首页|Fried衰弱表型和Tilburg衰弱指数对社区老年人生活质量的评估研究

Fried衰弱表型和Tilburg衰弱指数对社区老年人生活质量的评估研究

扫码查看
目的 对比Fried衰弱表型(FP)和Tilburg衰弱指数(TFI)两种衰弱评估量表对社区老年人生活质量的预测价值,为基层全科医生选择合适的社区老年人生活质量筛查工具提供参考。方法 使用便利抽样法,选取638名社区老年人为研究对象。采用FP和TFI两种衰弱评估量表进行衰弱评估,以简明健康调查问卷(SF-12)评估生活质量。使用Kappa值评价FP和TFI两种衰弱评估量表的一致性,Pearson相关性分析分别检测两种衰弱评估量表与SF-12的相关性,使用Bayes判别分析评价两种衰弱评估量表对生活质量的预测能力。结果 638名社区老年人中,FP筛查出的衰弱发生率为15。4%,TFI筛查的衰弱发生率为28。2%,FP与TFI一致性检验Kappa值为0。569(P<0。001)。相关性分析结果显示,FP、TFI与SF-12的躯体健康总评分(PCS)、心理健康总评分(MCS)均呈负相关(FP与PCS、MCS的r=-0。772、-0。349,P<0。01,TFI与PCS、MCS的r=-0。738、-0。491,P<0。01)。以生活质量为标准,FP和TFI对PCS下降预测的交叉验证准确率分别为76。65%、71。63%,对MCS下降预测的交叉验证准确率分别为72。10%、75。55%。结论 FP与TFI对社区老年人生活质量下降均有预测价值,但TFI具有多维度和应用简单的特点,对社区老年人生活质量的评估更有效、更实用。
Study on Fried frailty phenotype and Tilburg frailty index for evaluating quality of life in community elderly people
Objective To compare the predictive value of Fried frailty phenotype (FP) and Tilburg frailty Index (TFI) to the quality of life in community elderly people so as to provide a reference for the grass-roots general practitioners to choose the appropriate quality of life screening tool in the community elderly people.Methods Using the convenient sampling method,638 elderly people in the community were selected as the research subjects.FP and TFI were used to assess frailty,and the quality of life was evaluated by the brief health questionnaire (SF-12).The Kappa value was used to evaluate the consistency of the two scales. The Pearson correlation was used to detect the correlation between the two scales and SF-12 respectively,and the Bayes discriminant analysis was used to evaluate and analyze the predictive ability of the two scales on the quality of life.Results Among the 638 community elderly people,the screened incidence rate of frailty was 15.4% by FP and 28.2% by TFI,the Kappa value of FP and TFI consistence test was 0.569 (P<0.001). The results of correlation analysis showed that FP and TFI were negatively correlated with the total physical health score (PCS) and total mental health score (MCS) of SF-12 (FP with PCS and MCS,r=-0.772,-0.349,P<0.01;TFI with PCS and MCS,r=-0.738,-0.491,P<0.01).Taking the quality of life as the criterion,the cross-validation accuracy rates of FP and TFI for predicting the PCS decline were 76.65% and 71.63% respectively,which for MCS decline was 72.10% and 75.55% respectively.Conclusion Both FP and TFI all have the predictive value on the decline of quality of life of the community elderly people,but TFI has the characteristics of multi-dimensions and easy application,so it is more effective and practical for evaluating the quality of life in the community elderly people.

quality of lifefrailtyfrailty assessment toolsimmunity elderly people

王怡、王静宇、邓辉胜

展开 >

重庆医科大学附属第一医院全科医学科,重庆 400016

生活质量 衰弱 衰弱评估工具 社区老年人

重庆市科卫联合医学科研项目

2020ZLXM003

2024

重庆医学
重庆市卫生信息中心,重庆市医学会

重庆医学

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.797
ISSN:1671-8348
年,卷(期):2024.53(8)
  • 24