首页|运营十年海底隧道排水量与衬砌水压力分析

运营十年海底隧道排水量与衬砌水压力分析

扫码查看
海底隧道下穿海域,采用"V"型坡,机械排水,海底隧道的地下水控制影响排水量大小和衬砌水压力的大小,从而影响建设成本和运营成本.国内外对海底隧道的地下水渗流研究较多,但结合运营期长期实测排水量、水压力等数据进行的研究较少.为了研究海底隧道的排水量、水压力以及随时间的变化,验证原设计参数的合理性,本文结合青岛胶州湾隧道运营期的健康监测结果,采用工程类比、数值模拟方法,对建设期+运营期10年的监测数据进行统计分析,研究海底隧道的允许排水量、衬砌水压力以及其随时间的变化、排水量和大气降水的相关性.隧道设计的允许排水量主隧道≤0.4 m3/(d∙m)、服务隧道≤0.2 m3/(d∙m),衬砌水压折减系数为0.6.通过对运营期的排水量、水压力、结构渗漏等实测结果进行统计分析,得出如下结果:1)隧道的排水量逐年减少;2)隧道运营后的排水量主隧道约为0.2 m3/(d∙m),服务隧道约为0.1 m3/(d∙m);3)作用在二次衬砌上的水压力约为全水头压力的0.05~0.1倍;4)运营5年后排水量的大小和水压力、大气降水的相关性不大.与原设计进行对比分析可得:原设计采用的岩石地层钻爆法海底隧道的渗流计算方法、隧道允许排水量、衬砌水压力取值等标准合理且有一定的安全系数,岩体的透水裂隙有一定的自闭合作用.研究结果可为后续工程建设提供参考.
Analysis of lining water pressure and groundwater discharge of undersea tunnel after 10-years operation
The undersea tunnels with a"V"shaped slope normally require a mechanical discharging system.Undersea tunnel groundwater control affects the magnitude of discharge and water lining pressure,which in turn affects the cost of construction and operation.There are also many international research or studies on the ground-water infiltration of undersea tunnels,however only a few have been conducted in conjunction with the actual measurement of discharging capacity and water pressure during the operation.This study investigated the drainage volume and lining water pressure in subsea tunnels,focusing on their temporal variations and the rationality of original design parameters,based on long-term monitoring data.By using the Qingdao Jiaozhouwan Tunnel as a case study,methods such as engineering analogy,numerical simulation,and statistical analysis of 10 years of construction and operational monitoring data were applied.This research delved into an intricate analysis of relationships critical to subsea tunnel construction,including the correlation between seepage models and permissible discharging volumes,the dynamics between water pressure and actual daily drainage volumes,and the interplay between structural leakage and monitored water pressure.Additionally,the seepage behavior of rock drilling and blasting methods,alongside assessing lining water pressure values and allowable groundwater discharging volumes was examined.The original designed drainage was a maximum ratio of 0.4 m3/(d∙m)for the main tunnel and a maximum ratio of 0.2 m3/(d∙m)for the service tunnel.The lining water pressure reduction factor was 0.6.Statistical analysis of the measured results of drainage,water pressure,and structural leakage during the operation,the following results reveal that drainage volume decreases annually,stabilizing at approximately 0.2 m3/(d∙m)for the main tunnel and 0.1 m3/(d∙m)for the service tunnel during operation,while the water pressure on the secondary lining is 5%~10%of the full head pressure.Minimal correlation was observed between drainage volume,water pressure,and atmospheric precipitation after five years of operation.The findings confirm that the original design standards,including permissible drainage volumes and lining water pressure reduction coefficients,are reasonable with adequate safety margins.Observed self-sealing behaviors of rock mass fractures provide further validation.This comprehensive analysis provides valuable insights and serves as a reference for the planning and execution of future subsea tunnel projects.

undersea tunnelallowable drainagewater pressureseepagecleftinessrockdrilling and blast

周冰洁、周书明

展开 >

南洋理工大学 土木与环境学院,新加坡 639798

北京城建设计发展集团股份有限公司,北京 100037

海底隧道 允许排水量 水压力 渗流 裂隙 岩石 钻爆法

2024

铁道科学与工程学报
中南大学 中国铁道学会

铁道科学与工程学报

CSTPCD北大核心EI
影响因子:0.837
ISSN:1672-7029
年,卷(期):2024.21(12)