科技期刊选用作者推荐审稿人的分析与思考
Analysis and reflection on results of author-recommended reviewers
刘晓艳1
作者信息
摘要
分析《河海大学学报(自然科学版)》115位推荐审稿人审稿结果发现,选用作者推荐审稿人可缩短审稿周期,但其容易给出过誉的审稿结论,造成稿件录用率虚高,延长稿件出版周期.为充分发挥推荐审稿人的作用,结合编辑部实际工作给出如下建议:制定详细推荐标准,引导作者正确、合理推荐审稿人;利用大数据、互联网等手段,合理选用推荐审稿人;将推荐审稿人列为约稿对象、精准向其推送相关论文,最大化发挥其作用;建立健全评价体系,提高审稿质量.
Abstract
Based on analysis of the review results of 115 author-recommended reviewers in Journal of Hohai University(Natural Sciences),it suggested that the selection of author-recommended reviewers can shorten the review cycle,but with a tendency for these reviewers to give overly favorable conclusion,resulting in an artificially high acceptance rate and prolonged publication cycle.In order to give full play to the role of author-recommended reviewers,the following suggestions are given based on the actual work of the editorial department:establish detailed recommendation criteria to guide authors in correctly and reasonably nominating reviewers;employ big data and the internet to make judicious selections of recommended reviewers;maximize the role of the recommended reviewers by listing them.as solicitation targets and precisely pushing relevant papers to them;establish a sound evaluation system to improve the quality of review.
关键词
科技期刊/作者推荐审稿人/同行评议/审稿专家Key words
scientific journal/reviewer recommended by author/peer reviewer/reviewers引用本文复制引用
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据