首页|膝关节镜缝线Nice结固定和交叉克氏针固定治疗胫骨髁间棘撕脱骨折的疗效研究

膝关节镜缝线Nice结固定和交叉克氏针固定治疗胫骨髁间棘撕脱骨折的疗效研究

扫码查看
目的 比较膝关节镜缝线Nice结固定和交叉克氏针固定治疗胫骨髁间棘撕脱骨折的疗效。方法 选取2021年3月至2023年10月潢川县人民医院收治的75例胫骨髁间棘撕脱骨折患者为研究对象,根据随机数字表法分为对照组(38例)和试验组(37例)。对照组予以膝关节镜交叉克氏针固定治疗,试验组予以膝关节镜缝线Nice结固定治疗,两组术后均随访6个月。比较两组手术时间、术后完全负重行走时间、骨折愈合时间、出血量等手术及恢复相关指标;两组伸膝功能、屈膝功能(随访6个月后);分别采用Lysholm膝关节评分和视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估两组患者膝关节功能和疼痛程度(术前和随访3、6个月后),比较两组随访6个月内并发症发生情况。结果 试验组较对照组术后完全负重行走时间、手术时间、骨折愈合时间更短,出血量更少(P<0。05)。随访6个月后,试验组伸膝功能、屈膝功能正常的患者占比高于对照组,伸膝功能、屈膝功能轻度异常的患者占比低于对照组(P<0。05)。随访3~6个月后,两组Lysholm膝关节评分均高于术前,且试验组评分高于对照组(P<0。05);两组VAS评分均低于术前,且试验组评分低于对照组(P<0。05)。随访6个月内,两组并发症总发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。结论 相较于膝关节镜交叉克氏针固定,膝关节镜缝线Nice结固定能够提高胫骨髁间棘撕脱骨折患者的伸膝、屈膝功能及膝关节功能,缓解患者疼痛情况,改善其手术相关指标,可促进患者恢复且安全性较好。
A Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Nice Knot and Crossed Kirschner Wire Fixation in Knee Arthroscopy Suture for Avulsion Fracture of Tibial Intercondylar Spine
Objective To compare the curative effect of Nice knot fixation and crossed Kirschner wire fixation in knee arthroscopy suture for avulsion fracture of tibial intercondylar spine.Methods A total of 75 patients with avulsion fracture of tibial intercondylar spine in Huangchuan County People's Hospital from March 2021 to October 2023 were selected as the research objects.They were divided into the control group(n=38)and the experimental group(n=37)according to random number table method.During knee arthroscopy suture treatment,the control group was given crossed Kirschner wire fixation while the experimental group was given Nice knot fixation.Both groups were followed up for 6 months after operation.The indexes related to operation and recovery,such as duration of operation,time to full weight-bearing walking,fracture healing time,and intraoperative blood loss were compared between the two groups.Functions such as knee extension and knee flexion(at the 6-month follow-up)were compared between the two groups.Before operation,at the 3-month and 6-month follow-up,Lysholm Knee Score(LKS)and Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)were applied to evaluate the knee function and pain level in both groups,respectively.Incidence of complications within the 6 months of follow-up were compared between the two groups.Results Compared with the control group,the experimental group exhibited shorter time to full weight-bearing walking,duration of operation and fracture healing time,and less intraoperative blood loss(P<0.05).At the 6-month follow-up,compared with the control group,the experimental group showed higher proportion of patients with normal knee extension and flexion functions,and lower proportion of patients with mild abnormal knee extension and flexion functions(P<0.05).At the 3-month and 6-month follow-up,the scores of LKS in both groups were higher than those before operation,and the LKS scores in the experimental group were higher than those in the control group(P<0.05),while the scores of VAS in both groups were lower than those before operation,and the VAS scores in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group(P<0.05).Within the 6 months of follow-up,there was no significant difference in the total incidence of complications between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion In knee arthroscopy suture for patients with avulsion fracture of tibial intercondylar spine,compared with crossed Kirschner wire fixation,Nice knot fixation shows better efficacy in improving the knee extension and flexion functions and knee joint function,relieving the pain,improving the operation related indexes,and promote the recovery of patients with equal safety.

Avulsion fracture of tibial intercondylar spineKnee arthroscopySuture Nice knot fixationCrossed Kirschner wireClinical efficacy

徐真玉、路坦

展开 >

新乡医学院第一附属医院骨科(新乡 453100)

潢川县人民医院骨科(信阳 465150)

新乡医学院第一附属医院骨科医院·新乡市骨关节退行性疾病研究重点实验室(新乡 453100)

胫骨髁间棘撕脱骨折 膝关节镜 缝线Nice结固定 交叉克氏针 临床疗效

2025

成都医学院学报
成都医学院

成都医学院学报

影响因子:0.933
ISSN:1674-2257
年,卷(期):2025.20(1)