首页期刊导航|中华心律失常学杂志
期刊信息/Journal information
中华心律失常学杂志
中国医学科学院 中国协和医科大学心血管病研究所 阜外心血管病医院
中华心律失常学杂志

中国医学科学院 中国协和医科大学心血管病研究所 阜外心血管病医院

张澍

双月刊

1007-6638

zhxs@chinajournal.net.cn

010-68330771

100037

北京市西城区北礼士路167号

中华心律失常学杂志/Journal Chinese Journal of Cardiac ArrhythmiasCSTPCD
查看更多>>1997年创刊,中华医学会主办。本刊以从事心律失常学和心血管病专业的医生和研究人员为主要读者对象,报道心律失常学与心血管病领域中领先的科研成果和临床诊疗经验,反映我国心律失常学临床与基础理论研究的重大进展,促进学术交流,并为相关专业人员进行继续教育的国家级杂志。本刊已被中国科技论文统计与引文分析数据库等数据库收录。主要栏目:临床研究、基础研究、论著摘要、病例报告、建议和指南、学术争鸣、继续教育园地、研究生园地、新视野新技术、信息高速公路、述评、综述、讲座等。内容包括心律失常的发生机制、临床表现、心电图及其衍生的无创检查、心电生理检查,药物和非药物治疗技术、国内外学术动态、流行病学研究成果等。
正式出版
收录年代

    精彩2023:心律失常领域10大研究回顾

    张澍林娜
    1-4页
    查看更多>>摘要:年度"心律失常领域10大研究"的发布迎来了第12个年度。编辑部再度会同国内专家同道层层甄选出我们认为2023年全球最具影响力的心律失常领域10项研究,焦点涵盖抗心律失常药物治疗的新突破,心房颤动的新机制、治疗及抗凝的新策略、新时机,起搏疗法及室性心动过速消融的新器械、新进展、新证据等内容。愿与各位同道共同研讨心律失常领域的热点前沿,蜕故孳新,行稳致远。

    心律失常室性心动过速心房颤动心脏性猝死导管消融心脏起搏植入型除颤器抗凝

    心源性卒中的诊疗进展

    马雅军李淑娟樊颖婕
    5-8页
    查看更多>>摘要:心源性卒中(CES)是缺血性卒中的重要组成部分,占所有缺血性卒中的近30%。因其存在多种病因,且同一患者可能多病因共存,发病机制及临床情况十分复杂,国内外对CES诊断和治疗尚无统一标准。因此,了解CES诊疗的研究进展,加强对CES的认识,进一步探索不同病因CES最佳防治策略,将有助于提高CES的诊疗水平,为患者带来更多的临床获益。

    卒中心房颤动病因分类治疗策略

    标准化开展左束支起搏的时代已经来临

    蔡彬妮黄伟剑林娜
    9-12页
    查看更多>>摘要:大量临床研究证实了左束支起搏的可行性、安全性及有效性,近年来国内外相关指南统一了左束支起搏的定义及判断标准,并描述了植入方法及适应证。指南指导下标准化开展左束支起搏的时代已经来临,精准的传导束夺获判断和植入是实现高质量左束支起搏的关键。

    心脏起搏,人工左束支起搏传导束夺获生理性起搏希氏-浦肯野系统起搏

    如何优化左束支起搏植入的流程

    陈骁苏蓝徐世杰
    13-17页
    查看更多>>摘要:永久性左束支起搏(LBBP)因其生理性起搏的临床疗效和优势,近年来得到迅速推广和运用。但不同于传统心室起搏,LBBP术中需要电生理标测配合,流程相对复杂,耗时相对较长,不同术者对操作细节掌握程度不同,难以保证统一的手术质量。本文以单中心经验为基础,结合现有指南和共识推荐,从多导电生理仪设置、电极在右心室面拧入点选择、判断夺获传导束的敏感指标、控制电极拧入深度和准度的技巧等方面,对手术流程进行优化梳理,目的在于优化LBBP操作流程,以期帮助术者高效、高质量完成LBBP。

