首页|外资并购效应:价值俘获还是价值创造?

外资并购效应:价值俘获还是价值创造?

扫码查看
外资并购是我国新发展格局下参与外循环的重要形式之一,畅通外资参与国内价值创造的渠道也是我国经济高质量发展的重要课题。相对于内资企业,外资并购的子公司往往具有更大的产值、更高的生产率,从而形成更大的市场价值。然而,这种"溢价"到底源自外资并购前的"价值俘获",还是并购后带来的"价值创造"呢?文章采用"粗化精确匹配(CEM)"和"逆概率加权匹配(IPW)"方法剔除并购前"价值俘获"带来的自选择效应,结果发现:(1)并购时存在"价值俘获"的行为,采用CEM和IPW方法剔除样本自选择效应后,并购仍然带来显著的"生产率提升效应"和"规模扩张效应",但以上两种效应均存在一定程度的滞后性;(2)其价值创造的机制在于,外资并购显著缓解了融资约束,提升了自主研发的概率,进而带来绩效的显著改善;(3)然而,"国外市场获取机制"并不显著,"技术进口机制"仅在进口中间品方面成立,通过进口先进机器设备直接获取技术外溢的渠道仍不畅通。文章有助于厘清外资并购对企业价值创造的具体影响机制,为更好地发挥跨国公司的技术外溢效应提供了政策参考。
The Effect of Foreign Capital Mergers and Acquisitions:Value Capture or Value Creation?
Foreign capital mergers and acquisitions (M&As) are a common phenomenon in internation-al economic activities, and the outstanding performance of the acquired companies can arise from both pre-ac-quisition "value capture" behavior and post-acquisition "value creation" effect. Both host-country enter-prises and governments aim to achieve the "value creation" effect through foreign investment. Therefore, evaluating the causal effect between foreign capital M&As and corporate performance, as well as clarifying the channel through which the "value creation" effect is obtained, becomes particularly important. Subsidiar-ies resulting from foreign capital M&As often exhibit higher output and productivity compared to domestic en-terprises, leading to greater market value. However, it raises the question whether this outcome is attributable to "value capture" prior to foreign capital M&As or to "value creation" after the M&As have taken place. This paper attempts to provide an explanation for the question.The results reveal that: (1) "Value capture" behavior exists during the M&A process. After eliminating the sample self-selection effect using the CEM and IPW methods, it is observed that foreign capital M&As continue to yield a remarkable "productivity improvement effect" and "scale expansion effect", but both ef-fects display a certain degree of time lag. (2) The mechanism of the "value creation" effect lies in that, for-eign capital M&As significantly alleviate financing constraints, increase the likelihood of independent R&D, and thus bring significant improvement in performance. (3) The "foreign market access mechanism" is not significant, the "technology import mechanism" only applies to intermediate goods imports, and the channel for direct technology spillover through the importation of advanced machinery and equipment remains restricted.The academic value of this paper is mainly reflected in that: First, it clarifies the specific mechanism through which foreign capital M&As affect "value creation". Foreign capital M&As enable enterprises to leverage the financial resources of foreign parent companies, effectively alleviating their financing constraints. This, to a certain extent, supports the investment in R&D, and significantly enhances the likelihood of inde-pendent R&D following foreign capital M&As. Second, it provides policy references for harnessing the tech-nological spillover effect of multinational corporations. The traditional mechanism of foreign market access and importation of capital goods through foreign capital M&As are not established. Foreign capital M&As can bring about "value creation", but may also have a certain negative effect. Third, it clarifies that the perform-ance improvement resulting from foreign capital M&As is a joint outcome of both "value creation" and"value capture".

foreign capital M&Asvalue creationproductivity improvementscale expansion

李逸飞、梁婷、楚尔鸣

展开 >

管理世界杂志社,北京 100026

广州大学经济与统计学院,广东广州 510006

湘潭大学商学院,湖南湘潭 411105

外资并购 价值创造 生产率提升 规模扩张

国家社会科学基金重点项目国家自然科学基金面上项目

23AJL01171973117

2024

财经研究
上海财经大学

财经研究

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:3.539
ISSN:1001-9952
年,卷(期):2024.50(5)
  • 4