瑞利珠单抗治疗NSCLC中发生的主要irAE类型为RCCEP,严重irAE较少。卡瑞利珠单抗治疗中发生irAE的患者可能有更明显的治疗反应。 Objective To explore the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and the relationship to efficacy of camrelizumab in treatment for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Clinical data of patients with NSCLC who received camrelizumab in at the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University from December 2020 to December 2022 were collected, and the efficacy of camrelizumab and the occurrence of irAEs were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into irAEs group and non-irAEs group according to whether they developed irAEs. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and progression-free survival (PFS) of the 2 groups were compared. Results A total of 48 patients were entered in the analysis, including 41 males (85.4%) and 7 females (14.6%), with an age of (65.9±7.4) years the median treatment cycle was 9 (6, 14) the overall ORR was 52.1% (25/48), the DCR was 83.3% (40/48), and the median PFS was 11 months. Among the 48 patients, 34 patients (70.8%) had 59 times of irAEs, of which 8 patients (16.7%) had at least one irAE of grade ≥3. The median time of irAEs occurrence was 5 (3, 7) treatment cycles. The irAEs with an incidence of >10% included reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (RCCEP), thyroid injury, skin injury, lung injury, liver injury, and blood toxicity, with the incidences of 37.5% (18/48), 18.8 (9/48), 16.7% (8/48), 12.5% (6/48), 10.4% (5/48), and 10.4% (5/48), respectively. Compared with non-irAEs group, patients in the irAEs group had higher ORR and DCR [64.7% (22/34) vs. 3/14, 91.2% (31/34) vs. 9/14] and longer median PFS (12.0 months vs. 7.0 months, hazard ratio=0.418, 95% confidence interval: 0.193-0.905), and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05). Conclusions The common irAEs of camrelizumab in treatment for patients with NSCLC was RCCEP, and fewer serious irAEs occurs. To a certain extent, patients who experience irAEs during camrelizumab treatment may predict a more pronounced therapeutic response.

