技术"自定人"的存在论疑难与道德可能解
The Existentialist Difficulty and Moral Possible Solution of Technologically"Self-defined Man"
赵旭 1赵屹璇 1李雪松1
作者信息
- 1. 昆明理工大学 马克思主义学院,昆明 650504
- 折叠
摘要
在"命定"论所遵循的既定命运框架之中,存在着一定的解释空间或罅隙,这些空间构成了"自定"论的出场逻辑,其也为个体主体性的无限发挥与自我塑造奠定了理论基础.技术"自定人"旨在变"自然人"为"人化神",人兼备人的功能和神的属性,是宏观人与宇观神的二元共体.由于技术"自定人"的临场排挤了人在自然中的原初地位,其正面临前所未有的存在论危机,于是,技术"自定人"的存在论疑难导出了三大道德可能解,即抑制主体性的过度泛滥、建构人类生活的集体理性和以"最大幸福原则"作为价值准则.
Abstract
Within the predetermined fate framework followed by the theory of"destiny",there exists a certain explanatory space or gap,which constitutes the logic of the emergence of the theory of"self-de-termination"and lays the theoretical foundation for the infinite expression and self shaping of individu-al subjectivity.The technology of"self defined man"aims to transform"natural humans"into"human-ized gods".Humans possess both human functions and divine attributes,and are a combination of mac-ro humans and universal gods.Due to the on-site exclusion of human beings from their original position in nature by technology's"self definition",they are facing an unprecedented existential crisis.There-fore,the existential dilemma of technology's"self defined"has led to three possible moral solutions:in-hibiting the excessive proliferation of subjectivity,constructing collective rationality for human life,and using the"principle of maximum happiness"as a value criterion.
关键词
技术/"自定人"/人类/存在/主体性Key words
Technology/"Self defined man"/Man/Existence/Subjectivity引用本文复制引用
出版年
2025
NETL
NSTL
万方数据