    心脏起搏,人工传导束起搏左束支起搏希氏束起搏心脏再同步治疗

    左束支起搏夺获的判断标准

    胡耿维侯小锋范桂娟
    18-22页
    查看更多>>摘要:左束支区域起搏(LBBAP)主要包括左束支起搏(LBBP)和左心室间隔部起搏(LVSP),既往研究表明LBBP比LVSP具有更好的电和机械同步性和临床效果,因此鉴别是否夺获左束支对恢复或保持左心室电和机械同步性是至关重要的。本文总结了左束支夺获的判断标准。

    心力衰竭心脏再同步治疗生理性起搏左束支起搏左束支电位判断标准

    心脏离子通道病和致心律失常性心肌病基因检测评估中国专家共识

    洪葵华伟张澍徐世杰...
    23-42页
    查看更多>>摘要:心脏离子通道病和致心律失常性心肌病具有猝死高风险。植入型心律转复除颤器(ICD)是目前最有效预防猝死的干预措施,但是仍有一部分患者未能得到早期风险评估而错失了ICD植入导致死亡。随着基因检测在这类疾病临床管理中的应用进展,本文参照国际相关指南,结合我国在该领域的成果报道,经中华医学会心电生理和起搏分会及中国医师协会心律学专业委员会组织国内有关专家共同讨论并撰写,旨在帮助心脏病学、遗传学等领域的工作者,对该类疾病患者的基因学评估和临床管理提供建议,为其制订ICD植入参考策略提供科学建议,从而降低猝死发生风险。

    离子通道病致心律失常性心肌病植入型心律转复除颤器基因检测评估专家共识

    院内症状性卒中患者临床特点及其预后相关研究

    张贵涛周琪琳冯瑶李淑娟...
    43-48页
    查看更多>>摘要:目的 分析院内症状性卒中患者的临床特点,探索院内卒中患者预后不良可能的危险因素。 方法 本研究为前瞻性病例对照研究,纳入2023年1月至9月在中国医学科学院阜外医院住院期间发生卒中患者,收集患者的一般临床特征、实验室检查、住院期间手术方式及卒中发病时美国国立卫生院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分。院内卒中后3个月时对患者进行随访,采用改良版Rankin量表评估患者神经功能预后,0~1分为预后良好,≥2分为预后不良。 结果 共纳入院内症状性卒中患者114例,年龄(61.88±12.41)岁,其中女36例(31.58%,36/114),既往合并卒中10例(8.77%,10/114),心房颤动(房颤)17例(14.91%,17/114)。相关性分析显示,发病时NIHSS评分与入院时尿素氮(r=0.27,P=0.004)及D二聚体(r=0.30,P=0.001)呈显著正相关。院内卒中后3个月随访,预后良好68例(59.65%,68/114),预后不良46例(40.35%,46/114)。房颤病史(OR=4.974,95%CI 1.147~21.562)、发病时中度(OR=11.195,95%CI 3.679~34.072)、重度(OR=25.043,95%CI 2.744~228.572)NIHSS评分是预后不良可能的独立危险因素。 结论 院内症状性卒中患者临床预后风险高,房颤病史、发病时NIHSS评分可能是预后不良的独立危险因素。 Objective To explore clinical characteristics and potential risk factors for poor prognosis in patients with symptomatic in-hospital stroke. Methods This is a prospective case control study. In-hospital stroke patients in Fuwai Hospital from January 2023 to September 2023 were enrolled. The clinical characteristics, laboratory tests, surgical information during hospitalization, and National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at the time of stroke onset were collected. Patients were followed up at 3-month after in-hospital stroke and the modified Rankin scale was used to evaluate the neurological function. The score of 0-1 indicated good outcome, whereas≥2 indicated the poor outcome. Results One hundred and fourteen patients with symptomatic stroke were included. The average age was (61.88±12.41) years. Among them, 36 (31.58%, 36/114) were female. Ten (8.77%, 10/114) patients were with prior stroke and 17 (14.91%, 17/114) patients were with history of atrial fibrillation (AF). The NIHSS score at onset was significantly positively correlated with urea nitrogen (r=0.27, P=0.004) and D-dimer (r=0.30, P=0.001) at admission. At 3-month after in-hospital stroke, 68 (59.65%, 68/114) patients had good functional outcome, whereas 46 (40.35%, 46/114) patients had poor outcome. The history of AF (OR=4.974, 95% CI 1.147-21.562), moderate (OR=11.195, 95% CI 3.679-34.072), and severe (OR=25.043, 95% CI 2.744-228.572) severity of stroke assessed by NIHSS maybe the independent risk factors for poor outcome. Conclusion Patients with symptomatic in-hospital stroke had a higher risk for poor outcome, and history of AF and the NIHSS score may be independent risk factors for poor outcome.