    癌,非小细胞肺免疫检查点抑制剂抗肿瘤药药物相关副作用和不良反应卡瑞利珠单抗

    替雷利珠单抗致恶性肿瘤患者免疫相关不良事件的影响因素及其预测生物标志物的研究

    诸慧原永芳徐影蔡晧东...
    18-24页
    查看更多>>摘要:目的 探讨恶性肿瘤患者应用替雷利珠单抗治疗后免疫相关不良事件(irAE)的发生情况、影响因素及其预测生物标志物。 方法 收集上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院2020年6月至2023年6月应用替雷利珠单抗治疗至少1个周期恶性肿瘤成年患者的电子病历,对irAE发生情况和临床特征进行回顾性分析。按照患者是否发生irAE,将患者分为irAE组和非irAE组。比较2组患者的临床特征和相关生物标志物水平。采用多因素logistic回归方法分析患者发生irAE的危险因素。对有预测意义的生物标志物,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析其预测irAE发生风险的折点。 结果 共纳入患者107例,男性81例(75.7%),女性26例(24.3%),年龄(61±15)岁,其中25例(23.4%)判定为替雷利珠单抗相关irAE,6例(5.6%)严重程度≥3级。25例患者共发生28例次irAE,包括甲状腺功能异常9例次、免疫相关性肠炎4例次、皮疹4例次、免疫相关性肺炎3例次、肾损伤3例次、肝损伤3例次、免疫相关性肌炎1例次、高血压1例次。替雷利珠单抗开始治疗至irAE发生的中位治疗周期为3(1,5)个。25例患者irAE经停药和/或糖皮质激素及对症治疗后均好转,无因irAE死亡病例。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示基线中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)高是保护因素[比值比(OR)=0.453,95%置信区间(CI):0.279~0.735,P=0.001],而基线血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)高是危险因素(OR=1.006,95%CI:1.002~1.011,P=0.008)。ROC曲线分析结果显示,基线NLR和PLR预测irAE发生的折点分别为1.58(敏感度为0.988,特异度为0.644)和159.40(敏感度为0.800,特异度为0.524)。 结论 替雷利珠单抗治疗成人恶性肿瘤的irAE发生率为23.4%,以甲状腺功能异常最为常见,免疫相关性肠炎、皮疹、肺炎、肾损伤和肝损伤也值得关注。基线NLR和PLR可能作为预测irAE发生的生物标志物。 Objective To explore the occurrence, influencing factors, and predictive biomarkers of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in malignant tumor patients treated with tislelizumab. Methods The electronic medical records of adult patients with malignant tumors, who received tislelizumab for at least one cycle from June 2020 to June 2023 at Shanghai Ninth People′s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, were collected, and the occurrence and clinical characteristics of irAEs were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into irAEs group and non-irAEs group according to whether they had irAEs. The clinical characteristics and detection value of biomarkers in patients of the 2 groups were compared. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors of irAEs in patients. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to find the cutoff point of the biomarkers for predicting the irAEs. Results A total of 107 patients were entered, including 81 males (75.7%) and 26 females (24.3%), aged (61±15) years. Among them, 25 patients (23.4%) were diagnosed with tislelizumab-related irAEs, of which 6 patients (5.6%) had irAEs with a severity of grade 3 and above. A total of 28 irAEs occurred in the 25 patients, including 9 cases of thyroid dysfunction, 4 cases of immune-related enteritis, 4 cases of rashes, 3 cases of immune-related pneumonitis, 3 cases of kidney injury, 3 cases of liver injury, 1 case of immune-related myositis, and 1 case of hypertension. The median treatment cycle from the start of tislelizumab to the occurrence of irAEs was 3 (1, 5) cycles. After discontinuation of tislelizumab and/or glucocorticoids and symptomatic treatments, all 25 patients were improved. No deaths occurred due to irAEs. The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLP) at baseline was a protective factor for irAEs [odds ratio (OR)=0.453, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.279-0.735, P=0.001], while a high platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) at baseline was a risk factor (OR=1.006, 95%CI: 1.002-1.011, P=0.008). The ROC curve analysis results showed that the cutoff points of NLR and PLR at baseline for predicting the occurrence of irAEs were 1.58 (sensitivity: 0.988 specificity: 0.644) and 159.40 (sensitivity: 0.800 specificity: 0.524), respectively. Conclusions The incidence of irAEs in the tislelizumab treatment for adult malignant tumors was 23.4%. Thyroid dysfunction is most common and attentions should also be paid to immune-related enteritis, rashes, immune-related pneumonitis, kidney injury, and liver injury. Baseline levels of NLR and PLR may be biomarkers for predicting irAEs.

