首页|CYGNSS 3种地表反射率在贵州山区的土壤湿度反演对比

CYGNSS 3种地表反射率在贵州山区的土壤湿度反演对比

扫码查看
针对气旋全球导航卫星系统(CYGNSS)3种常用地表反射率在土壤湿度(SM)反演方面性能尚不明晰的问题,该文以贵州省为研究区,以LightGBM为建模工具,通过实验对比分析了其各自的SM反演精度.结果表明:以CYGNSS 3种地表反射率为解释变量的SM模型均能获得较高的建模精度和SM反演精度;基于信噪比(SNR)反射率的SM模型更易受植被覆盖的影响,模型泛化能力最差,SM反演结果的精度最低;基于峰值功率反射率的SM模型具有更强的泛化能力,获得了更高的SM反演精度,SM反演结果的均方根误差、平均绝对误差和皮尔逊相关系数分别为0.053 6、0.042 3 cm3·cm-3和0.767 0.研究结论可为CYGNSS 土壤湿度反演观测值的选取提供参考.
Comparison of soil moisture inversion of three types of CYGNSS Land reflectivity in Guizhou
Considering the unclear performance of the three commonly used Cyclones Global Navigation Satellite System(CYGNSS)surface reflectivity in the soil moisture(SM)retrieval,this paper takes Guizhou Province as the study area and uses LightGBM as the modeling tool to experimentally compare and analyze their respective SM inversion accuracy.The results indicate that the SM models,which incorporate three types of CYGNSS surface reflectivity as explanatory variables,achieved higher modeling accuracy and SM inversion accuracy.However,the SM model based on signal-to-noise ratio(SNR)reflectivity was more susceptible to vegetation cover,resulting in poorer generalization ability and lower accuracy in SM inversion results.The SM model,based on peak power reflectivity,exhibited stronger generalization ability and higher accuracy in SM inversion.The root mean square error,mean absolute error,and Pearson correlation coefficient for the SM inversion results were 0.053 6,0.042 3 cm3·cm-3,and 0.767 0 respectively.The research findings can provide reference for the selection of CYGNSS observations in soil moisture inversion.

CYGNSSGNSS-Rsoil moistureland reflectivityvegetation coverLightGBM

刘晶晖、张显云、雷楷烨、邓小东、龙安成

展开 >

贵州大学矿业学院,贵阳 550025

浙江大学资源与环境学院,杭州 310058

CYGNSS GNSS-R 土壤湿度 地表反射率 植被覆盖 LightGBM

贵州省省级科技计划项目贵州省省级科技计划项目

黔科合支撑[2022]一般204黔科合基础-ZK[2024]一般093

2024

测绘科学
中国测绘科学研究院

测绘科学

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:0.774
ISSN:1009-2307
年,卷(期):2024.49(5)
  • 13