首页|经潮气量挑战后的PPV和SVV对ARDS患者容量反应性的预测价值

经潮气量挑战后的PPV和SVV对ARDS患者容量反应性的预测价值

扫码查看
目的 探讨潮气量从6 mL/kg增加到8 mL/kg预测体重(PBW)后的脉压变异度(PPV)和每搏输出量变异度(SVV)及其变化值对急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者容量反应性的预测价值。方法 前瞻性研究,选择2021年1月至2022年12月收入该院重症监护室(ICU)的23例存在急性循环衰竭的ARDS患者,在潮气量6 mL/kg PBW、经潮气量挑战(潮气量瞬间增至8 mL/kg PBW)后1 min、潮气量再降至6 mL/kg PBW及给予容量负荷试验(FB)后分别记录PPV、SVV和心脏指数等指标。以潮气量再降至6 mL/kg PBW并给予FB后心脏指数增加(ΔCI)≥15%为容量反应性阳性。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估潮气量从6 mL/kg增加到8 mL/kg PBW后的PPV和SVV及其变化值对容量反应性的预测价值。结果 23例患者共进行42次测量,其中24组测量结果为容量反应性阳性(R组),18组测量结果为容量反应性阴性(NR组)。潮气量从6 mL/kg增加到8 mL/kg PBW 时PPV、SVV变化绝对值(ΔPPV6-8、ΔSVV6-8)及百分比(%ΔPPV6-8、%ΔSVV6-8)在两组间比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0。05)。ΔPPV6-8、ΔSVV6_8能预测ARDS患者的容量反应性,ROC曲线下面积(AUC)及其95%CI分别为0。92(0。84~1。00)和0。90(0。81~0。99),最佳截断值分别为2。5%和3。5%;潮气量为6 mL/kg PBW时的PPV、SVV、中心静脉压(CVP)不能有效预测ARDS患者的容量反应性。结论 经潮气量挑战后的PPV或SVV变化值预测ARDS患者小潮气量通气时的容量反应性效能优于PPV和SVV。
The predictive value of PPV and SVV after tidal volume challengeon volumetric responsiveness in patients with ARDS
Objective To explore the predictive value of pulse pressure variation(PPV),stroke volume variation(SVV)and their changing values after tidal volume increase from 6 mL/kg to 8 mL/kg predicted body weight(PBW)on the volumetric responsiveness in the patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS).Methods A prospective study was conducted.Twenty-three ARDS patients with acute circulatory failure treated in the intensive care unit(ICU)of this hospital from January 2021 to December 2022 were se-lected.The indicators such as PPV,SVV and cardiac index were recorded at the tidal volume of 6 mL/kg PBW,1 min after tidal volume challenge(tidal volume instantly increased to 8 mL/kg PBW),the tidal volume re-reduced to 6 mL/kg PBW,and after fluid bolus(FB),respectively.The cardiac index increase(ΔCI)≥15%served as the volumetric responsiveness positive when the tidal volume was re-reduced to 6 mL/kg PBW and after giving FB.The receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve was used to evaluate the predictive value of PPV,SVV and their changing values for the volumetric responsiveness after the tidal volume increase from 6 mL/kg to 8 mL/kg PBW.Results A total of 42 measurements were performed in 23 patients.Among them,24 set of measurements were volumetric responsiveness positive(group R),and 18 set of measurements were volumetric responsiveness negative(group NR).The absolute values(ΔPPV6-8,ΔSVV6-8)and percentage(%ΔPPV6-8,%ΔSVV6-8)of PPV and SVV in tidal volume increase from 6 mL/kg to 8 mL/kg PBW had statisti-cal differences between the two groups(P<0.05).ΔPPV6-8 and ΔSVV6-8 could predict the volumetric respon-siveness in the patients with ARDS.The area under the ROC curve(AUC)and its 95%CI were 0.92(0.84-1.00)and 0.90(0.81-0.99),and the optimal cut off values were 2.5%and 3.5%,respectively.When the tid-al volume was 6 mL/kg PBW,the PPV,SVV and central venous pressure(CVP)could not effectively predict the volumetric responsiveness in the patients with ARDS.Conclusion The efficiency of PPV or SVV changing values after tidal volume challenge for predicting the volumetric responsiveness of ARDS patients during low tidal volume ventilation is superior to PPV and SVV.

acute respiratory distress syndromestroke volume variationpulse pressure variationtidal volume challenge

余娜、杨锦平、刘亚林、李灿

展开 >

重庆市第五人民医院重症医学科,重庆 400062

急性呼吸窘迫综合征 每搏输出量变异度 脉压变异度 潮气量挑战

重庆市南岸区科卫联合基金项目

2019-06

2024

重庆医学
重庆市卫生信息中心,重庆市医学会

重庆医学

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.797
ISSN:1671-8348
年,卷(期):2024.53(2)
  • 21