    免疫检查点抑制剂药物相关副作用和不良反应危险因素预测替雷利珠单抗

    海博麦布治疗高胆固醇血症有效性和安全性的meta分析

    方振威赵翊如张颖林阳...
    25-32页
    查看更多>>摘要:目的 评价海博麦布治疗高胆固醇血症的有效性及安全性。 方法 检索国内外有关数据库与临床试验注册网站(截至2023年3月27日),收集海博麦布治疗高胆固醇血症的随机对照试验(RCT)。试验组为海博麦布单药或联合其他降血脂药,对照组为安慰剂或与试验组相同的其他降血脂药。有效性主要结局指标为低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)的变化率,安全性主要结局指标为总体不良事件(AE)、严重AE(SAE)、因AE终止试验、与研究药物相关AE的发生率,安全性次要结局指标为≥2项研究中报道的主要AE发生率。使用RevMan 5.4软件进行meta分析。计数资料效应指标为相对危险度(RR)及其95%置信区间(CI);计量资料效应指标为均数差(MD)及其95%CI。 结果 纳入分析的RCT共4项,涉及1 488例患者,其中试验组952例,对照组536例。meta分析结果显示,治疗8~12周时试验组(海博麦布20 mg/d和10 mg/d联合或不联合阿托伐他汀10 mg/d)LDL-C降幅显著大于对照组(海博麦布20 mg/d:MD=-13.36%,95%CI:-15.28%~-11.44%,P<0.001;海博麦布10 mg/d:MD=-10.80%,95%CI:-14.90%~-6.71%,P<0.001);治疗52周时海博麦布20 mg/d或10 mg/d联合阿托伐他汀10 mg/d组患者LDL-C较基线平均下降幅度均明显大于阿托伐他汀10 mg/d单药治疗组的患者(-41.92%和-39.34%比-31.56%,均P<0.001)。试验组与对照组8~12周时的总体AE发生率[47.94%(338/705)比49.75%(202/406),RR=0.99,95%CI:0.87~1.12]、SAE发生率[2.64%(16/606)比2.79%(10/358),RR=1.19,95%CI:0.53~2.66]、因AE终止试验率[4.11%(29/705)比4.68%(19/406),RR=0.67,95%CI:0.17~2.65]和与研究药物相关AE发生率[12.38%(75/606)比11.45%(41/358),RR=0.87,95%CI:0.37~2.06]均相似(均P>0.05)。 结论 海博麦布可以有效降低高胆固醇血症患者的LDL-C水平,且安全性良好。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of hybutimibe in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. Methods Relevant databases and clinical trial registration websites at home and abroad were searched (up to March 27, 2023), and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of hybutimibe in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia have been collected. Patients in the trial group were given hybutimibe with or without other hypolipidemic agents, and those in the control group were given placebo or other hypolipidemic agents as same as that in the trial group. The primary outcome in effectiveness was the change rate of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). The primary outcomes in safety were incidences of overall adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), the trial termination due to AEs, and trial drug-related AEs. The secondary outcome in safety was incidence of the major AE reported in ≥ 2 trials. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. The effect sizes of counting data were expressed by the relative risk (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI). The effect sizes of measurement data were expressed by mean difference (MD) and its 95%CI. Results A total of 4 RCTs and 1 488 patients were entered in the analysis, including 952 patients in the trial group and 536 in the control group. The results of meta-analysis showed that at 8-12 weeks of treatment, the decrease rate of LDL-C in the trial group (hybutimibe 20 or 10 mg daily with or without atorvastatin 10 mg daily) was significantly greater than that in the control group (hybutimibe 20 mg daily: MD=-13.36%, 95%CI: -15.28% - -11.44%, P<0.001 hybutimibe 10 mg daily:MD=-10.80%, 95%CI: -14.90%- -6.71%, P<0.001) at 52 weeks of treatment, the average decrease rate (from baseline) of LDL-C in the trial group (hybutimibe 20 or 10 mg combined with atorvastatin 10 mg daily) was significantly greater than that in the control group with atorvastatin 10 mg daily monotherapy (-41.92% and -39.34%vs. -31.56%, all P<0.001) the incidences of overall AEs [47.94% (338/705)vs. 49.75% (202/406), RR=0.99, 95%CI: 0.87-1.12], SAEs[2.64% (16/606) vs. 2.79% (10/358), RR=1.19, 95%CI: 0.53-2.66], trial termination due to AEs[4.11% (29/705) vs. 4.68% (19/406), RR=0.67, 95%CI: 0.17-2.65], and trial drug-related AEs [12.38% (75/606) vs. 11.45% (41/358), RR=0.87, 95%CI: 0.37-2.06] were similar between the 2 groups at 8-12 weeks of treatment (all P>0.05). Conclusion Hybutimibe could effectively reduce LDL-C level in patients with hypercholesterolemia, with good medication safety.

