首页|地方政府债务治理的收入效应

地方政府债务治理的收入效应

扫码查看
文章基于2015年地方政府相继实施的债务管理体制改革构建具有时序错列特征的准自然实验,采用双重差分法识别了地方政府债务治理的收入效应.研究发现,地方政府债务治理能够显著促进企业劳动收入份额的增加,呈现出明显的正向收入效应,且缓解企业融资约束、加剧市场竞争以及提高人力资本是诠释该效应的核心作用机制.横截面检验结果表明,地方政府债务治理的收入效应在融资依赖度较高、融资缺口较大、财政压力较小以及债务期限结构较长的样本中尤为显著.特别地,地方政府债务治理不仅能够降低企业过度负债、抑制税收规避、提高企业的相对雇佣密度和风险承担能力,而且对于企业所在地区的创新创业活动具有显著的积极带动效果.因此,地方政府债务治理不仅能够抑制经济金融风险的演化,而且有助于提高企业劳动收入份额以促进共同富裕,这对于实现"防风险"和"稳增长"双重目标并助推实体经济的高质量发展都具有重要的理论价值和实践意义.
The Income Effect of Local Government Debt Governance
In the current context,Chinese enterprises are confronting unprecedented uncertainty in their production and operations,which negatively impacts labor income shares and spreads through a domino effect on the economy and financial system,exacerbating systemic financial risks. Therefore,how to effectively re-spond to the decline in labor income shares while preventing and resolving local government debt risks has be-come a key link in promoting high-quality development of the real economy. In fact,China has implemented a series of measures to tackle local government debt risks and improve the distribution pattern of national in-come. One notable initiative is the reform of local government debt management launched in 2015,which fun-damentally constrains the debt financing mode for local governments.Taking the debt management system reform implemented by local governments across China in 2015 as an exogenous shock,this paper uses the DID model to identify the income effect of local government debt governance. The study shows that local government debt governance can bring a significant positive income effect,and alleviating financing constraints,intensifying market competition,and improving human capital are the core mechanisms of this effect. Furthermore,this paper finds that the positive income effect of local gov-ernment debt governance exhibits significant structural differences in samples with different attributes. In addi-tion,local government debt governance can not only reduce excessive debt,curb tax evasion,increase relative employment density,and enhance their risk-taking ability,but also help promote innovation and entrepreneur-ship activities in the regions where enterprises are located.The marginal contributions of this paper are as follows:First,it confirms the income effect of local gov-ernment debt governance,fully reflecting the role of local government debt governance in achieving the goals of "risk prevention" and "stable growth",which is crucial for establishing a long-term mechanism of local government debt governance,improving income distribution structures,and promoting the high-quality devel-opment of the real economy. Second,based on the framework of "government-bank-enterprise",it explains the underlying mechanism of the income effect of local government debt governance,providing theoretical foundations and practical insights on enhancing labor income shares and promote common prosperity. Third,it has important theoretical and practical value for optimizing the government financing structure and alleviating the competitive pressure of financing between the government and enterprises.

government debt governanceincome effectfinancing constraintsmarket competitionhuman capital

李小林、司登奎

展开 >

中国海洋大学经济学院,山东青岛 266100

青岛大学经济学院,山东青岛 266061

政府债务治理 收入效应 融资约束 市场竞争 人力资本

国家社会科学基金一般项目

22BJL018

2024

财经研究
上海财经大学

财经研究

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:3.539
ISSN:1001-9952
年,卷(期):2024.50(7)