首页|科研项目申报中的学术不端行为分析——以国家自然科学基金为例

科研项目申报中的学术不端行为分析——以国家自然科学基金为例

扫码查看
对276起国家自然科学基金委通报的学术不端案例进行梳理,发现科研项目申请中的学术不端问题易发多发且形式多样.科研项目的申请人员、管理人员及评审专家都存在学术不端的风险.科研项目学术不端由宏观层面、中观层面及微观层面交织而成.为此,应深化高校科研多元评价制度改革,健全申报数据库建设的同时完善惩罚机制,学校要充分发挥学术委员会的作用,加强科研管理,同时要加强科研诚信教育,充分发挥媒体曝光作用并严查"第三方机构",营造风清气正的科研环境.
Analysis of Academic Misconduct in Scientific Research Project Application:Taking the National Natural Science Foundation of China as an Example
Cademic misconduct occurs frequently through the process of scientific research project ap-plication. Through sorting out 276 cases of academic misconduct reported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China,it is found that academic misconduct in scientific research project applications is prone to occur frequently and takes various forms. There is a risk of academic misconduct among the applicants,managers,and reviewers of scientific research projects. Academic misconduct in scientific research projects is intertwined at the macro,meso,and micro levels. To this end,it is necessary to deepen the reform of the diversified evaluation system for scientific research in universities,improve the construction of application databases,and improve the punishment mechanism. Universities should fully leverage academic committees and strengthen scientific research management. At the same time,they should strengthen scientific research integrity education should be strengthened,the media exposure should be fully leveraged,and the"third-party"institutions should be strictly investigated,to creating a clean and upright scientific research environ-ment.

scientific research project applicationacademic misconductNational Natural Science Foundation of Chinatechnology evaluation

吴璐晗

展开 >

福建江夏学院科研处,福建 福州 350108

科研项目申报 学术不端 国家自然科学基金 科技评价

福建江夏学院校级科研管理项目

JXS2023012

2024

常州工学院学报
常州工学院

常州工学院学报

影响因子:0.274
ISSN:1671-0436
年,卷(期):2024.37(4)