    高胆固醇血症抗胆固醇血症药meta分析有效性安全性海博麦布

    基于山东省药品不良反应监测中心数据库的奥美拉唑不良反应风险信号挖掘

    张雪莲王冠杰王振华孙清海...
    33-37页
    查看更多>>摘要:目的 对奥美拉唑不良反应风险信号进行挖掘和评价,为临床安全使用该药提供参考。 方法 对山东省药品不良反应监测中心2018年1月至2021年12月收到的所有奥美拉唑不良反应报告进行数据清洗,收集患者性别、年龄,给药途径,不良反应累及系统/器官、临床表现及转归情况等信息;采用报告比值比(ROR)法、比例报告比值比(PRR)法和英国药品和保健品管理局(MHRA)综合标准法对与奥美拉唑相关的不良反应风险信号进行挖掘和评价。ROR法和PRR法的风险信号判断标准为报告数≥3,ROR或PRR的95%置信区间(CI)下限>1;MHRA综合标准法的风险信号判断标准为报告数≥3,PRR≥2且χ2≥4。 结果 以奥美拉唑为怀疑药物的报告共2 706份,其中严重不良反应234例(8.7%);男性1 270例(46.9%),女性1 432例(52.9%);中位年龄58岁,其中<18岁者86例,18~60岁1 417例,>60岁1 203例;奥美拉唑不良反应共累及17个系统/器官,按报告数排名前5位的依次为胃肠系统[1 412例次(37.6%)]、皮肤及其附件[883例次(23.5%)]、神经系统[716例次(19.1%)]、呼吸系统[269例次(7.2%)]及全身系统[207例次(5.5%)];不良反应中位发生时间为用药后30 min,发生在用药后1 d内的有1 710例(63.2%);1 595例(58.9%)患者痊愈,1 098例(40.6%)好转,无死亡病例。ROR法和PRR法分别挖掘出风险信号27个,MHRA综合标准法21个;采用ROR法挖掘出的信号强度排名前5位的不良反应分别为胃肠胀气、头痛、便秘、舌麻木和关节疼痛;采用PRR法挖掘出的信号强度排名前5位的不良反应分别胃肠胀气、头痛、便秘、舌麻木和眩晕;采用MHRA综合标准法挖掘出的信号强度排名前5位的不良反应分别为胃肠胀气、头痛、便秘、腹胀和口干。27个风险信号中,说明书未提及的有胸闷、寒战、紫绀、口麻木、全身颤抖、舌麻木。 结论 奥美拉唑不良反应涉及多个系统/器官,常见不良反应有胃肠胀气、头痛、便秘等,胸闷、寒战、紫绀、口麻木、全身颤抖、舌麻木等风险信号在说明书中未记载,临床应予以警惕并及时干预。 Objective To mine and evaluate the adverse reaction risk signals of omeprazole, and provide reference for the safe application of the drug. Methods Data cleansing on all adverse reactions of omeprazole collected in the Shandong Provincial Center for Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring database from January 2018 to December 2021 was performed, and information on patients′ gender, age, drug administration routes, and the systems/organs involved, clinical manifestations, and outcomes of adverse reactions was collected. The risk signals of adverse reactions associated with omeprazole were mined and evaluated using reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), and Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) comprehensive standard methods. The risk signal judgment criteria for ROR and PRR methods were the number of reports ≥3, and the lower limit of 95% confidence interval (CI) of ROR or PRR>1, and that of MHRA method was the number of reports≥ 3,PRR≥2, and χ2≥4. Results A total of 2 706 adverse reaction reports with omeprazole as suspect drug were entered, including 234 severe adverse reactions (8.7%). Of them, 1 270 were male (46.9%) and 1 432 female (52.9%) the median age was 58 years, including 86 patients under 18 years old, 1 417 cases between 18-60 years old, and 1 203 cases over 60 years old. A total of 17 systems or organs were involved in adverse reaction related to omeprazole, and the top 5 were gastrointestinal system [1 412 cases (37.6%)], skin and its accessories [883 cases (23.5%)], nervous system [716 cases(19.1%)], respiratory system [269 cases (7.2 %)], and systemic system [207 cases (5.5%)]. The median occurrence time of adverse reactions from medication was 30 minutes, and 1 710 cases (63.2%) occurred within 1 day after medication. After treatments, 1 595 patients (58.9%) recovered, 1 098 patients (40.6%) were improved, and no deaths were reported. Twenty-seven risk signals were mined by ROR and PRR methods, respectively, and 21 by MHRA method. The top 5 adverse reactions in signal intensity mined using the ROR method were gastrointestinal bloating, headache, constipation, tongue numbness, and joint pain the top 5 adverse reactions in signal intensity mined using the PRR method were gastrointestinal bloating, headache, constipation, tongue numbness, and dizziness the top 5 adverse reactions in signal intensity mined using the MHRA method were gastrointestinal bloating, headache, constipation, bloating, and dry mouth. Among them, the signals not mentioned in the labels were chest tightness, chills, cyanosis, mouth numbness, overall trembling, and tongue numbness. Conclusions The adverse reactions of omeprazole involve multiple systems/organs, and common adverse reactions include gastrointestinal bloating, headache, constipation, etc. Risk signals such as chest tightness, chills, cyanosis, numbness of the mouth, trembling of the whole body, and numbness of the tongue are not recorded in the labels, which should be vigilant and intervened in time in clinics.

