首页|从管志道《大学》诠释看晚明"朱王之争"

从管志道《大学》诠释看晚明"朱王之争"

扫码查看
作为晚明阳明后学的中流砥柱,管志道依循学界共识即由《大学》介入和"朱王之争"的学术路径,倾力注解《大学》,先后完成《重订古本大学章句合释文》《古本大学辨义》和《石经大学测义》,以著述宏富、体例多样显立于晚明之际.在《大学》文本上,管志道既否定朱子的《大学章句》,亦不遵从阳明推崇的古本《大学》,而是声援和更补石经《大学》,形成特色鲜明的"管氏改本".在《大学》义理上,管志道辩难朱子和阳明,重申《大学》主旨在于述"帝王之事"而非"士庶之学",围绕《大学》的义理骨架"三纲八目",形成"双谴双取朱王"的学术立场.从管志道由经典诠释来回应时代思潮来看,"朱王之争"在晚明已然与经典诠释形成相互影响的关系,尤其是其主导的"双谴双取"的学术方案自成一家,成为解决"朱王之争"的一条相对客观、可行的路径,为我们构筑晚明"朱王之争"的理论图景,乃至管窥晚明的学术格局提供一个鲜活而生动的个案.
"The Debate Between Zhu Xi and Wang Yangming"in the Late Ming Dynasty:Observed from Guan Zhidao's Annotation and Interpretation of Great Learning
As a mainstayscholar among the followers of Wang Yangming School of Thought(阳明学派)in the Late Ming Dynasty,Guan Zhidao(管志道)pursued the academic path to participate in and respond to the"debate between Zhu Xi(朱熹)and Wang Yangming(王阳明)"as a national academic topic by starting from Great Learning(《大学》)in accordance with the consensus of the academia.He devoted himself to the annotation of Great Learning,and successively completed the Revision of the Interpretation of the Chapters and Sentences of the Ancient-edition Great Learning(《重订古本大学章句合释文》),the Meaning Differentiation of the Ancient-edition Great Learning(《古本大学辨义》),and the Interpretation of the Ancient-edition Great Learning Engraved on a Stone Tablet(《石经大学测义》).He stood out in the late Ming Dynasty for his rich writings and diverse styles.As to the text of Great Learning,Guan Zhidao rejected Zhu Xi's Chapters and Sentences of Great Learning(《大学章句》),and didn't follow the ancient-edition Great Learning which was highly praised by Wang Yangming.Instead,he enriched and supplemented Great Learning Engraved on a Stone Tablet,forming a distinctive revised-edition Great Learning by Guan Zhidao(管氏改本).As to the argumentation of Great Learning,Guan argued both Zhu Xi and Wang Yangming,reiterated that the main purpose of Great Learning was to narrate"the affairs of emperors"rather than"the learning of scholars and common people",and formed his academic standpoint of"mutual negation and mutual adoption between Zhu Xi and Wang Yangming(双谴双取朱、王)"around the"three principles and eight measures"(三纲八目).which constituted the framework of Great Learning.Guan Zhidao's response to the epochal trend of thought by his interpretation of classics showed that the debate between Zhu Xi and Wang Yangming in the late Ming Dynasty had formed a mutually complementary relationship with the interpretation of classics.And especially,he guided the academic program of"mutual negation and mutual adoption",which had become a relatively objective and feasible path to the solution of the"debate between Zhu Xi and Wang Yangming",thus providing a lively and vivid case for us to construct the theoretical prospect of the"debate between Zhu Xi and Wang Yangming",and even to use for reference the academic pattern of the late Ming Dynasty.

Guan Zhidao(管志道)Great Learning(《大学》)Late Ming Dynastydebate between Zhu Xi and Wang Yangming(朱、王之争)mutual negation and mutual adoption

李敬峰

展开 >

陕西师范大学哲学学院,西安 710119

管志道 《大学》 晚明 "朱王之争" 双谴双取

国家社会科学基金重点项目

23AZX011

2024

北京大学学报:哲学社会科学版
北京大学

北京大学学报:哲学社会科学版

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.963
ISSN:1000-5919
年,卷(期):2024.61(3)