首页|民国时期学者论法律学说

民国时期学者论法律学说

扫码查看
法律学说作为人类思想体系的重要组成部分,对法律发展与完善的重要性不言而喻,然而其地位一直以来都被实践所忽视。民国时期,现代法学研究初创,学者们基于主体、内容、形式等不同维度对法律学说的内涵有着不同理解。从狭义法律渊源——是否具备直接法律效力的角度,学者们并不认可学说的法源地位;而从广义法律渊源——构成法律的材料的角度,学者们则普遍认可学说是间接的法律渊源。实质上,前者已被包含在后者的语义之内。学者们通过将法律学说看作判例法、习惯法以及法理的一部分,间接赋予其法律效力的观点为学说的司法适用创造了可能。鉴于此,当前实务与理论上可以通过加强指导性案例对法律学说的适用,以及肯定法理与学说的法源地位的方式,逐步为法律学说司法适用的正当化与规范化指明方向。
The Study of Legal Doctrine by Scholars in the Period of the Republic of China
As an important part of the human ideological system,the importance of legal doctrine to the development and per-fection of law is self-evident.However,it has been ignored by practice.In the period of the Republic of China,modern legal re-search was initiated.Scholars had different understandings of the connotation of legal doctrine based on different dimensions such as subject,content and form.From the narrow sense of legal source-whether it has direct legal effect,scholars do not recognize the legal source status of the theory;However,from the perspective of legal sources in a broad sense-the materials constituting the law,scholars generally agree that the doctrine is an indirect legal source.In fact,the former has been included in the semantics of the latter.Scholars have created the possibility for the judicial application of the legal doctrine by taking it as a part of case law,customary law and jurisprudence and indirectly giving it legal effect.In view of this,in practice and theory,we can gradually point out the direction for the legalization and standardization of judicial application of legal doctrine by strengthening the application of guiding cases to legal doctrine and affirming the legal source status of legal theories and legal doctrine.

Legal DoctrineLegal SourceTheory of LawLegal EffectGuiding Cases

宋鹏

展开 >

西南政法大学行政法学院,重庆401120

法律学说 法律渊源 法理 法律效力 指导案例

&&

23SKGH015

2024

北方论丛
哈尔滨师范大学

北方论丛

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.192
ISSN:1000-3541
年,卷(期):2024.(5)
  • 17