首页|成都地区急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死溶栓治疗的实施现状调查及影响因素分析

成都地区急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死溶栓治疗的实施现状调查及影响因素分析

扫码查看
目的 了解急诊医生对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)指南推荐溶栓治疗的知晓及实施情况,分析相关影响因素。方法 2023年4-7月依托成都市急诊急救质量控制中心向其专家组成员所在医院及医联体医院发放调查问卷,调查成都地区急诊医生对STEMI溶栓治疗的知晓、实施现状及参加培训情况,并分析影响溶栓决策的原因。结果 共137家医院参与调查。是否胸痛救治体系及类型、胸痛中心、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)资质医院、科室开展培训及医院等级与STEMI患者发病12 h内转运前是否溶栓有关(P<0。05),是否PCI资质医院、胸痛中心、胸痛救治体系及类型、开展培训,以及医院等级、地理位置、转运时长、溶栓指针知晓情况与首次医疗接触(FMC)到PCI(FMC-PCI)时长≥120 min是否建议溶栓无关(P>0。05)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,科室是否开展培训是STEMI患者发病12 h内转运前是否溶栓的影响因素(P<0。05),医院等级是非胸痛救治体系STEMI患者发病12 h内转运前是否溶栓的影响因素(P<0。05)。STEMI患者发病12 h内未行溶栓而直接转诊的主要原因是知道需要溶栓但不知道该怎么做(50。00%)。非主城区溶栓指针知晓率高于主城区(P<0。05),PCI资质医院开展科室培训率高于非PCI资质医院(P<0。05),不同医院等级及地理位置接受上级医院培训率也有差异(P<0。05)。结论 开展溶栓培训、加强STEMI救治流程的学习直接影响急诊医生对STEMI患者再灌注策略的选择,持续推进胸痛中心或胸痛救治单元的建设有助于进一步提高STEMI早期再灌注率。
Investigation on implementation status of thrombolytic therapy in STEMI type myocardial infarction in Chengdu area and influencing factors analysis
Objective To understand the awareness of the emergency physicians for thrombolytic thera-py recommended by ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI)guidelines and implementation sit-uation,and to analyze the related influencing factors.Methods Relying on Chengdu Emergency Quality Con-trol Center,the questionnaires were distributed to the hospitals of expert group members and the hospitals of the medical union from April to July 2023 to investigate the awareness,implementation status and training status of the emergency doctors in Chengdu area on the STEMI thrombolytic therapy.The causes affecting thrombolysis decision-making were analyzed.Results A total of 137 hospitals participated in the survey.Whether the treatment system and type of chest pain,chest pain center,percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI)qualified hospitals or departments carrying out the training and hospital grade were correlated to whether STEMI patients were thrombolyzed within 12 h before transport(P<0.05).Whether the PCI quali-fied hospital,chest pain center,chest pain treatment system and type,carrying training,hospital grade,geo-graphical location,transport duration,and thrombolytic indication understanding situation were not related to whether thrombolytic therapy was recommended for the duration from the first medical contact(FMC)to PCI(FMC-PCI)≥120 min(P>0.05).The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that whether the de-partment carrying out the training was an influential factor for whether thrombolytic therapy was carried out within 12 h before transport in STEMI onset(P<0.05).The hospital grade was a influencing factor for whether thrombolysis in non-chest pain treatment system was carried before transport within 12 h of the onset of STEMI.The main reason for STEMI patients being directly transfered treatment without thrombolysis within 12 h of onset was because they knew that thrombolysis was needed but did not know how to do it(50.00%).The awareness rate of thrombolytic indication in non-main urban area was higher than that in main urban area(P<0.05).The carrying out department training rate of PCI qualified hospitals was higher than that of non-PCI qualified hospitals(P<0.05).The receiving superior hospital training rate also had difference among different hospital grades and geographical locations.Conclusion Conducting the thrombolysis training and enhancing the learning of treatment processes directly affect the emergency physicians'choice of reperfu-sion strategies for the patients with STEMI.Continuous promotion of the construction of chest pain center or chest pain treatment unit could further increase the early reperfusion rate of STEMI.

myocardial infarctionthrombolysisreperfusionemergency physicians

黄永平、熊诗强、项涛、张晓东

展开 >

成都市第三人民医院/西南交通大学附属医院急诊科,成都 610031

成都市第三人民医院/西南交通大学附属医院心血管内科,成都 610031

心肌梗死 溶栓 再灌注 急诊医生

成都市医学科研课题

2021217

2024

重庆医学
重庆市卫生信息中心,重庆市医学会

重庆医学

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.797
ISSN:1671-8348
年,卷(期):2024.53(12)
  • 13