    奥美拉唑药物不良反应报告系统信号处理,计算机辅助山东省药品不良反应监测中心

    基于美国FDA不良事件报告系统数据库的血小板生成素受体激动剂血栓栓塞和肝毒性风险信号挖掘

    梁翠绿张吟李菁锦
    38-43页
    查看更多>>摘要:目的 挖掘血小板生成素受体激动剂(TPO-RA)的血栓栓塞和肝毒性风险信号,为临床安全使用该类药物提供参考。 方法 检索美国FDA不良事件报告系统数据库,收集2008年10月至2023年9月收到的艾曲泊帕、罗普司亭、阿伐曲泊帕不良事件(AE)报告,根据《国际医学用语词典》25.0版系统器官分类(SOC)和首选术语(PT)对AE进行分类和标准化。采用报告比值比(ROR)法检测3种TPO-RA相关血栓栓塞和肝毒性AE风险信号。AE报告数≥3、ROR值95%置信区间(CI)下限>1的PT被定义为风险信号。 结果 以艾曲泊帕、罗普司亭和阿伐曲泊帕为首要怀疑药物的AE报告分别为25 215、18 762和1 204例,挖掘出艾曲泊帕、罗普司亭和阿伐曲泊帕相关血栓栓塞事件(TEE)PT 52、51和9个。艾曲泊帕信号强度居前5位的PT依次为肾动脉栓塞、门静脉血栓、脾栓塞、脾静脉血栓、肝动脉血栓;罗普司亭依次为动脉栓塞、脑血管闭塞、椎动脉闭塞、门静脉血栓、肠系膜血管血栓;阿伐曲泊帕依次为肾静脉血栓、门静脉血栓、脑静脉窦血栓、栓塞、深静脉血栓。分别挖掘出艾曲泊帕、罗普司亭、阿伐曲泊帕肝毒性风险信号(PT)25、14和4个,艾曲泊帕信号强度前5位的PT为门静脉扩张、门静脉血栓、肝动脉血栓、间接胆红素升高、慢性肝衰竭;罗普司亭为门静脉血栓、慢性肝衰竭、酒精性肝病、肝血肿、肝硬化;阿伐曲泊帕为门静脉血栓、肝功能检查异常、肝功能异常、肝酶升高。共挖掘出3种TPO-RA药品说明书中未记载的肝毒性相关PT 24个,信号强度居前5位者为门静脉扩张、慢性肝衰竭、肝功能检查异常、酒精性肝病、眼黄疸。 结论 TEE和肝毒性是3种TPO-RA共有的不良反应,临床应用TPO-RA前后应监测患者的凝血功能和肝功能,警惕药品说明书未记载的不良反应。 Objective To mine the risk signals of thromboembolism and hepatotoxicity related to thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) and provide references for safe use of these drugs in clinic. Methods Adverse event (AE) reports on eltrombopag, romiplostim, and avatrombopag from October 2009 to September 2023 were collected by searching US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database. AEs were classified and standardized according to the systematic organ class (SOC) and preferred terms (PT) of Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities version 25.0. The AE risk signals of thromboembolism and hepatotoxicity related to the 3 TPO-RAs were mined using reporting odds ratio (ROR) method. An AE with reports ≥3 and the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval of ROR >1 was defined as a risk signal. Results The number of AE reports with eltrombopag, romiplostim and avatrombopag as the primary suspect drugs were 25 215, 18 762, and 1 204, respectively. Fifty-two, 51, and 9 PTs of thromboembolic events (TEEs) related to eltrombopag, romiplostim and avatrombopag were mined, respectively. The top 5 PTs in the signal strength of eltrombopag were renal embolism, portal vein thrombosis, splenic thrombosis, splenic vein thrombosis and hepatic artery thrombosis. The top 5 PTs in the signal strength of romiplostim were embolism arterial, cerebral vascular occlusion, vertebral artery occlusion, portal vein thrombosis, and thrombosis mesenteric vessel. The top 5 PTs in the signal strength of avatrombopag were renal vein thrombosis, portal vein thrombosis, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, embolism, and deep vein thrombosis. In addition, 25, 14 and 4 PTs of hepatotoxicity related to eltrombopag, romiplostim, and avatrombopag were mined, respectively. The top 5 PTs in the signal strength of eltrombopag were portal vein dilatation, portal vein thrombosis, hepatic artery thrombosis, indirect bilirubin increase, and chronic hepatic failure. The top 5 PTs in the signal strength of romiplostim were portal vein thrombosis, chronic hepatic failure, alcoholic liver disease, hepatic haematoma, and hepatic cirrhosis. The PTs in the signal strength of avatrombopag were portal vein thrombosis, liver function test abnormality, hepatic function abnormality, and hepatic enzyme increase. A total of 24 PTs not recorded in drug labels of the 3 TPO-RAs were mined. The top 5 PTs in the signal strength were portal vein dilatation, chronic hepatic failure, liver function test abnormality, alcoholic liver disease, and ocular icterus. Conclusions TEEs and hepatotoxicity are common adverse reactions of the 3 TPO-RAs. The coagulation function and liver function of patients should be monitored before and after application of TPO-RAs. It should be alert for the adverse reactions not recorded in the drug labels.

