首页|利那洛肽联合复方聚乙二醇电解质散对腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术患者结肠镜检查前肠道准备质量的影响

利那洛肽联合复方聚乙二醇电解质散对腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术患者结肠镜检查前肠道准备质量的影响

Effect of linaclotide combined with compound polyethylene glycol electrolytes powder on the quality of intestinal preparation before colonoscopy in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer radical surgery

扫码查看
目的 探讨利那洛肽联合复方聚乙二醇电解质散(SF-PEG)对腹腔镜经自然腔道取标本(NOSES)结直肠癌根治术患者结肠镜检查前肠道准备质量的影响.方法 依据结肠镜检查前肠道准备药物的不同将80例腹腔镜NOSES结直肠癌根治术患者分为常规A组(n=25,采用3L的SF-PEG行肠道准备)、常规B组(n=13,采用2L的SF-PEG行肠道准备)和联合组(n=42,采用2L的SF-PEG联合利那洛肽行肠道准备).比较3组患者肠道准备质量[波士顿肠道准备量表(BBPS)]、肠道气泡评分、结肠镜检查时间、阳性病变检出情况、全结肠检查完成情况、肠道准备耐受程度和肠道准备不良反应发生情况.结果 联合组患者左半结肠、横结肠和右半结肠BBPS评分和总分均高于常规A组、常规B组,气泡评分低于常规A组、常规B组,结肠镜进入时间、退出时间和总时间均短于常规A组、常规B组,阳性病变检出率和全结肠检查完成率均高于常规A组、常规B组,肠道准备总耐受率高于常规A组、常规B组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).常规A组与常规B组患者BBPS评分及总分、气泡评分、结肠镜检查时间、阳性病变检出率、全结肠检查完成率、肠道准备总耐受率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).常规A组、常规B组、联合组患者肠道准备不良反应发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 利那洛肽联合SF-PEG可提高腹腔镜NOSES结直肠癌根治术患者结肠镜检查肠道准备质量和肠道清洁度,提高肠道准备耐受度,且安全性较高.
Objective To explore the effect of linaclotide combined with compound polyethylene glycol electrolytes powder(SF-PEG)on the quality of bowel preparation before colonoscopy in patients undergoing laparoscopic natural ori-fice specimen extraction surgery(NOSES)colorectal cancer radical surgery.Method A total of 80 patients undergoing laparoscopic NOSES colorectal cancer radical surgery were divided into conventional group A(n=25,given 3 L of SF-PEG for bowel preparation),conventional group B(n=13,given 2 L of SF-PEG for bowel preparation),and combination group(n=42,given 2 L of SF-PEG combined with linaclotide for bowel preparation)based on the different drugs used for bowel preparation before colonoscopy.The quality of bowel preparation[Boston bowel preparation scale(BBPS)],intesti-nal bubble scores,colonoscopy time,positive lesion detection,completion of total colon examination,tolerance of bowel preparation,and incidence of adverse reactions were compared among the three groups.Result The BBPS scores of the left colon,transverse colon,right colon and total score in the combined group were higher than those in the conventional group A and conventional group B,while the bubble score were lower than those in the conventional group A and conven-tional group B,the entry time,exit time,and total time of colonoscopy were shorter than those in the conventional group A and conventional group B,the detection rate of positive lesions and the completion rate of whole colon examination were higher than those in the conventional group A and conventional group B,and the total tolerance rate of bowel prepa-ration were higher than those in the conventional group A and conventional group B,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).There were no statistically significant differences in BBPS score and total score,bubble score,colo-noscopy time,positive lesion detection rate,completion rate of total colon examination,and total tolerance rate of bowel preparation between conventional group A and conventional group B(P>0.05).There were no statistically significant dif-ferences in the incidence of adverse reactions in bowel preparation among the conventional group A,conventional group B,and combination group(P>0.05).Conclusion The linaclotide combind with SF-PEG can improve the quality of bow-el preparation and intestinal bubble in patients undergoing laparoscopic NOSES colorectal cancer radical surgery,im-prove bowel preparation tolerance,and have higher safety.

compound polyethylene glycol electrolytes powderlinaclotidecolonoscopybowel preparation qualityadverse reaction

杨静、魏倩、项志雄、吴当彦、林卓颖

展开 >

上饶市人民医院消化内科,江西 上饶 334000

复方聚乙二醇电解质散 利那洛肽 结肠镜检查 肠道准备质量 不良反应

江西省卫生健康委科技计划项目

202212723

2024

癌症进展
中国医学科学院,北京协和医学院

癌症进展

影响因子:1.004
ISSN:1672-1535
年,卷(期):2024.22(12)