首页|会计信息可比性、分析师跟踪与审计质量

会计信息可比性、分析师跟踪与审计质量

扫码查看
选取2000年至2022年沪深两市上市的3122家A股上市公司作为研究样本,研究会计信息可比性对审计质量的影响,并进一步分析了分析师跟踪对会计信息可比性与审计质量之间关系的调节作用.在实证研究时,选择审计意见激进度和实际审计意见作为审计质量指标,运用logit模型进行回归分析.实证研究发现:会计信息可比性提高将显著提高审计质量,会计信息可比性与审计质量正相关;分析师跟踪负向调节会计信息可比性与审计质量的关系,弱化了会计信息可比性对审计质量的正向作用.进一步研究还发现:会计信息可比性低的公司审计费用更高,会计信息可比性与审计费用负相关;四大会计师事务所审计的上市公司审计费用更高;更换审计师会降低上市公司审计费用.
Comparability of accounting information,analyst tracking and audit quality
This paper selected 3122 A-share listed companies listed on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets from 2000 to 2022 as research samples to study the impact of accounting information comparability on audit quality,and further analyzed the moderating effect of analyst following on the relationship between accounting information comparability and audit quality.In empirical study,we selected audit radicalness and actual audit opinion as audit quality indicators and used the logit model for regression analysis.The empirical study found that:Improving the comparability of accounting information will significantly improve audit quality,and the comparability of accounting information is positively correlated with audit quality;Analyst following negatively regulates the relationship between accounting information comparability and audit quality,weakening the positive effect of accounting information comparability on audit quality.Further research also found that:Companies with low comparability of accounting information have higher audit fees,and accounting information comparability is negatively correlated with audit fees;The audit fees of listed companies audited by the four major accounting firms are higher;Changing auditors will reduce the audit fees of listed companies.

Accounting Information ComparabilityAnalyst followingAudit quality

陈维龙、王芙蓉

展开 >

无锡开放大学 财经与管理学院,江苏 无锡 214011

会计信息可比性 分析师跟踪 审计质量

2024

安徽商贸职业技术学院学报(社会科学版)
安徽商贸职业技术学院

安徽商贸职业技术学院学报(社会科学版)

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.269
ISSN:1671-9255
年,卷(期):2024.23(1)
  • 7