    受体,血小板生成素血栓栓塞化学和药物性肝损伤不良反应信号检测艾曲泊帕罗普司亭阿伐曲泊帕

    信迪利单抗致甲状腺功能异常临床病例分析

    郑飞浪张琳王怡然王帅...
    44-49页
    查看更多>>摘要:目的 分析信迪利单抗致甲状腺功能(甲功)异常的发生情况和临床特征。 方法 研究对象选自2021年7月1日至2023年6月30日在长治医学院附属和平医院肿瘤科接受信迪利单抗治疗的恶性肿瘤患者。收集符合纳入标准患者的电子病历,记录其一般情况、信迪利单抗用药情况、联合用药情况和应用信迪利单抗前后甲功检查结果。对出现甲功异常的患者,应用Naranjo不良反应因果关系评估量表进行信迪利单抗与甲功异常的因果关系评价;根据评价结果为"肯定"和"很可能"者的病历资料,分析甲功异常的临床特征。 结果 纳入分析的患者共145例,24例(16.6%)发生信迪利单抗相关甲功异常,因果关系评估结果均为"很可能"。24例患者中,男性14例,女性10例;年龄37~87岁;信迪利单抗单药治疗者5例,联合化疗者16例,联合靶向药物治疗者3例。24例患者均有基线甲功检查结果,其中23例甲功正常,1例为亚临床甲功亢进(甲亢)。24例甲功异常包括甲功减退(甲减)13例、亚临床甲减5例、甲亢2例和亚临床甲亢4例;11例发生在3个用药周期内;严重程度均为1或2级,无明显临床症状,仅4例甲减患者轻度乏力。13例甲减患者给予左甲状腺素钠治疗后9例恢复或好转,4例病情持续但未加重。5例亚临床甲减患者有3例给予左甲状腺素钠治疗,其中2例恢复,1例演变为亚临床甲亢;余2例先行观察未予干预,后演变成甲减,给予左甲状腺素钠治疗后恢复。甲亢或亚临床甲亢的6例患者均未予干预,除1例亚临床甲亢自愈外,5例患者演变为甲减或亚临床甲减,给予左甲状腺素钠治疗后3例甲功恢复或好转,2例持续甲减但未加重。 结论 甲功异常是信迪利单抗较常见的免疫相关不良事件,以甲减为主;临床症状不明显,严重程度多为1或2级。使用该药时应常规监测甲功,出现甲减时可及时予左甲状腺素钠治疗,预后一般较好。 Objective To explore the occurrence and clinical characteristics of thyroid dysfunction caused by sintilimab. Methods The subjects were selected from malignant tumor patients who were treated with sintilimab during hospitalization in the Oncology Department in Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College from July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2023. Electronic medical records of patients meeting the inclusion criteria were collected the general conditions, sintilimab application, combined medication, and the thyroid function test results before and after sintilimab application were recorded. For patients with thyroid dysfunction, the causal analysis between sintilimab application and the dysfunction was conducted using Naranjo′s causality assessment scale. The clinical characteristics of sintilimab-related thyroid dysfunction were analyzed based on the medical records that had evaluation results of "certainly" or "probably". Results A total of 145 patients were included in the analysis, and 24 (16.6%) had sintilimab-related thyroid dysfunction, with the causality assessment results "probably". Among the 24 patients, 14 were male and 10 were female, aged 37-87 years 5 were treated with sintilimab monotherapy, 16 were with combination of chemotherapy drugs, and 3 were with combination of targeted drugs. All 24 patients had baseline thyroid function test results, of which 23 had normal thyroid function and 1 had subclinical hyperthyroidism. Twenty-four patients with thyroid dysfunction included 13 hypothyroidisms, 5 subclinical hypothyroidisms, 2 hyperthyroidisms, and 4 subclinical hyperthyroidisms 11 occurred within 3 treatment cycles the severity was grade 1 or 2, without obvious clinical symptoms, except that 4 hypothyroidism patients had mild fatigue. The 13 hypothyroidism patients were treated with levothyroxine sodium tablets (levothyroxine), 9 patients recovered or were improved, and 4 patients were with persistent but not worsening condition. Three of the 5 subclinical hypothyroidism patients were treated with levothyroxine, 2 patients recovered and 1 developed subclinical hyperthyroidism later the remaining 2 patients were given intensive monitoring without medication intervention, and they developed hypothyroidism later, which recovered after treatment with levothyroxine. None of the 6 patients with hyperthyroidism or subclinical hyperthyroidism received any intervention. Of them, 1 patient with subclinical hyperthyroidism was self-healed and 5 patients developed hypothyroidism or subclinical hypothyroidism later. After giving levothyroxine, 3 patients recovered or were improved and 2 had persistent but not worsening condition. Conclusions Thyroid dysfunction is the most common immune-related adverse events of sintilimab, mainly hypothyroidism. The clinical symptoms are not obvious, and the severity is mostly grade 1 or 2. When using sintilimab, the thyroid function of patients should be routinely monitored. When hypothyroidism occurs, timely supplementation of levothyroxine is recommended, and the prognosis is generally good.

