出版科学2024,Vol.32Issue(1) :12-18.

编辑概念的认识论反思——以"两种编辑"概念讨论为中心

Epistemological Reflection on the Concept of Editing——Focusing on the Discussion of the Concept of"Two Kinds of Editing"

段乐川
出版科学2024,Vol.32Issue(1) :12-18.

编辑概念的认识论反思——以"两种编辑"概念讨论为中心

Epistemological Reflection on the Concept of Editing——Focusing on the Discussion of the Concept of"Two Kinds of Editing"

段乐川1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 北京外国语大学国际新闻与传播学院,北京,100089
  • 折叠

摘要

在编辑概念界定的过程中,曾出现过"两种编辑"概念的讨论.一种从出版职业性出发来认识编辑概念,把其明确为编辑走向职业化之后的产物;另一种秉持编辑活动"古已有之"的观点,把其界定为古今同质的文化创构活动."两种编辑"概念差异的背后是基于认识论的不同而形成的不同概念认知逻辑.前者接近一种建构主义的认识论,后者则是本质主义的认识论.编辑概念的科学认知,不仅要正视两种认识论的差异,更要实现认识论的革新转向,即从"作为方法的概念"到"作为概念的方法",从"作为历史的概念"到"作为实践的概念"的转变.

Abstract

In the process of defining the concept of editing,there has been a discussion on the concept of"two types of editing".One perspective originates from the professionalization of the publishing industry,defining editing as a product that emerges after the professionalization of editing.The other perspective,rooted in the belief that editing activities have existed since ancient times,defines editing as a cultural construction activity that has remained homogeneous throughout history.The divergence between the concepts of"two types of editing"is based on different epistemological perspectives,with the former leaning towards a constructivist epistemology and the latter adhering to an essentialist epistemology.The scientific cognition of the editing concept requires not only acknowledging the differences between these epistemologies but also a transformative shift in epistemology-a transition from"concept as a method"to"method as a concept",and from"concept as history"to"concept as practice".

关键词

编辑概念/认识论/本质主义/建构主义

Key words

Concept of editing/Epistemology/Essentialism/Constructivism

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

国家社会科学基金(20BXW026)

出版年

2024
出版科学
湖北省编辑学会

出版科学

CSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.562
ISSN:1009-5853
参考文献量24
段落导航相关论文