首页|斜拉桥V形钢塔-混凝土基座结合构造方式比选

斜拉桥V形钢塔-混凝土基座结合构造方式比选

扫码查看
某人行景观桥为空间异型钢塔斜拉桥,主塔中2根箱型钢柱在四棱台混凝土基座上方交汇呈非对称V形,钢柱轴线与其底端钢-混连接面不垂直,基座尺寸严格受制于河道防洪要求,使塔根-基座结合部构造方式设计具有挑战性.按照造价相当的标准初步拟定3种结合方案,采用ABAQUS软件分别建立相应的有限元模型,选取塔底支座反力中平面内外弯矩绝对值相加最大的组合进行模拟计算及其结果比较和对标检验.研究结果表明:承压-传剪组合式结合部可以大幅度减小桥塔根部、基座及其中锚箱的应力,使其合理满足相关规范要求.就塔根最大位移和应力幅而言,均为传剪式最大、组合式最小.组合式方案中承压板厚度较承压式减小1/3,应力虽有上升却未超限,材料利用率提高.承压式、特别是传剪式构造方案中,混凝土基座最大主拉应力远超规范限值,无法满足抗裂要求.传剪式方案中锚箱钢板Mises应力也超限22%,且与其竖向压应力和混凝土主拉应力的最大值处于同一位置.传剪式方案不适用的原因是,锚箱中侧面竖板间距太小,矩形板与柱壁连接屈从于不利构造特点,形成大转折.无论应力大小还是变形控制,组合式方案都值得优先选择.研究成果直接服务于本工程,对类似工程也有一定的参考价值.
Comparison of joint schemes between V-shaped steel tower and concrete base for cable-stayed bridge
A pedestrian bridge over river was designed as a cable-stayed bridge with special-shaped steel tower,in which two steel columns with box section meet just above concrete base to become asymmetric V junction.The axis of steel column was not perpendicular to the junction-concrete interface,and base size was strictly limited by the requirements of flood passage.These bring great challenge to the structural design of steel-concrete joint.On the basis of equivalent cost,three different kinds of joint schemes were preliminarily drawn up,that were the pressure type,the shear type and the combined type.The corresponding finite element model was established by using ABAQUS software.The combination with the maximum absolute value of in-plane and out-plane bending moments in the reaction force at the support of the tower bottom is selected for finite element analyses.The results were compared both among three schemes and to the provisions in the relevant codes.It shows that the combined pressure-shear joint can greatly reduce the stresses at the root of the steel column,the base and the anchor box,and reasonably meet the code requirements.In terms of the maximum displacement and stress variation amplitude near the column bottom,the largest values occurred in the shear type and the smallest in the combined type.In the combined scheme,the thickness of bearing plate is reduced by 1/3 compared with that of pressure type.The maximum Mises stress is increased but do not exceed the limit.So the material utilization rate is improved.The maximum principal tensile stress of the concrete base is far beyond the limit of the code in the pressure scheme,especially in the shear scheme,which cannot meet the requirements of cracking resistance.The maximum Mises stress at steel plate of the anchor box in the shear scheme also exceeds the standard limit by 22%,and it is at the same position as the maximum values of its vertical compressive stress and the principal tensile stress of concrete.The shear scheme is not applicable because the vertical plates on the side of the anchor box is not far enough to each other and unfavorable structural features leads to great angle between the rectangular plates and the column wall.The combined scheme is worthy of priority regardless of stress or deformation control.The research results can serve the project,and also have reference value for similar projects.

steel tower cable-stayed bridgesteel-concrete jointstructural connectionjoint schemefinite element analysis

肖逸鹏、周朝阳、何畅、孙秀贵、胡迎新、王兴国

展开 >

中南大学 土木工程学院,湖南 长沙 410075

湖南省交通规划勘察设计院有限公司,湖南 长沙 410008

湖南中大设计院有限公司,湖南 长沙 410075

河南理工大学 土木工程学院,河南 焦作 454000

展开 >

钢塔斜拉桥 钢-混结合部 结构连接 构造方式 有限元分析

长沙市政府采购研究项目国家自然科学基金

CSCG-20210706006651878664

2024

铁道科学与工程学报
中南大学 中国铁道学会

铁道科学与工程学报

CSTPCD北大核心EI
影响因子:0.837
ISSN:1672-7029
年,卷(期):2024.21(3)
  • 1
  • 21