首页|黄河下游粮食主产区生态风险演化及其驱动因素非平稳性

黄河下游粮食主产区生态风险演化及其驱动因素非平稳性

扫码查看
黄河下游粮食主产区生态资源独特、生态系统脆弱,评估其生态风险动态及影响因素,对于保障区域生态安全和粮食安全意义重大。以黄河下游粮食主产区为研究区,构建"驱动力-压力-状态-影响-响应-管理"(Driving Force-Pressure-State-Impact-Response-Management,DPSIRM)模型,探讨生态风险的时空演变,并基于地理探测器揭示生态风险驱动力,采用时空地理加权回归模型(Geographically and Temporally Weighted Regression,GTWR)分析主要驱动因素的时空非平稳性。结果显示:在2000-2020年,研究区生态风险等级为中等,总体呈先升后降的趋势,低风险区面积增加了 50 650。25 km2,高风险区由东向西迁移,面积减少了9 995。72 km2;研究区生态风险的核心驱动力是经济密度、GDP增长率、有效灌溉率和污水处理率,平均解释力均在50%以上,且社会经济因素与自然环境因素间的交互作用是造成生态风险空间分异的主要原因;生态风险驱动因素在时间和空间尺度上均表现出非平稳性,驱动强度和方向均存在差异。研究结果可以为黄河下游粮食主产区生态风险防范提供决策参考。
Dynamics of ecological risk and spatial-temporal non-stationarity of its driving factors in the major grain-producing areas of the lower Yellow River
This study used the major grain-producing areas of the lower Yellow River as the research zone and constructed the Driving Force-Pressure-State-Impact-Response-Management(DPSIRM)model to explore the spatiotemporal evolution of ecological risks.By using kernel density estimation,the dynamic evolution and aggregation trends of ecological risk were explored.The GeoDetector model was used to analyze the drivers of ecological risks,while the Geographically and Temporally Weighted Regression(GTWR)was employed to test the spatiotemporal non-stationarity of the main driving factors.The results suggest that,from 2000 to 2020,the driver subsystem varied most significantly in the study area,and the response subsystem was relatively stable.The internal spatial differences between the influence subsystem and the response subsystem were the largest,and the high-risk zone of each subsystem was more stable on the spatial scale.The comprehensive ecological risk level was medium,with a general trend of increasing and then decreasing.The area of the low-risk zone increased by 50 650.25 km2,the high-risk zone migrated from east to west and the area decreased by 9 995.72 km2,and the high-risk zone was mainly located in Zhengzhou and Jiaozuo in the Henan section.There was no significant difference in the distribution of the ecological risk in the Shandong section and no high-risk zone existed in this section.The core drivers of ecological risks were economic density,GDP growth rate,effective irrigation rate,and sewage treatment rate,all with an average explanatory power of over 50%.The interactions between socioeconomic and natural environmental factors were the primary reasons for spatial differentiation in ecological risks.Ecological risk drivers showed non-stationarity on time and spatial scales,with variations both in the intensity and direction of the drivers.In detail,economic density was positively correlated with ecological risk and the intensity of the impact weakening;the growth rate of GDP over the same period and the sewage treatment rate were negatively correlated with ecological risk and the intensity of the impact increasing;the impact of effective rate of irrigation on ecological risk changed both in the direction and intensity.

environmentalologyecological riskdriving force-pressure-state-impact-response-management modeldriving factorsnon-stationaritythe major grain-producing areas of the lower Yellow River

许静、陈根

展开 >

兰州财经大学经济学院,兰州 730101

兰州财经大学农林经济管理学院,兰州 730101

环境学 生态风险 驱动力-压力-状态-影响-响应-管理模型 驱动因素 非平稳性 黄河下游粮食主产区

2024

安全与环境学报
北京理工大学 中国环境科学学会 中国职业安全健康协会

安全与环境学报

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:0.943
ISSN:1009-6094
年,卷(期):2024.24(12)