档案管理2024,Issue(2) :80-83.

代表作视角下的期刊评价指标研究

周春雷 杨前 汪巧红 丁倩文 杨昭
档案管理2024,Issue(2) :80-83.

代表作视角下的期刊评价指标研究

周春雷 1杨前 2汪巧红 3丁倩文 2杨昭2
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 郑州大学信息管理学院、郑州市数据科学研究中心
  • 2. 郑州大学信息管理学院
  • 3. 郑州大学教育学院
  • 折叠

摘要

基于代表作评价理念提出能反映期刊长期学术声望的C10指数,验证其有效性并探讨其应用价值.将期刊近十年内发表且产生较大学术影响的论文(被引次数不低于10)视为该刊的代表性论文,期刊拥有此类论文的数量即为其C10值.通过CSSCI和CNKI数据库采集相关数据并计算CSSCI来源期刊(2021-2022)的C10及其衍生指标,识别出具有较高学术声望的期刊,将其与获得国家社科基金资助及高校人文社科奖的期刊进行比较以验证C10指数的有效性,进而探讨该指数的应用价值.实证研究表明,利用本文所提方法识别出的期刊在获得国家社科基金资助及高校人文社科奖方面表现良好.基于代表作评价理念的C10指数能有效识别学术声望比较高的期刊及其代表性论文,可在期刊评价和期刊发展方面发挥一定的作用.

Abstract

Based on the concept of representative works evaluation,this paper introduces the C10 index,a novel metric which can reflect the long-term academic reputation of journals,and verifies its validity and discusses its application value.The C10 index aims to capture the long-term academic reputation of journals by identifying representative papers with a high academic impact(cited no less than 10 times)published in the last ten years.The number of such papers associated with a journal determines its C10 value.To validate the C10 Index,data from CSSCI and CNKI databases were collected to calculate the index for CSSCI source journals(2021-2022).Journals with high academic prestige were identified using this index and compared with those recognized by the National Social Science Foundation of China and awarded the Science Research Famous Achievement Award in Higher Institutions(Humanities and Social Science).The study confirmed the validity of the C10 index and explored its application value in journal evaluation and development.The empirical findings demonstrate that journals selected based on the C10 index criteria have excelled in receiving grants from the National Social Science Foundation of China and prestigious awards for Science Research in Higher Institutions(Humanities and Social Science).The C10 index,rooted in the concept of representative work evaluation,effectively distinguishes journals with high academic prestige and their representative papers.This metric can significantly contribute to journal evaluation processes and foster the advancement of academic publications.

关键词

C10指数/代表作/评价理念/期刊评价/代表性论文/引文/精品率/诊断

Key words

C10 index/Representative work/Evaluation concept/Journal evaluation/Representative papers/Citation/Premium rate/Diagnosis

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
档案管理
河南省档案局

档案管理

CHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.509
ISSN:1005-9458
段落导航相关论文