首页|CRD联合肠道微生态制剂对超重/肥胖不孕患者新鲜周期胚胎移植妊娠结局的影响

CRD联合肠道微生态制剂对超重/肥胖不孕患者新鲜周期胚胎移植妊娠结局的影响

扫码查看
目的 探讨限制能量平衡膳食模式(CRD)联合肠道微生态制剂对超重/肥胖不孕患者行新鲜周期胚胎移植妊娠结局的影响.方法 选取2019年1月至2021年12月于该院行体外受精/卵细胞质内单精子显微注射-胚胎移植助孕新鲜胚胎移植的197例患者为研究对象,根据BMI大小和是否接受CRD干预分为超重干预组(n=46)、超重对照组(n=85)、肥胖干预组(n=29)、肥胖对照组(n=37),比较各组妊娠结局相关指标及干预前后体重和体成分变化.结果 与干预前相比,超重干预组体重[(63.59±4.90)kg vs.(67.47±5.10)kg]、BMI[(25.74±1.26)kg/m2 vs.(26.58±0.75)kg/m2]、体脂百分比[(36.51±3.76)%vs.(39.21±4.26)%]、腰臀比(0.88±0.04 vs.0.91±0.04)、内脏脂肪等级(10.80±2.45 vs.12.63±2.60)、基础代谢率[(1 235.98±74.32)kcal vs.(1 254.63±77.23)kcal]明显降低(P<0.05);肥胖干预组体重[(71.79±9.78)kg vs.(77.18±9.62)kg]、BMI[(29.04±2.96)kg/m2 vs.(31.21±2.64)kg/m2]、体脂百分比[(40.47±4.77)%vs.(43.97±3.81)%]、腰臀比(0.92±0.05 vs.0.96±0.06)、内脏脂肪等级(14.00±3.74 vs.16.59±3.15)明显降低(P<0.05).与超重对照组比较,超重干预组移植胚胎数[(1.85±0.36)个vs.(1.96±0.19)个]更少(P<0.05),且活胎数[(0.61±0.37)个 vs.(0.56±0.36)个]更多,活产率(43.48%vs.40.00%)更高,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).与肥胖对照组比较,肥胖干预组临床妊娠率(72.41%vs.51.35%)、活产率(58.62%vs.35.14%)更高,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 CRD联合肠道微生态制剂可降低超重/肥胖不孕患者的体重和体脂,可能有助于提高肥胖不孕患者辅助生殖成功率.
Effect of CRD combined with intestinal micro-ecological preparation on pregnancy outcomes in overweight/obese infertile patients with fresh embryo transfer cycles
Objective To investigate the effects of calorie-restricted diet(CRD)combined with intesti-nal micro-ecological preparation on the clinical outcomes of overweight/obese infertile patients undergoing fresh embryo transfer cycle.Methods A total of 197 cases of fresh embryo transfer assisted by in vitro fertili-zation(IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection(ICSI)-embryo transfer(ET)in the hospital from January,2019 to December,2021 were selected as the research objects,and were divided into the overweight interven-tion group(n=46),the overweight control group(n=85)and the obesity intervention group(n=85)accord-ing to the body mass index(BMI)and whether they accepted CRD intervention or not.Results Compared to before the intervention,the overweight intervention group had significantly lower body mass[(63.59±4.90)kg vs.(67.47±5.10)kg],BMI[(25.74±1.26)kg/m2 vs.(26.58±0.75)kg/m2],body fat percentage[(36.51±3.76)%vs.(39.21±4.26)%],waist to hip ratio(0.88±0.04 vs.0.91±0.04),visceral fat grade(10.80±2.45 vs.12.63±2.60),and basal metabolic rate[(1 235.98±74.32)kcal vs.(1 254.63±77.23)kcal],P<0.05;The body mass[(71.79±9.78)kg vs.(77.18±9.62)kg],BMI[(29.04±2.96)kg/m2 vs.(31.21±2.64)kg/m2],body fat percentage[(40.47±4.77)%vs.(43.97±3.81)%],waist to hip ratio(0.92±0.05 vs.0.96±0.06),and visceral fat grade(14.00±3.74 vs.16.59±3.15)of the obesity interven-tion group were significantly reduced(P<0.05).Compared with the overweight control group,the number of transplanted embryos(1.85±0.36 vs.1.96±0.19)in the overweight intervention group was less(P<0.05),while the number of live births(0.61±0.37 vs.0.56±0.36)was more,the live birth rate(43.48%vs.40.00%)was higher,but there was no statistically significant difference(P>0.05).The clinical preg-nancy rate and live birth rate in the obesity intervention group were higher than those in the control group(72.41%vs.51.35%and 58.62%vs.35.14%),with no statistical significance,but with a strong statistical significance(P>0.05).Conclusion CRD combined with intestinal micro-ecological preparation can signifi-cantly reduce the body mass and body fat of overweight/obese infertile patients,may help improve the success rate of assisted reproduction in obese infertile patients.

calorie-restrict dietintestinal microbiomeoverweightobesityembryo transferclinical outcome

钟荧、罗红、韩树标、李天萍、周锋、宋琪、孙海岚

展开 >

重庆医科大学附属妇女儿童医院/重庆市妇幼保健院临床营养科,重庆 401147

重庆医科大学附属妇女儿童医院/重庆市妇幼保健院生殖医学中心,重庆 401147

重庆医科大学附属妇女儿童医院/重庆市妇幼保健院医务科,重庆 401147

限制能量平衡膳食模式 肠道微生态 超重 肥胖 胚胎移植 妊娠结局

重庆市科卫联合医学科研项目

2021MSXM192

2024

重庆医学
重庆市卫生信息中心,重庆市医学会

重庆医学

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.797
ISSN:1671-8348
年,卷(期):2024.53(10)
  • 5