功能分析视角下仲裁第三方资助制度之取舍
Trade-off the Arbitration Third-Party Funding System from the Functional Analysis Perspective
叶广龙1
作者信息
摘要
在当前仲裁法修改的背景下,是否有必要在《仲裁法》中规定第三方资助,已成为广泛关注的议题.第三方资助作为一种新型融资手段,虽有助于帮助当事人接近正义,但在仲裁和金融监管方面也引发一系列负面问题.从功能分析视角审视,第三方资助在中国内地不过是一种"次优选择",尚无需通过立法进行规制.相反,我国可通过适当变通既有制度来满足当事人的融资需求,以确保在仲裁领域维护公平和公正的原则.
Abstract
In the context of the current amendments to arbitration laws,the question of whether it is nec-essary to regulate third-party funding in the Arbitration Law has become a subject of widespread atten-tion.Third-party funding,as a new type of financing method,holds functional value in assisting parties in seeking justice.However,this system has raised several negative issues in the realm of international ar-bitration and national financial regulation.To mitigate the impact of common law principles prohibiting maintenance and champerty on arbitration and to maintain the advantage of international arbitration cen-ters,Singapore and Hong Kong,after introducing third-party funding,have established alternative fee ar-rangements to better meet the financing needs of the parties.From the perspective of functional analysis,there is no immediate need for legislative regulation of third-party funding.Instead,China could adapt ex-isting systems flexibly to meet the financing needs of the parties,ensuring the maintenance of fairness and justice principles in the arbitration field.
关键词
国际商事仲裁/第三方资助/替代费用安排/功能分析Key words
international commercial arbitration/third-party funding/alternative fee arrangements/function-al analysis引用本文复制引用
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
维普
万方数据