Application effect of standardized pain intervention in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing surgery
Objective To explore the application effect of standardized pain intervention in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing surgery.Method A total of 198 patients with esophageal cancer surgery were divided into observa-tion group(n=99,standardized pain intervention)and control group(n=99,conventional pain intervention)according to different intervention methods.The self-perceived burden[self-perceived burden scale(SPBS)],stress response indexes[C-reactive protein(CRP),procalcitonin(PCT)],sleep quality[Pittsburgh sleep quality index(PSQI)],pain degree[nu-merical rating scale(NRS)],quality of life[functional assessment of cancer therapy-general(FACT-G)],hospitalization time and complications were compared between the two groups.Result After intervention,the dimensional scores of SPBS in the two groups were lower than those before intervention,and the dimensional scores of SPBS in the observation group were lower than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).After inter-vention,the levels of CRP and PCT in the two groups were higher than those before intervention,and the levels of CRP and PCT in the observation group were lower than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically signifi-cant(P<0.05).One and two weeks after intervention,the PSQI scores in the two groups were lower than those before in-tervention,and the PSQI scores in the observation group were lower than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).One,two and four days after intervention,the NRS scores in the observation groups were lower than those before intervention and the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).After intervention,the dimensional scores and total scores of FACT-G in the two groups were higher than those before intervention,and the dimensional scores and total score of FACT-G in the observation group were higher than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The hospitalization time of the ob-servation group was significantly shorter than that of the control group(P<0.01).There was no significant difference in the total incidence of complications between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Standardized pain intervention can reduce the self-perceived burden,stress response indexes and pain degree of esophageal cancer patients undergoing sur-gery,improve sleep quality and quality of life,and shorten hospitalization time.
standardized pain interventionesophageal cancerself-perceived burdenstress response indexsleep qualitypain degreequality of life
NETL
NSTL
万方数据
