首页|神经内镜血肿清除术治疗高血压脑出血的疗效与安全性研究

神经内镜血肿清除术治疗高血压脑出血的疗效与安全性研究

Study on the efficacy and safety of neuroendoscopic treatment for hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage

扫码查看
目的:探讨神经内镜应用在高血压脑出血手术治疗中的疗效与安全性.方法:回归性分析在医院进行手术治疗的高血压脑出血患者150例为研究对象,根据手术方式分为两组,将行神经内镜血肿清除术的患者为研究组,行显微镜下开颅血肿清除术的患者为对照组,对比分析两组患者术前、术后血肿体积、GCS评分,以及术中出血量、手术时间与血肿清除率、术后6个月随访时的mRs评分.结果:两组患者术后血肿体积、GCS评分均显著改善(P<0.05),但两组患者血肿清除率、术后6个月随访时的mRs评分差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);研究组患者术中出血量、手术时间、术后GCS评分以及术后满意度均显著优于对照组(P<0.05).结论:神经内镜血肿清除术应用在治疗高血压脑出血中疗效肯定,具有创伤小、并发症低等优势,值得临床推广.
Objective:To investigate the efficacy and safety of neuroendoscopic treatment for hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage(HICH).Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on 150 patients with HICH who underwent surgical treatment at Changdu People's Hospital.Patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical approach:a control group receiving conventional mini-open craniotomy and a study group receiving neuroendoscopic-assisted surgery.Preoperative and postoperative hematoma volumes,GCS scores,intraoperative blood loss,operation time,hematoma clearance rate,and mRs scores at the 6-month follow-up were compared between the two groups.Results:Both groups showed significant improvements in postoperative hematoma volume and GCS scores(P<0.05).However,there were no statistically significant differences in hematoma clearance rate and mRs scores at the 6-month follow-up between the two groups(P>0.05).The study group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss,shorter operation time,and better postoperative GCS scores and postoperative satisfaction compared to the control group(p<0.05).Conclusion:Neuroendoscopic treatment for HICH is effective,with advantages such as minimal trauma and low complication rates,making it worthy of clinical promotion.

hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhageneuroendoscopymini-open craniotomytherapeutic effectsecurity

张琪、余正强、刘帅、杨烽

展开 >

昌都市人民医院神经外科 西藏 昌都 854000

高血压脑出血 神经内镜 微创开颅术 疗效 安全

2024

安徽医专学报
安徽医学高等专科学校

安徽医专学报

影响因子:0.441
ISSN:2097-0196
年,卷(期):2024.23(6)