Objective:This study was designed to investigate the effectiveness of the dual-track teaching model of PBL&CBL compared to traditional teaching in chronic refractory wounds and the value of its application in the teaching and training of plastic surgery residency trainees.Methods:Thirty-six regulatory trainees were selected as the subjects of this study and randomly divided into two groups of 18 each,who were trained in the two modes of teaching and learning,which were finally analysed and evaluated through written tests,skills assessment,case analysis and subjective questionnaires.Results:By analyzing the assessment results and questionnaire scores,compared with the students in the traditional teaching group,those who received the dual-track teaching mode of PBL&CBL obtained higher scores in the written test and skills assessment(P＜0.05),and in the case analysis assessment,the students in the combined teaching group obtained higher scores in five aspects:basic theory mastery,mind mapping,case analysis accuracy and completeness,clinical thinking ability,and clinical expression ability(P＜0.05).In the case analysis test,the participants in the joint teaching group had higher scores than those in the traditional teaching group(P＜0.05).The results of the questionnaire survey also showed that the trainees in the co-teaching group were more satisfied with the teaching mode they received,but the differences in the ratings of teacher satisfaction between the two groups were not statistically significant(P＞0.05).Conclusions:The dual-track teaching mode of PBL&CBL is conducive to the mastery and understanding of chronic wounds by plastic surgery trainees,and has a significant effect on enhancing the comprehensive ability of individuals and improving the teaching effect,which can be widely promoted and applied.
PBLCBLchronic refractory woundsstandardized residency training
NETL
NSTL
万方数据