    卒中心房颤动美国国立卫生院卒中量表预后不良

    真实世界心房颤动合并急性冠脉综合征抗栓策略变迁与心源性卒中的关系

    梁翰阳张晗邵兴慧王娟...
    49-56页
    查看更多>>摘要:目的 探究真实世界心房颤动(房颤)合并急性冠脉综合征(ACS)人群的抗栓策略变迁及其对心血管不良事件的影响。 方法 本研究为单中心、前瞻性、观察性研究。选取2017—2019年于中国医学科学院阜外医院就诊的房颤合并ACS患者,根据抗栓策略分为抗凝治疗组与未抗凝治疗组,根据就诊时间将研究人群分为2017年组、2018年组、2019年组。对所有患者开展1年随访,主要终点为心源性卒中,次要研究终点为随访1年内发生主要不良心血管事件(MACCE),定义为全因死亡、心源性卒中、非中枢神经系统的体循环栓塞、心肌梗死、靶血管血运重建、缺血驱动的血运重建。 结果 共入选1 333例房颤合并ACS患者,其中男922例,年龄(68.3±9.7)岁。其中接受抗凝治疗患者534例(抗凝治疗组),未接受抗凝治疗患者799例(未抗凝治疗组)。与未抗凝治疗组相比,抗凝治疗组患者的CHA2DS2-VASc评分更高[(3.7±1.9)分对(4.3±1.8)分,P<0.001]。2017—2019年,接受抗凝治疗(P<0.001,P for trend<0.001)、口服抗凝药(OAC)+单药抗血小板治疗(SAPT)双联抗栓治疗(P=0.018,P for trend=0.006)以及OAC+双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)三联抗栓治疗(P<0.001,P for trend<0.001)的比例均逐年增加。主要终点方面,未抗凝治疗组1年内发生心源性卒中5例(0.6%,5/799),抗凝治疗组1年内发生心源性卒中19例(3.6%,19/534),Log-rank检验提示两者差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。2017年组发生心源性卒中10例(2.3%,10/429),2018年组发生心源性卒中9例(1.6%,9/573),2019年组发生心源性卒中5例(1.5%,5/331),Log-rank检验提示3者差异无统计学意义(P=0.604)。次要终点方面,未抗凝治疗组1年内发生MACCE事件75例(9.4%,75/799),抗凝治疗组1年内发生心源性卒中85例(15.9%,85/534),Log-rank检验提示差异存在统计学意义(P<0.001)。2017年组发生MACCE事件48例(11.2%,48/429),2018年组发生MACCE事件72例(12.6%,72/573),2019年组发生MACCE事件40例(12.1%,40/331),Log-rank检验提示3者差异无统计学意义(P=0.827)。 结论 在真实世界中,房颤合并ACS患者的抗凝治疗与联合抗栓治疗呈现逐年上升趋势,但心源性卒中及MACCE事件发生率未见明显改善,这可能与抗凝组CHA2DS2-VASc评分更高有关。未来应重点关注这一特殊人群的综合防控,并采取更加积极合理的抗栓策略。 Objective To analyze the antithrombotic strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) combined with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and their adverse cardiovascular events in real-world practice. Methods This research was a single-center, prospective, observational study. The patients with AF combined with ACS from Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Fuwai Hospital between 2017 and 2019 were selected, and were divided into anticoagulant therapy and non-anticoagulant therapy groups by physician′ experience and patients′ intention, and were also divided into 2017, 2018, and 2019 groups according to the time of consultation. One year follow-up was conducted for all patients, with the primary endpoint of cardiogenic stroke. The secondary study endpoint was defined as major adverse cardiovascular events (MACCE), including all-cause death, cardiogenic stroke, non-central nervous system embolism of the corpuscular circulation, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and