首页|基于地基激光扫描和手持激光扫描的规划条件核实测量精度对比

基于地基激光扫描和手持激光扫描的规划条件核实测量精度对比

扫码查看
针对城市场景空间分布复杂,传统测绘技术手段不能满足规划条件核实测量需求,而三维激光扫描技术在规划条件核实测量中技术方案尚不成熟的问题,本文以广州市南沙区新建厂区为实验区域,通过研究随机采样一致性(Random Sample Consensus,简称RANSAC)算法和最小二乘算法自动提取建筑物外轮廓的可行性,将不同平台激光扫描方法得到成果与传统方法进行对比分析.结果表明,手持式三维激光扫描方法的扫描效率最高,成本最低,但采集的点云质量和精度低于地基三维激光点云.经实地验证,相关结果表明采用地基激光雷达扫描能满足测量规范要求的精度,而手持式三维激光扫描测量的部分建筑边长误差较大,生产过程中需进行精度校核和控制.
Comparison of Measurement Accuracy for Planning Condition Verification Measurement Based on Ground-based Laser Scanning and Hand-held Laser Scanning
In view of the complex spatial distribution of urban scene,traditional surveying and mapping technology can not meet the needs of planning verification and measurement,and three-dimensional laser scanning technology is not mature in planning verification and measure-ment,this paper takes the newly built factory in Nansha District of Guangzhou city as the experimental area,and studies the feasibility of RANSAC algorithm and least squares algorithm to automatically extract the outer contour of buildings.The results obtained by different plat-form laser scanning methods are compared with the traditional methods.The results show that the handheld 3D laser scanning method has the highest scanning efficiency and the lowest cost,but the quality and accuracy of the collected point cloud are lower than that of the ground-based 3D laser point cloud.Field verification has shown that ground-based LiDAR scanning meets the precision requirements of measurement standards,while some building edge lengths measured with hand-held 3D laser scanning have larger errors.Accuracy verification and control are needed during the production process.

three-dimensional laser scanningRANSAC algorithmplanning condition verification measurementprecision

胡昌华、戴志胜

展开 >

广州市城市规划勘测设计研究院,广东 广州 510030

三维激光扫描 RANSAC算法 规划条件核实测量 精度

2024

城市勘测
中国城市规划协会 武汉市测绘研究院

城市勘测

影响因子:0.488
ISSN:1672-8262
年,卷(期):2024.(6)