首页|新辅助内分泌治疗与新辅助化疗治疗激素受体阳性/人表皮生长因子受体2阴性乳腺癌的疗效比较

新辅助内分泌治疗与新辅助化疗治疗激素受体阳性/人表皮生长因子受体2阴性乳腺癌的疗效比较

扫码查看
目的 比较新辅助内分泌治疗与新辅助化疗治疗激素受体(HR)阳性(+)/人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)阴性(-)乳腺癌的疗效.方法 依据治疗方法的不同将110例HR+/HER2-乳腺癌患者分为对照组和观察组,每组55例,对照组患者给予新辅助化疗,观察组患者给予新辅助内分泌治疗,两组均于治疗后择期行手术治疗.比较两组患者的临床疗效、肿瘤标志物[糖类抗原125(CA125)、糖类抗原15-3(CA15-3)]水平、Ki-67表达情况、预后不良风险[术前内分泌预后指数(PEPI)]和不良反应发生情况.结果 观察组患者的治疗总有效率为85.45%,高于对照组患者的69.09%,差异有统计学意义(P﹤0.05).治疗后,观察组患者Ki-67高表达率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P﹤0.05).治疗后,两组患者血清CA125、CA15-3水平均低于本组治疗前,观察组患者血清CA125、CA15-3水平均低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P﹤0.05).观察组患者预后不良高风险发生率为12.73%,低于对照组患者的32.73%,不良反应总发生率为7.27%,低于对照组患者的36.36%,差异均有统计学意义(P﹤0.05).结论 新辅助内分泌治疗HR+/HER2-乳腺癌患者的疗效和预后均优于新辅助化疗,可抑制Ki-67的表达,降低肿瘤标志物水平,安全性较高.
Comparison the efficacy of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for hormone receptor positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative breast cancer
Objective To compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for hormone receptor(HR)positive(+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2(HER2)negative(-)breast cancer.Meth-od According to different treatment methods,110 HR+/HER2-breast cancer patients were divided into control group and observation group,with 55 cases in each group.The patients in the control group were received neoadjuvant chemo-therapy,while the patients in the observation group were received neoadjuvant endocrine therapy.The clinical efficacy,tu-mor markers[carbohydrate antigen 125(CA125),carbohydrate antigen 15-3(CA15-3)]levels,Ki-67 expression,risk of poor prognosis[preoperative endocrine prognostic index(PEPI)],and incidence of adverse reactions were compared be-tween two groups.Result The total effective rate of the observation group was 85.45%,which was higher than 69.09%in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).After treatment,the high expression rate of Ki-67 in the observation group was lower than that in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).After treatment,the levels of serum CA125 and CA15-3 in both groups were lower than those before the treatment,the levels of serum CA125 and CA15-3 in the observation group were lower than those in the control group,and the dif-ferences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The incidence of high-risk poor prognosis in the observation group was 12.73%,which was lower than 32.73%in the control group,and the total incidence of adverse reactions was 7.27%,which was lower than 36.36%in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The efficacy and prognosis of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for HR+/HER2-breast cancer patients are better than neoad-juvant chemotherapy,which can inhibit the expression of Ki-67,reduce tumor marker levels,and have higher safety.

breast cancerhormone receptorhuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2neoadjuvant endocrine ther-apyneoadjuvant chemotherapyclinical effect

倪健彬、王颖、吴祥虎

展开 >

信阳市中心医院肿瘤外科,河南 信阳 464000

信阳市中心医院妇产科,河南 信阳 464000

乳腺癌 激素受体 人表皮生长因子受体2 新辅助内分泌治疗 新辅助化疗 临床疗效

河南省科技攻关计划项目

192102310065

2024

癌症进展
中国医学科学院,北京协和医学院

癌症进展

影响因子:1.004
ISSN:1672-1535
年,卷(期):2024.22(1)
  • 25