首页|从"亲权"到"亲责":家庭教育的司法介入

从"亲权"到"亲责":家庭教育的司法介入

扫码查看
家庭教育由"家事"上升为"国事"后,司法部门介入家庭教育是《中华人民共和国家庭教育促进法》(下文简称"《家庭教育促进法》")实施的实践性抓手,以"训诫—指导—处罚"的层层递进的惩戒措施体现了《家庭教育促进法》的司法柔性、司法韧性与司法刚性.《家庭教育促进法》在删除了《家庭教育法(草案)》的诸多负面惩罚性措施的同时,并未充分补足支持性措施,导致在实践中司法部门无法准确回应"何时"介入与"如何"介入的问题.欲实现家庭教育与司法介入的"德法相融",需要平衡比例原则下司法部门介入家庭教育的必要性限度,保持谦抑立场,同时也需要提升规范性与强制性,增强家庭教育令的司法张力.
From"Parental Power"to"Parental Responsibility":Judicial Promotion of Family Education
After the rise of family education from"family affairs"to"national affairs",the intervention of the judicial department in family education is a practical lever for the implementation of the"Family Education Pro-motion Law".The progressive punitive measures of"admonition-guidance-punishment"reflect the judicial flex-ibility,judicial resilience,and judicial rigidity of the"Family Education Promotion Law".The Family Education Promotion Law,while removing many negative punitive measures from the Draft Family Education Law,has not fully supplemented supportive measures,resulting in the inability of the judicial mechanism to accurately re-spond to the issues of"when"and"how"to intervene in practice.To achieve the integration of morality and law between family education and judicial intervention,it is necessary to balance the necessity of judicial interven-tion in family education under the principle of proportionality,maintain a humble stance,and at the same time,improve standardization and compulsion,and enhance the judicial tension of the family education orders.

Family Education Promotion Lawjudicial departmentfamily educationgood family culture

徐婧

展开 >

福州大学法学院,福州 350108

家庭教育促进法 司法部门 家庭教育 优良家风

2025

北京科技大学学报(社会科学版)
北京科技大学

北京科技大学学报(社会科学版)

影响因子:0.444
ISSN:1008-2689
年,卷(期):2025.41(2)