    免疫检查点抑制剂甲状腺功能减退甲状腺功能亢进信迪利单抗免疫毒性

    替雷利珠单抗致肝损伤和糖尿病酮症酸中毒

    王雅之段方方李玥杨松...
    50-52页
    查看更多>>摘要:1例63岁女性食管癌患者,既往无慢性肝病和糖尿病史,手术后接受替雷利珠单抗200 mg静脉滴注、1次/21 d单药治疗。替雷利珠单抗第4个周期治疗后39 d发现肝功能异常,丙氨酸转氨酶494 U/L,天冬氨酸转氨酶442 U/L,碱性磷酸酶1 161 U/L,总胆红素21.4 μmol/L。停用替雷利珠单抗。经肝脏病理学检查及相关实验室检查排除其他原因导致的肝损伤,考虑其与替雷利珠单抗有关。给予甲泼尼龙(32 mg/d口服)及保肝治疗后,患者肝功能逐渐好转。甲泼尼龙治疗2周后,减量至16 mg/d,减量2周后发现患者空腹血糖升高至19.4 mmol/L。甲泼尼龙减量至8 mg/d,2 d后血糖升至33.7 mmol/L,血乳酸3.66 mmol/L,尿酮(++++),诊断为糖尿病酮症酸中毒,停用甲泼尼龙。实验室检查示空腹和餐后血胰岛素和C肽水平明显降低,提示胰岛功能损伤,考虑为替雷利珠单抗所致的1型糖尿病。经补充胰岛素、纠正酸中毒等治疗后患者肝功能好转。8个月后随访,患者肝功能恢复正常,但需长期依赖胰岛素控制血糖。 A 63-year-old female patient with esophageal cancer received tislelizumab monotherapy (intravenous infusion of 200 mg once every 21 days) after surgery. The patient had no disease history of chronic liver disease or diabetes mellitus. At day 39 after the fourth cycle of tislelizumab treatment, abnormal liver function was found, with alanine aminotransferase 494 U/L, aspartate aminotransferase 442 U/L, alkaline phosphatase 1 161 U/L, and total bilirubin 21.4 μmol/L. Then no further tislelizumab was given. After excluding liver injury caused by other reasons through liver pathological examination and relevant laboratory tests, it was considered to be related to tislelizumab. After giving methylprednisolone (32 mg/d orally) and liver protective treatments, the patient's liver function was gradually improved. After 2 weeks of treatment, the dose of methylprednisolone was reduced to 16 mg/d, and 2 weeks later, the patient's fasting blood glucose rose to 19.4 mmol/L. The dose of methylprednisolone was reduced to 8 mg/d. After 2 days, the blood glucose rose to 33.7 mmol/L, blood lactate 3.66 mmol/L, and urinary ketone (++++). Diabetic ketoacidosis was diagnosed and methylprednisolone was discontinued. The fasting and 2-hour postprandial serum insulin and C-peptide levels were significantly reduced, suggesting the damage of pancreatic islet function. Type 1 diabetes caused by tislelizumab was considered. After treatments such as insulin supplement and correcting acidosis, the patient's liver function was improved. At 8 months of follow-up, the patient's liver function returned to normal, but long-term insulin supplement was needed to control blood glucose.

    免疫检查点抑制剂食管肿瘤化学和药物性肝损伤糖尿病酮症酸中毒替雷利珠单抗