法律渊源:这个概念如何有意义?
Legal Source:How Does This Concept Work?
陈景辉1
作者信息
- 1. 中国人民大学法学院,北京 100872
- 折叠
摘要
法律渊源传统上指的是法律的表现形式,但它由于无法为法律渊源提供表现形式之外的新因素,最终陷入概念冗余、内容空洞和缺乏实践意义的窘境.因此,目前的主流看法是,法律渊源指的是裁判根据的总和,而非法律的表现形式.但这个看起来当然成立的主张,很难避免将裁判根据限于表现形式的说法,而且更重要的是,它还必须承诺"判决是法律"的错误主张.所以,对法律渊源的最佳理解是,它是法律的应然表现形式,而不是实际的表现形式,并且这还会得出法律的存在与内容唯一取决于事实的渊源命题.
Abstract
Traditionally,it was believed that legal source referred to legal manifestation.However,as this understanding could not provide legal source with new factors apart from legal manifestation,ultimately it would lead to the dilemma of conceptual redundancy,emptiness of contents,and lack of practical significance.According to the current mainstream view,therefore,legal source refers to the total amount of bases of judgment,rather than legal manifestation.But it is difficult for this seemingly valid claim to avoid the statement that the basis of judgment is confined to the manifestation,and more importantly,it must also admit the erroneous claim that"the judgment is law".So,the best understanding of legal source is that it is the legal manifestation as it ought to be,rather than the legal manifestation as it is,and this will also lead to the source proposition about the nature of law,i.e.,legal existence and legal contents can only be identified by reference to social facts.
关键词
法律渊源/法律的表现形式/裁判根据/应然表现形式/来源命题Key words
legal source/legal manifestation/basis of judgment/manifestation as it ought to be/source proposition引用本文复制引用
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据