《档案法》效力性质研究的理论反思——"软法"还是"硬法"的规范分析
Theoretical Reflections on the Study of the Nature of the Effects of the Archives Law in the Light of the"Soft Law Clauses"
何晓琴1
作者信息
- 1. 浙江省哲学社会科学实验室-之江实验室智能社会治理实验室,杭州 311100
- 折叠
摘要
《档案法》的效力"软硬"判断从软法性条款研究进路予以展开是一个适当的讨论视角.以《档案法》的档案定义条款、档案安全隐患条款与立法目的条款为例展开分析,认为当前的研究方法与结论均不甚准确.导致"不甚准确"的缘由在于以下五个方面:一是使用"连接词"的分析方式不够恰当也不准确;二是所运用的语义分析方法忽略了语言经济性原则;三是分析过程中未能区分《档案法》不同规制对象的公私属性;四是未重视《档案法》本身的篇章结构信息;五则在于当前的"软法性条款"分析范式存在着对软法理论原旨的误用.今后通过软法性条款视角分析《档案法》的效力"软硬"时可以从上述五点着手,以获得一个更为稳妥合适的结论.
Abstract
The"hard and soft"judgement of the effectiveness of the Archives Law is an appropriate perspective for discussion.Taking the clauses of the Archives Law on the definition of archives,the clauses on the security risks of archives,and the clauses on the purpose of legislation as examples,we think the current research methodology and conclusions are inaccurate.The reasons for the"inaccuracy"lie in the following five aspects:first,the use of the"coordinated phrases"analysis is not appropriate or accurate;second,the semantic analysis method used ignores the principle of linguistic economy;third,the analysis fails to distinguish between the public and private attributes of the different regulatory objects of the Archives Law;fourth,the structural information in the chapter structure of the Archives Law is not taken into account;and,fifth,the current paradigm of analyzing the"Soft Law Clauses"is a misapplication of the original purpose of the theory of soft law.In the future,when analyzing the"softness"and"hardness"of the effectiveness of the Archives Law through the perspective of Soft Law Clauses,we can start from the above five points in order to obtain a more stable and appropriate conclusion.
关键词
《档案法》/软法性条款/定义条款/立法目的条款/软法Key words
Archives law/Soft legal provisions/Definition of clause/Legislative purpose clause/Soft Law引用本文复制引用
出版年
2025
NETL
NSTL
万方数据