首页|不同年龄人群心房颤动对于新发急性心肌梗死发病风险研究

不同年龄人群心房颤动对于新发急性心肌梗死发病风险研究

扫码查看
目的 探讨不同年龄人群罹患心房颤动是否增加新发急性心肌梗死(AMI)发病风险。方法 采用前瞻性队列研究,选取2006年6月至2007年10月参加开滦集团职工健康查体人群96 624例纳入研究。研究对象每年1次随访,最后随访日期为2020年12月31日,中位数随访14。01年,终点事件为新发AMI。以年龄≥60岁和年龄<60岁将研究对象分为2个年龄组,并按照是否罹患心房颤动分为心房颤动组和非心房颤动组。对研究对象进行流行病学调查及人体测量,统计分析不同年龄段人群心房颤动与新发AMI发病是否相关。结果 总人群中心房颤动组411例,非心房颤动组96 213例;年龄<60岁中,心房颤动组121例,非心房颤动组75 151例;年龄≥60岁中,心房颤动组290例,非心房颤动组21 062例。总人群中,心房颤动组AMI累积发病率高于非心房颤动组(5。68%vs。1。92%),差异有统计学意义(P<0。05);<60岁人群中,心房颤动组AMI累积发病率高于非心房颤动组(7。40%vs。1。43%),差异有统计学意义(P<0。05);≥60岁人群中,心房颤动组和非心房颤动组AMI累积发病率比较(4。54%vs。3。87%),差异无统计学意义(P=0。547)。全人群中心房颤动是新发AMI的危险因素(HR=1。877,95%CI:1。177~2。991,P=0。008),年龄与心房颤动存在交互作用(P=0。016)。年龄分层分析中,<60岁人群中心房颤动是新发AMI的危险因素(HR=3。029,95%CI:1。508~6。082,P=0。002)。结论 心房颤动是新发AMI的独立危险因素,特别是对于中青年人群(<60岁)。
Risk of atrial fibrillation in different age groups on onset of new-onset acute myocardial infarction
Objective To investigate whether suffering from atrial fibrillation in different ages of people increasing the onset risk of new-onset acute myocardial infarction(AMI).Methods A prospective cohort study was conducted to select 96 624 Kailuan Group employees undergoing the health examination from June 2006 to October 2007 for including the study.The participants were followed up once a year,and the last fol-low-up date was December 31,2020,with a median follow-up of 14.01 years,and the endpoint event was new-onset AMI.The participants were divided into two age groups according to the age ≥60 years and the age<60 years old,and divided into the atrial fibrillation group and non-atrial fibrillation group according to whether they had atrial fibrillation.The epidemiological investigation and anthropometric measurements were carried out on the participates.Whether atrial fibrillation was correlated to the onset of new-onset AMI in different age groups conducted the statistical analysis.Results Among the total participants,there were 411 cases in the atrial fibrillation group and 96 213 cases in the non-atrial fibrillation group.Among the participants<60 years old,there were 121 cases in the atrial fibrillation group and 75 151 cases in the non-atrial fibrillation group.Among the participants ≥60 years old,there were 290 cases in the atrial fibrillation group and 21 062 cases in the non-atrial fibrillation group.In the total participants,the cumulative incidence rate of AMI in the atrial fibrillation group was higher than that in the non-atrial fibrillation group(5.68%vs.1.92%),and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).In the participants<60 years old,the cumulative incidence rate of AMI in the atrial fibrillation group was higher than that in the non-atrial fibrillation group(7.40%vs.1.43%),and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).In the participants 60 year old,the cu-mulative incidence rate of AMI had no statistical difference between the atrial fibrillation group and non-atrial fibrillation group(4.54%vs.3.87%,P=0.547).In the whole participants,atrial fibrillation was a risk factor for new-onset AMI(HR=1.877,95%CI:1.177-2.991,P=0.008),and there was an interaction between age and atrial fibrillation(P=0.016).In the age stratification analysis,atrial fibrillation was a risk factor for new-onset AMI in<60-year-old population(HR=3.029,95%CI:1.508-6.082,P=0.002).Conclusion Atrial fibrillation is an independent risk factor for new-onset AMI,especially to young and middle-aged people(<60 years old).

atrial fibrillationnew-onset acute myocardial infarctionrisk factorsepidemiologyrisk of onset

张佳伟、侯旗旗、齐祺、于洁、杨慧、韩全乐

展开 >

开滦唐家庄医院康复医学科,河北唐山 063199

唐山市工人医院心内科,河北唐山 063000

唐山市工人医院心理科,河北唐山 063000

心房颤动 新发急性心肌梗死 危险因素 流行病学 发病风险

2024

重庆医学
重庆市卫生信息中心,重庆市医学会

重庆医学

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.797
ISSN:1671-8348
年,卷(期):2024.53(24)