The Legal Theory and Practical Significance of the Renaming from Measures for the Implementation of Archives Law to Regulations for the Implementation of Archives Law
The renaming of the Measures for the Implementation of Archives Law to the Regulations for the Implementation of Archives Law is based on profound legal considerations:its fundamental logic lies in the history of amendments in Article 26 of the original Archives Law,which was deleted,enabling the State Council's legislative power to be fully exercised.Specifically,firstly,there are no special restrictions on the formulation of supporting regulations for the Archives Law;secondly,the renaming requirements from the exercise of legislative power by the State Council;thirdly,the necessity for the development of innovative content in the Regulations for the Implementation of Archives Law.The practical implications brought about by the renaming include three aspects:better highlighting the legal status of the Regulations for the Implementation of Archives Law,reserving regulatory space for the development of the archival industry,and triggering the application of transitional regulations.The promulgation of the Regulations for the Implementation of Archives Law is an important milestone event in the development history of the archival industry,which has streamlined the institutional mechanism for the development of the archival industry,made the legal system of archives more integrated,and will promote the continuous development of the rule of law in archival undertakings.
Archives LawRegulations for the Implementation of Archives LawMeasures for the Implementation of Archives LawLegislative Power of the State CouncilNaming of Administrative Regulations