首页|乳腺MRI图像特征与保乳手术可行性的相关性分析

乳腺MRI图像特征与保乳手术可行性的相关性分析

扫码查看
目的 探讨乳腺癌保乳手术(breast conserving surgery,BCS)成功及失败相关的术前MRI影像特征和临床病理特征,为BCS可行性分析提供影像学依据.材料与方法 回顾性分析2018年3月至2021年5月行BCS且术前行MRI检查的患者资料,并根据是否最终改行全乳切除术的手术结果分为失败组和成功组.收集的影像特征包括:病灶大小、左右侧、是否肿块、深度、纤维腺体组织量、是否对称、相关征象、背景实质强化(background parenchymal enhancement,BPE)、时间强度曲线、T1信号以及T2信号.临床病理特征包括:患者年龄、人表皮生长因子受体2(human epidermal growth factor receptor 2,HER-2)、雌激素受体(estrogen receptor,ER)、孕激素受体(progesterone receptor,PR)状态及增殖指数Ki-67水平、分子分型以及是否导管内癌.采用单因素及多因素logistic回归对两组间的影像特征及临床病理特征进行分析,以P<0.05为差异具有统计学意义.结果 BCS失败和成功组的样本量分别为47例和91例.单因素及多因素logistic回归分析显示BPE在两组间差异有统计学意义.使用BPE极少强化作为参考,它与BPE轻度强化之间差异没有统计学意义[优势比(odds ratio,OR)=0.317,95%置信区间(confidence interval,CI):0.374~6.552,P=0.654].它与中度强化之间差异具有统计学意义(OR=1.674,95%CI:1.392~26.420,P=0.022)和 BPE重度增强(OR=1.569,95%CI:1.128~25.809,P=0.044).然而,其他临床病理和影像学特征在BCS成功组与失败组间差异无统计学意义.结论 BPE与BCS成功与否具有一定相关性,更高的BPE程度提示更大的BCS失败可能性,BPE可能作为术前MRI评估乳腺癌BCS可行性分析的有效指标,有助于医生制订准确的手术策略.
Correlation analysis of MRI features of breast and feasibility of breast conserving surgery
Objective:To investigate the preoperative MRI features and clinicopathological features associated with breast conserving surgery(BCS)failure and success.Materials and Methods:The data of patients who planned to undergo BCS and underwent preoperative MRI examination from March 2018 to May 2021 were retrospectively analyzed,and divided into failure group and success group according to whether convert to mastectomy.Image features collected included:size,right and left side,whether the mass was a mass,depth,amount of fibroglandular tissue,whether it was symmetrical,associated signs,background parenchymal enhancement(BPE),temporal intensity profile,T1 signal,and T2 signal.Clinicopathological features included patient age,human epidermal growth factor receptor 2(HER-2),estrogen receptor(ER),progesterone receptor(PR),proliferation-marker Ki-67,molecular subtype,and intraductal carcinoma or not.Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyze the imaging features and clinicopathological features between the two groups,and differences were considered statistically significant at P<0.05.Results:The sample sizes of the BCS failure and success groups were 47 and 91 respectively.Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that BPE was significantly different between the two groups.Using BPE minimal reinforcement as a reference,there was no statistical difference between it and BPE mild reinforcement[dominance ratio(OR)=0.317,95%confidence interval(CI):0.374-6.552,P=0.654]There was a statistical difference between it and moderate enhancement(OR=1.674,95%CI:1.392-26.420,P=0.022)and heavy enhancement of BPE(OR=1.569,95%CI:1.128-25.809,P=0.044).However,there was no significant difference in other clinicopathological and imaging features between failure group and success group.Conclusions:BPE has a certain correlation with the success of BCS,higher BPE levels suggest a greater likelihood of BCS failure,which may be used as an effective indicator for the feasibility analysis of preoperative MRI evaluation of BCS and the formulation of accurate surgical strategies.

cancerbreast cancerbreast conserving surgeryimage featuresmagnetic resonance imaging

刘梁生、刘佩芳、马文娟、张宇、李艳博、王嘉慧、路红

展开 >

天津医科大学肿瘤医院乳腺影像诊断科,国家恶性肿瘤临床医学研究中心,天津市肿瘤防治重点实验室,天津市恶性肿瘤临床医学研究中心,乳腺癌防治教育部重点实验室,天津 300060

癌症 乳腺癌 保乳手术 影像特征 磁共振成像

国家自然科学基金项目国家自然科学基金项目国家自然科学基金项目天津医科大学肿瘤医院院级课题天津市医学重点学科(专科)建设项目

821720258180178182072004Y1802TJYXZDXK-009A

2024

磁共振成像
中国医院协会 首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院

磁共振成像

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.38
ISSN:1674-8034
年,卷(期):2024.15(1)
  • 40