ischemia-driven revascularization. Results A total of 1 333 patients with AF combined with ACS were enrolled in this study. Nine hundred and twenty-two patients were male, the average age was 68.3±9.7. Among them, 534 patients received anticoagulation therapy, and 799 patients did not receive anticoagulation therapy. Compared with non-anticoagulant group, anticoagulant group had higher CHA2DS2-VASc score (3.7±1.9 vs. 4.3±1.8, P<0.001). Between 2017 and 2019, patients who received anticoagulation (P<0.001,P for trend<0.001), dual antithrombotic therapy with oral anticoagulants (OAC) +single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT,P=0.018, P fort rend=0.006), and triple antithrombotic therapy with OAC+dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT, P<0.001,P for trend<0.001) increased by years. In terms of primary endpoint, cardiogenic stroke occurred in 5 patients (0.6%, 5/799) in the non-anticoagulant group, and 19 patients (3.6%, 19/534) in the anticoagulant group. Log-rank test indicated that the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). Cardiogenic stroke occurred in 10 patients (2.3%, 10/429) in the 2017 group, 9 patients (1.6%, 9/573) in the 2018 group, and 5 patients (1.5%, 5/331) in the 2019 group. Log-rank test indicated that there was no statistical significance between the three groups (P=0.604). In terms of secondary endpoints, 75 cases (9.4%, 75/799) of MACCE events occurred in the non-anticoagulant treatment group while 85 cases (15.9%, 85/534) occurred in the anticoagulant treatment group. Log-rank test indicated statistically significant differences (P<0.001). There were 48 MACCE events in the 2017 group (11.2%, 48/429), 72 MACCE events in the 2018 group (12.6%, 72/573), and 40 MACCE events in the 2019 group (12.1%, 40/331). Log-rank test showed no statistical significance (P=0.827) . Conclusion In recent years, anticoagulation and combined antithrombotic therapy in patients with AF combined with ACS showed an increasing trend year by year, but the incidence of cardiogenic stroke and MACCE did not improve significantly, which may be related to the higher CHA2DS2-VASc score in the anticoagulation group. Future studies should focus on comprehensive managements in this special population, and adopt more active and reasonable anti-thrombotic strategies.

