首页|MR弹性成像与钆塞酸二钠增强T1 mapping定量评估兔肝纤维化的对比研究

MR弹性成像与钆塞酸二钠增强T1 mapping定量评估兔肝纤维化的对比研究

扫码查看
目的评价MR弹性成像(magnetic resonance elastography,MRE)、钆塞酸二钠(gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethyle netriamine pentaacetic acid,Gd-EOB-DTPA)增强T1 mapping在肝纤维化(liver fibrosis,LF)早期定量的价值.材料与方法实验材料为新西兰大白兔(共120只),分为正常对照组(n=20)与肝纤维化组[LF组,50%四氯化碳(carbon tetrachloride,CCL4)油溶液模型,n=100],分别在第4、5、6、15周末取5只对照组与25只LF组兔行MRI肝脏轴位T1WI、MRE及Gd-EOB-DTPA增强T1 mapping扫描,测量肝脏弹性硬度(liver stiffness,LS)、平扫T1弛豫时间(T1native)及Gd-EOB-DTPA增强T1 mapping扫描20 min后T1弛豫时间(T120min),计算T1弛豫时间减少率(ΔT120min)及1/T1弛豫时间增加值(ΔR120min);采用Scheuer评分系统进行LF病理学分期,单因素方差分析对比各定量参数与LF分期间的差异,Spearman相关性分析比较各定量参数与LF病理分期相关性,受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线评估各定量参数对LF分期诊断效能.结果共纳入96只活兔模型,病理学评分:F0期15只、F1期22只、F2期22只、F3期18只、F4期19只.LS、T1native、T120min、ΔT120min、ΔR120min于LF各期间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).LS、T1native、T120min、ΔT120min、ΔR120min均与LF分期相关(r=0.935、0.559、0.770、−0.418、−0.686,P<0.001).F0 vs.F1~F4、F0 vs.F1~F2、F0 vs.F3~F4、F1~F2 vs.F3~F4的LS值ROC曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)分别为0.988、0.979、1.000、0.995,T120min值AUC分别为0.914、0.852、0.987、0.896.结论在评估LF早期诊断中,MRE及Gd-EOB-DTPA增强T1 mapping成像均显示出较好的诊断价值,MRE优于Gd-EOB-DTPA增强T1 mapping.
Quantitative evaluation of liver fibrosis by MRE and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced T1 mapping magnetic resonance imaging in a rabbit model
Objective:To compare the accuracy of MR elastography (MRE) and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced T1 mapping in the quantitative evaluation of liver fibrosis (LF) staging. Materials and Methods:One hundred and twenty rabbits were randomly divided into control group (n=20),which were injected subcutaneously with normal saline solution,and LF group (n=100),which were received 50% (carbon tetrachloride) CCl4 oil solution. The control group (n=5) and LF group (n=25) underwent MRI axial scan,T1WI,MRE,Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced T1 mapping at the end of the 4th,5th,6th,15th week. The pathological LF staging was based on Scheuer staging system. The quantitative parameter included liver stiffness (LS),pre-and post-contrast T1 values of the liver (T1native and T120min),the reduction rate of T1 relaxation time (ΔT120min) and the increase in T1 relaxation rate (ΔR120min),were compared the differences by one-way ANOVA analysis. Spearman correlation coefficients,Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used respectively to determine the correlation and diagnostic performance between quantitative parameters and pathological LF staging. Results:A total of 96 rabbits were included in F0 (n=15),F1 (n=22),F2 (n=22),F3 (n=18) and F4 (n=19). LS,T1native,T120min,ΔT120min,ΔR120min showed significant differences among all LF staging (P<0.05). There were correlation between LS,T1native,T120min,ΔT120min,ΔR120min and LF stage (r=0.935,0.559,0.770,−0.418 −0.686,P<0.001),respectively. LS exhibited the largest area under the curve (AUC),which were 0.988,0.979,1.000,0.995 for F0 vs. F1~F4,F0 vs. F1~F2,F0 vs. F3~F4,F1~F2 vs. F3~F4,respectively. Secondly,the AUC of T120min were 0.914,0.852,0.987,and 0.896,respectively. Conclusions:In the early quantitative evaluation of LF staging,MRE and Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced T1 mapping had demonstrated significant diagnostic value,with MRE outperforming Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced T1 mapping.

liver fibrosismagnetic resonance elastographyliver stiffnessGd-EOB-DTPAT1 mapping

张豪、邹立秋、钟文新、麦晓飞、石桥

展开 >

深圳市南山区人民医院放射科,深圳 518052

深圳市宝安区妇幼保健院放射科,深圳 518100

肝纤维化 磁共振弹性成像 肝脏硬度 钆塞酸二钠 T1 mapping成像

国家自然科学基金面上项目深圳市南山区科技计划

81771805NS2024079

2024

磁共振成像
中国医院协会 首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院

磁共振成像

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.38
ISSN:1674-8034
年,卷(期):2024.15(8)