首页|驱动压指导PEEP滴定用于术中机械通气的meta分析

驱动压指导PEEP滴定用于术中机械通气的meta分析

扫码查看
目的 系统评价驱动压指导固定呼气末正压(PEEP)滴定用于术中机械通气的有效性与安全性。方法 计算机检索PubMed、Web of Science、the Cochrane Library、Embase、中国知网(CNKI)、万方和维普数据库,检索驱动压指导PEEP滴定用于术中机械通气的随机对照研究(RCT),检索时间为建库至2023年11月8日。由2名研究者独立筛选文献、提取资料并评价纳入研究的偏倚风险后,采用RevMan 5。4软件进行meta分析。结果 共纳入19篇文献,共计患者2 906例,研究组采用驱动压指导PEEP滴定的肺保护通气策略,共计患者1 440例,对照组采用传统肺保护通气策略,共计患者1 466例。与对照组比较,研究组在非胸科手术中术后肺部并发症(PPCs)发生率更低(RR=0。53,95%CI:0。43~0。65,P<0。001),而在胸科手术中差异无统计学意义(RR=0。89,95%CI:0。78~1。02,P=0。09)。与对照组比较,研究组术中肺顺应性升高(MD=6。90 L/cmH2O,95%CI:5。80~7。99,P<0。001),住院时间缩短(MD=-0。27 d,95%CI:-0。43~-0。12,P<0。001),而术中平均动脉压(MAP)差异无统计学意义(MD=0。36 mmHg,95%CI:-1。30~2。01,P=0。67)。结论 与传统肺保护通气比较,驱动压指导PEEP滴定通气能够提高患者术中肺顺应性,降低非胸科手术PPCs发生率,缩短住院时间,且不增加血流动力学紊乱的风险。
Driving pressure-guided PEEP titration for intraoperative mechanical ventilation:a meta-analysis
Objective To systematic evaluate the effectiveness and safety of driving pressure-guided fixed positive end-expiratory pressure(PEEP)titration in intraoperative mechanical ventilation.Methods PubMed,Web of Science,the Cochrane Library,Embase,CNKI,Wanfang and VIP databases were searched for collect randomized controlled trials(RCTs)of PEEP titration guided by driving pressure in intraoperative mechanical ventilation from inception to November 8,2023.After two researchers independently screened the literature,extracted data,and evaluated the risk of bias of the included studies,the meta-analysis was conducted by Rev-Man 5.4 software.Results Nineteen studies with a total of 2 906 patients were included.There were 1 440 patients in the study group with the lung protective ventilation strategy guided by PEEP titration,and 1 466 patients in the control group with the traditional lung protective ventilation strategy.Compared with the con-trol group,the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications(PPCs)in the study group was lower in the non-thoracic surgery(RR=0.53,95%CI:0.43-0.65,P<0.001),but there was no statistical difference in the incidence of PPCS in the thoracic surgery(RR=0.89,95%CI:0.78-1.02,P=0.09).Compared with the control group,the intraoperative lung compliance was increased(MD= 6.90 L/cmH2O,95%CI:5.80-7.99,P<0.001),and the length of hospital stay was shortened in the study group(MD=-0.27 d,95%CI:-0.43 to-0.12,P<0.001),while there was no significant difference in intraoperative mean arterial pres-sure(MAP)between the two groups(MD=0.36 mmHg,95%CI:-1.30 to 2.01,P=0.67).Conclusion Com-pared with the traditional lung protective ventilation,driving pressure-guided PEEP titration ventilation can im-prove intraoperative lung compliance,reduce the incidence of PPCs in non-thoracic surgery,shorten the length of hospital stay,and does not increase the risk of hemodynamic disturbances in patients undergoing surgery.

driving pressurelung protective ventilationpostoperative pulmonary complicationsmeta-analysis

周建雄、刘春雨、魏闯

展开 >

重庆大学附属肿瘤医院麻醉科,重庆 400030

驱动压 肺保护性通气 术后肺部并发症 meta分析

中央引导地方科技发展专项

渝财规20165号

2024

重庆医学
重庆市卫生信息中心,重庆市医学会

重庆医学

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.797
ISSN:1671-8348
年,卷(期):2024.53(5)
  • 26