    心房颤动急性冠脉综合征心源性卒中抗栓治疗抗凝

    V 1导联P波终末电势联合洛桑评分对缺血性卒中不良功能预后的预测价值

    裴璐璐柴源杨钧哲刘凯...
    57-63页
    查看更多>>摘要:目的 探讨V1导联P波终末电势(PTFV1)联合洛桑(ASTRAL)评分对急性缺血性卒中患者不良功能预后的预测价值。 方法 本研究是前瞻性队列研究,连续纳入2019年1月至2021年12月于郑州大学第一附属医院住院的发病7 d内的缺血性卒中患者。收集患者基线信息,测量患者PTFV1,计算ASTRAL评分。结局事件为1年不良功能预后(改良Rankin评分>2分)。通过建立Logistic回归模型,分析PTFV1对不良功能预后的预测价值。将PTFV1加入ASTRAL评分,拟合P-ASTRAL评分。通过绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,计算曲线下面积(AUC),验证模型的预测价值。 结果 最终纳入3 399例患者,年龄(59±12)岁,年龄范围14~95岁。其中男占70.3%(2 390/3 399),PTFV1增大的比例为8.8%(299/3 399)。与改良Rankin评分≤2分的患者相比,功能预后不良患者年龄更大(t=12.40,P<0.001)、男性更多(χ2=23.85,P<0.001)、有更多的危险因素[糖尿病(χ2=5.54,P=0.019)、既往卒中病史(χ2=56.38,P<0.001)、冠心病(χ2=22.72,P<0.001)]、PTFV1增大的比例更多(χ2=229.65,P<0.001)及ASTRAL评分更高(χ2=424.02,P<0.001)。矫正混杂因素后,PTFV1增大(OR=4.168,95%CI 3.101~5.602,P<0.001)及ASTRAL评分增加(OR=1.122,95%CI 1.097~1.148,P<0.001)是会增加1年不良功能结局的风险。ASTRAL评分对1年不良功能预后的预测价值高于ASTRAL评分(AUC:0.753对0.739,Z=2.317,P=0.021)。 结论 PTFV1是缺血性卒中患者不良预后的危险因素,P-ASTRAL评分可以提高对缺血性卒中不良结局的预测价值。 Objective To investigate the predictive value of adding P-wave terminal force in lead V1 (PTFV1) to ASTRAL score for poor functional prognosis in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Methods The study was a prospective cohort study. The hospitalized ischemic stroke patients within 7 days of onset from January 2019 to December 2021 in The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University were enrolled. The baseline characteristics were collected, the values of PTFV1 were measured, and ASTRAL scores were evaluated. The unfavorable outcome was defined as 1-year modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) >2. Logistic regression model was conducted to determine the association of PTFV 1 with unfavorable outcome. P-ASTRAL score was established by adding PTFV1 to ASTRAL score. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were plotted, and areas under the curves (AUC) were calculated to evaluate the prognostic significance. Results A total of 3 399 acute stroke patients were enrolled. The average age were (59±12) years old (range: 16-95 years), 70.3% (2 390/3 399) of patients were male, 8.8% (299/3 399) patients had an increased PTFV1 value. In comparison with patients with mRS≤2, patients with poor functional outcome were much older (t=12.40, P<0.001), had a higher proportion of male (χ2=23.85, P<0.001), had much more risk factors [diabetes mellitus (χ2=5.54, P=0.019), stroke history (χ2=56.38, P<0.001), coronary heart disease (χ2=22.72, P<0.001) ], had a higher proportion of increased PTFV1 value (χ2=229.65, P<0.001), and higher ASTRAL score (χ2=424.02, P<0.001). After adjusting confounding factors, PTFV1>5 000 μV·ms (OR=4.168, 95%CI 3.101-5.602, P<0.001) and ASTRAL score (OR=1.122, 95%CI 1.097-1.148, P<0.001) could increased the risk of 1-year poor functional outcome. TheAUC for P-ASTRAL score was higher than ASTRAL score (0.753 vs. 0.739, Z=2.317, P=0.021) . Conclusion PTFV1 was an independent risk factor of unfavorable outcome for stroke. P-ASTRAL score could improve the predictive value of poor functional outcome for ischemic stroke.

    卒中V1导联P波终末电势洛桑评分预测价值不良预后

    卵圆孔未闭相关心源性卒中的研究进展

    辛宜静杨艳敏徐世杰
    64-68页
    查看更多>>摘要:卵圆孔未闭(PFO)在年轻心源性卒中患者中检出率较高。且有越来越多的证据支持其与脑卒中相关。反常栓塞是传统上认为的PFO导致脑卒中的机制之一,但有研究者提出了其他可能的机制。对于伴有PFO的心源性卒中患者,在制定治疗策略之前,需要对PFO与脑卒中的相关程度进行评估,判断PFO是脑卒中的直接病因、危险因素或是偶然发现。多种因素可能与PFO引起脑卒中的风险相关。目前对经导管PFO封堵术的推荐级别越来越高,在药物治疗方面抗凝治疗是否优于抗血小板治疗尚存在争议。本文旨在归纳PFO相关心源性卒中的机制、风险程度评估及治疗进展。

    卵圆孔,未闭心源性卒中反常栓塞原位血栓卵圆孔未闭封堵术抗凝抗血小板