编辑学报2024,Vol.36Issue(1) :43-47.DOI:10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2024.01.008

安全视角下的审稿人失误分类研究及相关建议

Human error of reviewers influencing factors categorization and relevant suggestions from a safety perspective

耿枢馨
编辑学报2024,Vol.36Issue(1) :43-47.DOI:10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2024.01.008

安全视角下的审稿人失误分类研究及相关建议

Human error of reviewers influencing factors categorization and relevant suggestions from a safety perspective

耿枢馨1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 中国铁道科学研究院集团有限公司铁道科学技术研究发展中心,100081,北京
  • 折叠

摘要

为了更好地保障并促进同行评议的平稳可靠运转,引入安全相关理论,从人的角度研究审稿人失误问题.聚焦微观层面,以围绕某一期刊而形成有机整体作为同行评议体系,抽象得到体系构成并分析其特点.在划分4种审稿人失误类型的基础上,分析造成失误的原因.针对期刊提出有利于预防审稿人失误的相关建议:源头治理事前防范,为审稿人筛选和稿件送审把好关;精细管理提升效能,在编审关系管理上做实做细;文化浸润塑造观念,引导同行评议氛围向好发展.

Abstract

In order to bettersafeguard and promote the reliability of the peer review,the paper introduced safety theories to study the problem of reviewer errors from the human perspective.Focusing on the micro level and taking the organic whole formed around acertain journal as a peer review system,we abstract the system composition and analyze its characteristics.Based on the classification of 4 types of reviewer errors,the causes of reviewer errors were analyzed.It proposes recommendations for journals to prevent reviewer errors,which arerespectively:to prevent at the source of governance beforehand,to keep a good gate for the screening of reviewers and the delivery of manuscripts for review;to enhance the effectiveness of fine management,to do a solid and detailed job in the management of editing and reviewing relationship;and to shape the concepts by infiltrating the culture and guiding the development,to keep the atmosphere of peer review in a good direction.

关键词

同行评议/审稿人/安全/人因失误

Key words

peer review/reviewer/security/human error

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
编辑学报
中国科学技术期刊编辑学会

编辑学报

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.399
ISSN:1001-4314
参考文献量12
段落导航相关论文