首页|不同磁刺激盆底模式对围绝经期盆底肌筋膜疼痛综合征的治疗效果研究

不同磁刺激盆底模式对围绝经期盆底肌筋膜疼痛综合征的治疗效果研究

扫码查看
目的 研究不同磁刺激盆底模式治疗围绝经期盆底肌筋膜疼痛综合征(MPSS)的临床效果。方法 选取2022年5月至2023年5月该院临床诊断为MPSS的围绝经期女性60例作为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为A、B、C组,每组20例。3组患者均给予盆底肌筋膜手法松解治疗;A组给予盆底磁刺激治疗(10 Hz和50 Hz交替);B组给予骶神经根磁刺激治疗(50 Hz);C组同时给予盆底磁刺激联合骶神经根磁刺激治疗。3组每周治疗2次,连续治疗8周。分别于治疗前后采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估盆底肌筋膜压痛程度,Glazer盆底表面肌电评估盆底肌肉功能。结果 与治疗前比较,3组治疗后主观疼痛VAS评分、盆底肌筋膜压痛VAS评分均有降低,差异均有统计学意义(P<0。05);治疗后与A、B组比较,C组主观疼痛VAS评分、盆底肌筋膜压痛VAS评分明显降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。与治疗前比较,3组治疗后前静息电位、后静息电位的平均波幅及变异系数(CV)均降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05);与治疗前比较,仅C组快速收缩最大波幅,10 s持续收缩、60 s持久收缩的平均波幅及CV均有改善,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05);与A、B组比较,C组治疗后前静息电位、后静息电位的平均波幅及变异系数(CV)均降低,快速收缩最大波幅和10 s持续收缩、60 s持久收缩的平均波幅及CV均有改善,差异均有统计学意义(P<0。05)。结论 盆底磁刺激和骶神经根磁刺激治疗围绝经期MPSS均可有效缓解疼痛,改善盆底肌力,两者联合应用的效果最好。
Study on the therapeutic effect of different magnetic stimulation pelvic floor modes on perimenopausal myofascial pelvic pain syndrome
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of different magnetic stimulation pelvic floor modes in the treatment of perimenopausal myofascial pelvic pain syndrome(MPSS).Methods A total of 60 perimenopausal women who were clinically diagnosed with MPSS in the hospital from May 2022 to May 2023 were selected as the research objects.They were divided into groups A,B and C by random number table method,with 20 cases in each group.All patients in the three groups were treated with pelvic floor myofascial manual release.Group A was given pelvic floor magnetic stimulation(alternating 10 Hz and 50 Hz),group B was given sacral nerve root magnetic stimulation(50 Hz),and group C was given pelvic floor magnetic stimu-lation combined with sacral nerve root magnetic stimulation at the same time.The three groups were treated twice a week for eight weeks.Visual analogue scale(VAS)was used to evaluate the degree of pelvic floor myofascial tenderness before and after treatment,and Glazer pelvic floor surface electromyography was used to evaluate pelvic floor muscle function.Results Compared with before treatment,the VAS scores of subjec-tive pain and pelvic floor myofascial tenderness in the three groups were decreased after treatment,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Compared with group A and group B,the VAS score of subjective pain and the VAS score of pelvic floor myofascial tenderness in group C were significantly decreased after treatment,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Compared with before treatment,the average amplitude and coefficient of variation(CV)of pre-rest potential and post-rest potential in the three groups were decreased after treatment,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Compared with before treatment,only the maximum amplitude of rapid contraction,the average amplitude of 10 s sustained contraction and 60 s sustained contraction and CV in group C were improved,and the differ-ences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Compared with group A and group B,the average amplitude and CV of pre-resting potential and post-resting potential in group C were decreased after treatment,the maxi-mum amplitude of rapid contraction and the average amplitude and CV of 10 s continuous contraction and 60 s persistent contraction were improved,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Dif-ferent magnetic stimulation pelvic floor modes can effectively relieve pain and improve pelvic floor muscle strength in the treatment of perimenopausal MPSS,and the effect of pelvic floor magnetic stimulation com-bined with sacral nerve root magnetic stimulation is the best.

pelvic floor magnetic stimulationmagnetic stimulation of sacral nerve rootperimenopa-usewomenpelvic floor myofascial pain syndrome

汪玲玲、黄惠萍、陈鸣华、李嫜洁、马芮、许晶

展开 >

无锡市妇幼保健院康复医学科,江苏无锡 214000

盆底磁刺激 骶神经根磁刺激 围绝经期 女性 盆底肌筋膜疼痛综合征

江苏省卫生健康委员会第三周期省妇幼健康重点学科-妇女保健项目

SFY3-FB2021

2024

重庆医学
重庆市卫生信息中心,重庆市医学会

重庆医学

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.797
ISSN:1671-8348
年,卷(期):2024.53(5)
  • 25