首页|全程化疼痛管理在晚期肺癌骨转移疼痛患者中的应用效果

全程化疼痛管理在晚期肺癌骨转移疼痛患者中的应用效果

扫码查看
目的 探讨全程化疼痛管理在晚期肺癌骨转移疼痛患者中的应用效果.方法 选取126例肺癌骨转移疼痛患者,将2020年1月至2021年6月接受常规疼痛管理的68例患者作为对照组,将2021年7月至2022年12月接受全程化疼痛管理的58例患者作为观察组.比较两组患者的数字分级评分法(NRS)评分、爆发性疼痛发生情况、癌痛状况[美国疼痛学会病人结局问卷修订量表(APS-POQ-Medified)]、心理状态[抑郁自评量表(SDS)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)]、生活质量[欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生命质量测定量表(EORTC QLQ-C30)]及护理满意度.结果 干预后,两组患者NRS评分均低于本组干预前,观察组患者NRS评分低于对照组,对照组患者爆发性疼痛发生率为42.65%,高于观察组患者的13.79%,差异均有统计学意义(P﹤0.05).干预后,两组患者疼痛控制满意度评分均高于本组干预前,疼痛程度、疼痛影响、疼痛信念评分均低于本组干预前,观察组患者疼痛控制满意度评分高于对照组,疼痛程度、疼痛影响、疼痛信念评分均低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P﹤0.05).干预后,两组患者SDS、SAS评分均低于本组干预前,观察组患者SDS、SAS评分均低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P﹤0.05).干预后,两组患者EORTC QLQ-C30量表各维度评分均高于本组干预前,观察组患者EORTC QLQ-C30量表各维度评分均高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P﹤0.05).观察组患者的护理满意度为98.28%,明显高于对照组患者的80.88%,差异有统计学意义(P﹤0.01).结论 全程化疼痛管理应用于晚期肺癌骨转移疼痛患者中,能够明显改善疼痛程度和负性情绪,提高生活质量和护理满意度.
Application effect of whole course pain management in patients with advanced lung cancer bone metastasis pain
Objective To investigate the application effect of whole course pain management in patients with ad-vanced lung cancer bone metastasis pain.Method A total of 126 patients with advanced lung cancer bone metastasis pain were selected,with 68 patients who received routine pain management from January 2020 to June 2021 as the con-trol group,and 58 patients who received whole course pain management from July 2021 to December 2022 as the obser-vation group.The numerical rating scale(NRS)scores,incidence of explosive pain,cancer pain status[American Pain So-ciety-patient outcome questionnaire-medified(APS-POQ-Medified)],psychological status[self-rating depression scale(SDS),self-rating anxiety scale(SAS)],quality of life[European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire core 30(EORTC QLQ-C30)],and nursing satisfaction were compared between two groups.Result After the intervention,the NRS scores of the both groups were lower than those before the intervention,the NRS score of the observation group was lower than that of the control group,and the incidence of explosive pain in the control group was 42.65%,which was higher than 13.79%in the observation group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).After the intervention,the satisfaction scores of pain control in both groups were higher than those before the in-tervention,and the pain degree,pain impact,and pain belief scores were lower than those before the intervention,the sat-isfaction score of pain control in the observation group was higher than that in the control group,and the pain degree,pain impact,and pain belief scores were lower than those in the control group,the differences were statistically signifi-cant(P<0.05).After intervention,the SDS and SAS scores of the both groups were lower than those before the interven-tion,the SDS and SAS scores of the observation group were lower than those of the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).After intervention,the all dimensions of EORTC QLQ-C30 scale scores in both groups were higher than those before the intervention,the all dimensions of EORTC QLQ-C30 scale scores in the obser-vation group were higher than those in the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The nurs-ing satisfaction rate of the observation group was 98.28%,which was higher than 80.88%of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.01).Conclusion The application of whole course pain management in pa-tients with advanced lung cancer bone metastasis pain can significantly improve the degree of pain and negative emo-tions,improve quality of life and nursing satisfaction.

advanced lung cancer bone metastasiswhole course pain managementpain level

王炯琦、李娟、李雁、韦小白

展开 >

复旦大学附属华山医院静安分院急诊科,上海 200040

复旦大学附属华山医院静安分院肿瘤科,上海 200040

晚期肺癌骨转移 全程化疼痛管理 疼痛程度

国家自然科学基金

81903860

2024

癌症进展
中国医学科学院,北京协和医学院

癌症进展

影响因子:1.004
ISSN:1672-1535
年,卷(期):2024.22(1)
  • 1
  • 18