首页|基于应急处置流程的应急工作手册设计与应用

基于应急处置流程的应急工作手册设计与应用

扫码查看
应急预案是指导应急处置的核心。在实际过程中,预案文本存在冗长或过简、可操作性差等常见问题,弱化了预案作为行动指导的作用。为了更好地提升专业人员开展应急处置的效率,基于处置流程,研究提出了应急工作手册的设计准则及内容框架,采用问卷调查和对比试验的方法评估了应急工作手册的有效性。结果显示,应急工作手册在创新性、可操作性、全面性、适用性、易懂性等5项指标中,获得了 99。48%以上的正面评价。在处置效率评估方面,相比于传统预案,应急工作手册可减少使用者大量的低效行为,在事件类型研判、确定响应等级和启动首个处置程序等3个环节中,使用者总平均用时由110。2 s缩减为25。2 s,降低了77。16%。应急工作手册的引导作用显著,可作为应急预案的重要补充,指导各类突发事件的应对工作。
Design and implementation of an emergency operations manual aligned with emergency response processes
To enhance the efficiency of emergency response by professionals,we propose a guideline and framework for an emergency operations manual rooted in the core processes of emergency planning.The manual features a modular page design,with each module dedicated to a specific operational process.A visual approach is employed to facilitate guidance through critical processes such as incident reporting,information dissemination,emergency response,and post-incident management.In terms of content,the manual has been optimized using the Incident Command System(ICS)series of resource management forms,seamlessly integrating record-keeping and archiving functionalities.It employs a card-scheduling method for open and flexible management and deployment of emergency resources.The effectiveness of the emergency operations manual was assessed through surveys and comparative experiments.The results indicated that the manual received exceptionally positive feedback in five key areas:innovation,operability,comprehensiveness,applicability,and understandability.Experts rated the manual highly,achieving a positive feedback rate of 99.48%.In quantitative assessments,the manual averaged 94.46 points across these five characteristics,which aligns closely with the qualitative analysis.In the efficiency assessment,comparative trial results revealed that the time difference in incident type analysis between Group A and Group B was not significant,with both groups functioning within a range of 3-8 s.However,during the incident level assessment,Group A averaged 15.6 s,while Group B took an average of 54.8 s.The disparity in response procedure initiation times was even more pronounced,with Group A averaging 5.1 seconds compared to Group B's 49.1 s.In the subsequent two stages,members of Group B without professional backgrounds took significantly longer than their counterparts with professional backgrounds,while this difference was not evident in Group A.In contrast to traditional emergency plans,the manual utilizes visual aids such as symbols,labels,colors,and codes,which reduce inefficiencies associated with flipping through documents,locating text,and comparing content.This enhancement promotes greater continuity in response actions.Overall,the total average usage time reduced from 110.2 s to 25.2 s,representing a decrease of 77.16%across the three experimental stages.

public safetyemergency plandisposal processemergency operations manual

孔胜利、陈文龙、郭文旭、王鹤天

展开 >

上海应用技术大学城市建设与安全工程学院,上海 201418

上海市消防救援总队嘉定区消防救援支队,上海 201821

公共安全 应急预案 处置流程 应急工作手册

2024

安全与环境学报
北京理工大学 中国环境科学学会 中国职业安全健康协会

安全与环境学报

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:0.943
ISSN:1009-6094
年,卷(期):2024.24(12)