首页|基于ZOOM-mDixon的T2*/R2*成像术前预测胰腺导管腺癌淋巴结转移的价值

基于ZOOM-mDixon的T2*/R2*成像术前预测胰腺导管腺癌淋巴结转移的价值

扫码查看
目的 探讨ZOOM-mDixon序列衍生的定量T2*/R2*值在术前评价胰腺导管腺癌淋巴结转移的可行性.材料与方法 回顾性分析经病理证实的59例胰腺导管腺癌患者临床及影像资料,其中淋巴结转移(lymphatic metastasis,LNM)31例,非淋巴结转移(non-lymph node metastases,nLNM)28例.术前均行包括ZOOM-mDixon序列的MRI扫描,分析两组的临床基本资料(年龄、术前CA19-9水平等)、常规影像学特征(部位、形态等)和T2*/R2*值.使用组内相关系数(intra-class correlation coefficient,ICC)评价其可重复性,采用U检验、t检验或χ2检验比较两组间各参数的差异,绘制受试者工作特征(receiving operator characteristic,ROC)曲线,利用曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)评价相关指标的诊断性能.结果 T2*/R2*值的组间和组内ICC值均在0.83~0.97之间.两组间的年龄、肿块形态、肿块短径、肿块部位、术前糖类抗原(carbohydrate antigen,CA)19-9、CA125、癌胚抗原(carcinoma embryonic antigen,CEA)水平等差异无统计学意义,而性别、病灶长径和病灶边界差异有统计学意义(P值分别为0.023、0.048、0.040).两组间的T2*值和R2*值差异有统计学意义(P值均<0.05).与nLNM组相比,LNM组的R2*值较小[17.63(15.10,22.50)/s vs.24.00(20.00,28.30)/s];T2*值更高[(63.77±13.95)ms vs.(49.71± 12.67)ms].T2*/R2*值预测胰腺癌淋巴结转移的AUC分别为0.775和0.766.结论 ZOOM-mDixon序列衍生的T2*/R2*成像量化值可术前预测胰腺导管腺癌的淋巴结转移,为临床治疗提供参考.
Value of ZOOM-mDixon-derived T2*/R2*imaging in preoperative predicting lymph node metastasis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
Objective:To investigate the feasibility of using quantitative T2*/R2*values derived from the ZOOM-mDixon sequence for evaluating lymph node metastasis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Materials and Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on 59 patients with pathologically confirmed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma,including 31 patients with lymph node metastasis(LNM)and 28 patients without lymph node metastasis(nLNM).All patients underwent preoperative MRI scans,which included the ZOOM-mDixon sequence.The analysis involved examining clinical data,such as age and preoperative carbohydrate antigen(CA)19-9 levels,routine radiological features including location and morphology,and T2*/R2*values.Intra-class correlation coefficients(ICC)were used to evaluate repeatability,while U-tests,t-tests,or χ2 tests were used to compare differences between the two groups.The receiving operator characteristic(ROC)curve was plotted,and the area under curve(AUC)was calculated to assess the diagnostic performance of quantitative indicators.Results:The inter-and intra-group ICC values for T2*/R2*were excellent,ranging from 0.83 to 0.97.No statistically significant differences were observed in age,tumor morphology,short diameter of the tumor,tumor location,preoperative CA19-9,CA125,carcinoma embryonic antigen(CEA)levels between the LNM and nLNM groups.However,gender,long diameter of the lesion,and lesion boundary exhibited statistically significant differences(P values were 0.023,0.048,0.040,respectively).There were significant statistical differences in the T2*and R2*values between the two groups(P values<0.05).Compared with the nLNM group,the LNM group exhibited a smaller R2*value[17.63(15.10,22.50)/s vs.24.00(20.00,28.30)/s]and a higher T2*value[(63.77±13.95)ms vs.(49.71±12.67)ms].The AUCs for T2*/R2*values in predicting lymph node metastasis of pancreatic cancer were 0.775 and 0.766,respectively.Conclusions:Quantitative T2*/R2*imaging derived from the ZOOM-mDixon sequences can predict preoperative lymph node metastasis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma,offering valuable insights for clinical treatment decisions.

pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomawater-fat separation techniquemagnetic resonance imaginglymph node metastasispreoperativ prediction

刘扶摇、张京刚、陈杰、杜亚楠、李明磊

展开 >

苏州大学附属第三医院放射科,常州 213000

胰腺导管腺癌 水脂分离技术 磁共振成像 淋巴结转移 术前预测

江苏省卫生健康委科研项目

ZD2022003

2024

磁共振成像
中国医院协会 首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院

磁共振成像

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.38
ISSN:1674-8034
年,卷(期):2024.15(1)
  • 42