首页|初探T1 mapping联合DWI识别早期肾间质纤维化的价值

初探T1 mapping联合DWI识别早期肾间质纤维化的价值

扫码查看
目的 探讨纵向弛豫时间定量成像(T1 mapping)联合弥散加权成像(diffusion weighted imaging,DWI)在早期识别肾间质纤维化(interstitial fibrosis,IF)方面的价值.材料与方法 回顾性分析2020年1月至2023年12月在南京医科大学附属无锡人民医院就诊的经肾内科医师评估后接受肾穿刺活检的38例慢性肾脏病(chronic kidney disease,CKD)患者和20例健康志愿者的临床和影像资料.检测所有受试者的血清肌酐(serum creatinine,SCr)并估算肾小球滤过率(estimated glomerular filtration rate,eGFR),同时行T1 mapping和DWI检查,分别测量肾脏皮质T1值(cortex T1,cT1)、髓质T1值(medulla T1,mT1)、皮质表观弥散系数(apparent diffusion coefficient,ADC)值(cADC)和髓质ADC值(mADC).根据肾脏病理的间质损伤程度,将CKD患者分为无IF的CKD-IF0组(7例)和轻度IF的IF1组(31例),健康志愿者为对照组(20例).分别比较对照组、CKD-IF0组、IF1组的肾脏皮髓质T1值和ADC值,分析皮髓质T1值和ADC值与eGFR的相关性,进一步评估eGFR、皮髓质T1值和ADC值诊断肾间质无纤维化和轻度纤维化的效能.结果 (1)对照组和CKD-IF0组的皮髓质T1值和ADC值差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);对照组的皮髓质ADC值均高于IF1组(P<0.05),T1值均低于IF1组(P<0.05);CKD-IF0组的皮髓质ADC值均高于IF1组(P<0.05),cT1低于IF1组(P<0.05),mT1两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).(2)将对照组和CKD-IF0组合并为IF0组后,IF0组的皮髓质T1值低于IF1组(P<0.05),ADC值高于IF1组(P<0.05).(3)所有受试者的cT1与eGFR呈负相关(ρ=-0.476,P<0.05),cADC与eGFR呈正相关(ρ=0.391,P<0.05).mT1 和 mADC 与 eGFR相关性不具有统计学意义(P>0.05).(4)当单独用eGFR、cT1、mT1、cADC、mADC鉴别IF0组和IF1组时,以eGFR效能最高,AUC为0.861[95%置信区间(confidence interval,CI):0.761~0.962],敏感度为80.6%,特异度为88.9%;当联合cT1 和cADC后,鉴别IF0组和IF1组的效能进一步提高,AUC为0.912(95%CI:0.839~0.984),敏感度为83.9%,特异度为85.2%;当联合eGFR、cT1和cADC后,达到最高鉴别效能,AUC为0.963(95%CI:0.922~1.000),敏感度为87.1%,特异度为96.3%.结论 T1 mapping联合DWI可无创有效地鉴别肾脏IF,有望辅助eGFR来进一步提高早期识别肾脏组织结构损伤的能力.
The value of T1 mapping combined with DWI in the early identification of renal interstitial fibrosis
Objective:To explore the value of T1 mapping combined with diffusion-weighted imaging(DWI)in the early identification of renal interstitial fibrosis(IF).Materials and Methods:A total of 38 patients with chronic kidney disease(CKD)and 20 healthy volunteers who received renal needle biopsy after evaluation by nephrologist were collected from January 2020 to December 2023 in Wuxi People's Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University.Serum creatinine(SCr)and estimated glomerular filtration rate(eGFR)were measured in all subjects.T1 mapping and DWI were performed at the same time,and T1 and ADC values of renal cortex and medulla were measured,respectively.According to the degree of interstitial damage in renal pathology,CKD patients were divided into CKD-IF0 group(7 cases)without interstitial fibrosis and IF1 group(31 cases)with mild interstitial fibrosis.Healthy volunteers were divided into control group(20 cases).Renal medullary T1 and ADC values in control group,CKD-IF0 group and IF1 group were compared.We analyzed the correlation between cutis medulla T1 and ADC values and eGFR,and further evaluated the efficacy of eGFR,cutis medulla T1 and ADC values in the diagnosis of renal interstitial fibrosis without and with mild fibrosis.Results:(1)There were no significant differences in T1 and ADC values between control group and CKD-IF0 group(P>0.05).ADC values of cortex and medulla in control group were higher than those of IF1 group(P<0.05),and T1 values of control group were lower than those of IF1 group(P<0.05).The ADC values of cortex and medulla in CKD-IF0 group were higher than those in IF1 group(P<0.05),cT1 was lower than that in IF1 group(P<0.05),and there was no significant difference in mT1 between the two groups(P>0.05).(2)After the control group and CKD-IF0 were combined into IF0 group,the cortex and medulla T1 value of IF0 group was significantly lower than that of IF1 group(P<0.05),and the ADC value was significantly higher than that of IF1 group(P<0.05).(3)cT1 was negatively correlated with eGFR(ρ=-0.476,P<0.05),and cADC was positively correlated with eGFR(ρ=0.391,P<0.05).There was no significant correlation between mT1 and mADC and eGFR(P>0.05).(4)When eGFR,cT1,mT1,cADC and mADC were used separately to distinguish IF0 group and IF1 group,eGFR had the highest efficiency,with AUC of 0.861[95%confidence interval(CI):0.761-0.962],sensitivity of 80.6%,and specificity of 88.9%.When cT1 and cADC were combined,the efficiency of differentiation between IF0 group and IF1 group was further improved,with AUC of 0.912(95%CI:0.839-0.984),sensitivity of 83.9%,and specificity of 85.2%.When combined with eGFR,cT1 and cADC,the highest differential efficacy was achieved,with AUC of 0.963(95%CI:0.922-1.000),sensitivity of 87.1%and specificity of 96.3%.Conclusions:T1 mapping combined with DWI can noninvasculatively and effectively identify renal interstitial fibrosis,and is expected to assist eGFR to further improve the ability of early identification of renal tissue and structure damage.

chronic kidney diseaserenal interstitial fibrosismagnetic resonance imagingT1 mappingdiffusion weighted imagingearly identification

孔欣悦、华晨辰、周乐汀、庄毅、刘晓斌、蔡婷、王凉

展开 >

南京医科大学附属无锡人民医院肾内科,无锡 214023

南京医科大学附属无锡人民医院影像科,无锡 214023

江南大学附属无锡儿童医院影像科,无锡 214023

慢性肾脏病 肾间质纤维化 磁共振成像 纵向弛豫时间定量成像 弥散加权成像 早期识别

2024

磁共振成像
中国医院协会 首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院

磁共振成像

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.38
ISSN:1674-8034
年,卷(期):2024.15(11)