首页|基于探地雷达、CT扫描和室内试验的路面空隙率计算方法比较研究

基于探地雷达、CT扫描和室内试验的路面空隙率计算方法比较研究

扫码查看
路基的孔隙度与压实度是高速公路在施工时必须严格控制的重要技术指标,其一旦达不到标准,会严重影响高速公路日后的使用性能.为了探究不同路面空隙率计算方法的最佳方法,本文对探地雷达、CT扫描和室内试验这三种常用的路面空隙率计算方法进行对比.利用试验路段采集到的雷达数据结合ALL模型计算空隙率,采用X射线CT扫描路面芯样,对芯样进行室内网篮法试验计算空隙率.通过对比三种方法的计算误差值来选取计算路面空隙率的最佳方法.通过试验得出结论:CT 断层扫描法与网篮法计算的空隙率平均相对误差为 7%,探地雷达法与网篮法计算的空隙率平均相对误差为 12%.虽然探地雷达相较于其他两类方法误差略大,但是这种方法快速高效且经济,适用于大范围普查.
Research on Automatic Recognition of Multi-class Pavement Disease Based on Convolutional Neural Network
The void ratio and compaction of pavement are the indexes that need to be strictly controlled in the construction of highway,which will greatly affect the performance of highway in the future if it fails to meet the requirements.In order to explore the best method of different pavement void ratio calculation methods,this paper compares three commonly used pavement void ratio calculation methods of ground-penetrating radar,CT scanning and indoor testing.Firstly,the clearance rate is calculated by using the radar data collected from the test section combined with the ALL model,secondly,the pavement core samples are scanned by X-ray CT scanning,and in addition,the clearance rate is calculated by conducting indoor net-basket test on the core samples.By comparing the calculation error values of the three methods,the best method for calculating the pavement void ratio was selected.Through the test,it is concluded that the average relative error between the CT tomography method and the net basket method is 7%,the average relative error between the ground-penetrating radar method and the net basket method is 12%.The ground-penetrating radar method has a slightly larger error than the other two methods,but it is fast,efficient,and economical,and is suitable for large-scale census.

void ratio testing methodsground-penetrating radar(GPR)X-raynon-contactlaboratory testing

于颖、黄文清、程俭廷、崔志猛、王庆

展开 >

广州诚安路桥检测有限公司,广东 广州 510420

广州诚泰交通科技有限公司,广东 广州 510420

广州市道路研究院有限公司,广东 广州 510420

空隙率测试法 探地雷达 X射线 非接触式 室内试验

2024

交通节能与环保
人民交通出版社股份有限公司,交通运输部公路科学研究院

交通节能与环保

影响因子:0.286
ISSN:1673-6478
年,卷(期):2024.20(6)