首页|吉林省智慧工地建设的风险评价研究

吉林省智慧工地建设的风险评价研究

扫码查看
为防范与化解智慧工地建设存在的各种风险,避免酿成巨大损失,造成严重后果,推动吉林省智慧工地风险评价工作的专业化及标准化发展势在必行.归纳总结了 6 个一级指标与 22 个二级指标,建立了智慧工地建设风险评价指标体系.在权重计算的过程中引入三角模糊数,将改进层次分析法和反熵权法组合赋权,创建基于改进GRA-TOPSIS法的评价模型.运用此模型对三个实际项目进行评价,根据求得的相对接近度确定项目及指标的风险等级和排序,并对比传统TOPSIS法和熵权TOPSIS法的运算结果.最终通过雷达图分析项目潜在的风险程度与风险控制的薄弱环节.研究证明,改进GRA-TOPSIS法适用于风险评价,能准确有效地评价智慧工地建设的风险.
Research on Risk Assessment of Smart Construction Site Development in Jilin Province
To prevent and mitigate various risks associated with the development of smart construction sites,avoid significant losses and severe consequences,it is imperative to promote the professional and standardized development of risk assessment for smart construction sites in Jilin Province.This paper summarizes six first-level indicators and 22 second-level indicators to establish a risk assessment indicator system for smart construction site development.In the process of weight calculation,triangular fuzzy numbers are introduced,and the Improved Analytic Hierarchy Process(IAHP)and Anti-Entropy Weight Method are combined to assign weights,creating an evaluation model based on the Improved GRA-TOPSIS method.This model is applied to evaluate three actual projects,determining the risk levels and rankings of projects and indicators based on the calculated relative closeness,and comparing the results with those of the traditional TOPSIS method and Entropy Weight TOPSIS method.Finally,a radar chart is used to analyze the potential risk level and weak links in risk control of the projects.The research proves that the Improved GRA-TOPSIS method is suitable for risk assessment and can accurately and effectively evaluate the risks associated with the development of smart construction sites.

Smart Construction SiteRisk AssessmentIAHP MethodAnti-Entropy Weight MethodGRA-TOPSIS Method

姜浩、谭晨曦

展开 >

吉林建筑大学经济与管理学院,吉林长春 130118

智慧工地 风险评价 IAHP法 反熵权法 GRA-TOPSIS法

2024

重庆建筑
重庆市建筑科学研究院

重庆建筑

影响因子:0.292
ISSN:1671-9107
年,卷(期):2024.23(10)